<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (xcalibur @ Jan 3 2008, 03:01 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcTmac24 @ Jan 3 2008, 01:58 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (xcalibur @ Jan 3 2008, 12:56 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>wow. RJ def is not a one-dimensional player. this is what happens when people rely on stats instead of watching games. let's not forget that we have more rebounders this year, with josh and sean mainly.
RJ won't be voted in by the fans because its a popularity vote, but coaches around the east know the improvement in RJ's game and i really believe he will make it. then again if vince and kidd made it (which looks like it), then i think that could hurt RJ. have 3 guys from one team who's currently around .500?
one-dimensional players are like marbury, nash, korver, ben wallace. RJ does not fit in with this group</div>
WTF, NASH?
Nash can score and make plays Not one-dimensional at all. Jefferson is because he can only score. Unless you feel like a pure jump shooter is one-dimensional then no Jefferson isn't. But Jefferson has only been one-dimensional this season because all he's been able to is score.
</div>
wait, so your saying NASH is NOT a one dimensional player? the dude is all O and no D. its not a secret or anything. nash talks about them needing to improve their defense, but thats like jason collins calling his teammates out saying we need more O when he cant score.
its that nash has found the perfect system for him with the perfect cast where he can max out his main ability and that is running an offense. RJ on the other hand scores and defends the teams best wing for the majority of the game. sorry, if you watch games you can see that RJ is not just a scorer. sorry
</div>
Do you know how many one-dimensional players there would be if being only good at Offense means one-dimensional?
Here are the players that would be one-dimensional
Lebron, Melo, Bosh, Shaq, Ray Allen, Nash, Dirk, Amare, and it goes on.