DOJ grants immunity to ex-Clinton staffer

[SlyPokerDog]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/02/politics/hillary-clinton-email-server-justice-department/index.html

:MARIS61:

 

[MarAzul]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/02/politics/hillary-clinton-email-server-justice-department/index.html

:MARIS61:

This is very funny. He needs immunity for what he knows as the installer of the system. But the owner and user has done no wrong.

Mean while they never tire of dumpping crap on David Petraeus for a lessor offence.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/18/exclusive-pentagon-may-demote-david-petraeus.html

Perhaps Trump should offer her a pardon in exchange for her support. Ha!

Come to think of it, he could offer Petraeus a pardon for a plan on dealing with ISS. No one else
seems to come up with one.

 

[barfo]

Mean while they never tire of dumpping crap on David Petraeus for a lessor offence.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/18/exclusive-pentagon-may-demote-david-petraeus.html

How is that? Petraeus shared classified information with someone outside government. Clinton kept classified information in her bathroom.

What makes the latter worse than the former?

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

How is that? Petraeus shared classified information with someone outside government. Clinton kept classified information in her bathroom.

What makes the latter worse than the former?

barfo

Well you have no idea whom she shared it with. But then we do know she was suppose to share it with the State Department before she left. She didn't and claimed she never would.
Hardly seems like you can fuck it up any better.

 

[barfo]

Well you have no idea whom she shared it with.

Nor do I know how often you beat your wife.

But then we do know she was suppose to share it with the State Department before she left. She didn't and claimed she never would.
Hardly seems like you can fuck it up any better.

You didn't answer the question. How is that worse than what Petraeus did?

On the 'setting classified information free' scale, it seems to me that Petraeus is closer to Snowden then Hillary is.

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

Nor do I know how often you beat your wife.



You didn't answer the question. How is that worse than what Petraeus did?

On the 'setting classified information free' scale, it seems to me that Petraeus is closer to Snowden then Hillary is.

barfo

Sure I did.

 

[e_blazer]

 

[barfo]

Whole lotta speculation there. Let's get the conspiracy theories ready for when she doesn't get charged with anything.

barfo

 

[Denny Crane]

Whole lotta speculation there. Let's get the conspiracy theories ready for when she doesn't get charged with anything.

barfo

 

[3RA1N1AC]

I'm not sure I know anyone who wants to vote for her. I'm sure quite a few will though.

 

[speeds]

I'm not sure I know anyone who wants to vote for her. I'm sure quite a few will though.

Red state Democrats are voting for Hillary, Blue for Bernie.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

So she has support in States that won't matter in the general.

Why is the DNC pushing her again?

 

[dviss1]

Red state Democrats are voting for Hillary, Blue for Bernie.

This means her delegate lead is the highest it will ever be. Imagine if Sanders wins New York and California.

 

[MARIS61]

Red state Democrats are voting for Hillary, Blue for Bernie.

I'm a blue state Dem voting for Bernie in the primary, but the fix is already in for Hillary.

In the end I'll likely be a blue Dem voting for Trump.