Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bayless is a carbon copy of Jarrett Jack, only more athletic.
True. But is there really that much risk? I mean, 50 wins would still make most fans happy. Especially if Rubio were throwing a couple of crazy-good passes every game to remind us why we did it. It's half a step back to take two steps forward.

If KP feels that Flynn is like Chris Paul, I could totally see him trading up to acquire Flynn. KP wanted Paul, but he lost out to Nash on that one.
We're trading Outlaw, Fernandez and Bayless to Memphis for Rubio and filler (Marco Jaric--he's got two years and $13 mil owed). Nate McMillan will go nuts and everybody will be scratching their heads. But it makes a ton of sense as a consolidation trade for us, and it gives Memphis a ton of options down the road.
I just made this trade up, but it's the kind of WTF thing Pritchard would do. He goes hard after the guys he wants, and I think he sees Rubio as the answer at PG for a decade (the way he saw Roy, Aldridge and Oden as the answers at three other spots). Thunder likely take Rubio at #3, so he'll do what it takes to get the man he wants at #2. It's a massive consolidation trade that nets us the best prospect, giving up a lot of quantity for quality.
We then make a run at Ron Artest. With luck and some good salesmanship on Artest we start the season with:
PG: Blake/Rubio
SG: Roy/Webster
SF: Artest/Batum
PF: Aldridge/Artest
C: Oden/Przybilla
That is a fucking kick ass team. We'd probably want to find a better backup than Webster for Roy. I expect Blake to lose the starting job by midseason, so maybe he plays a Steve Kerr role as a backup combo guard.
It'd suck to lose Fernandez and Bayless. Between them, they may combine for more all-star appearances over their careers than Rubio. But Rubio is the better fit, and the better talent. If you have the choice between a young Jason Kidd talent (Rubio), or a young duo of Stephon Marbury talent (Bayless) and Rip Hamilton talent (Fernandez), I think you have to take Kidd. Especially if you already have Brandon Roy.
(The one thing that might throw a monkeywrench into this idea is that we worked so hard to convince Fernandez to come here. Rubio will kind of be in the same boat, where he could opt to stay in Spain. Hopefully the way we handle Fernandez wouldn't impact his decision to come.)
Of course, if Webster never really recovers, we can't get Artest and Rubio takes a few years to get his footing, we're going to be kind of desperate. Maybe only get 50 wins. But if it comes together.....
Huh?Sergio to NY for TPE
To get Rubio, we would probably have to give up LMA. That is more like 2 steps back and pray we eventually take 2 forward.
Rubio is the one guy in this draft that I want, so I wasn't referring to him per se.
The "risk" factor... I was considering that you were trading away Rudy and acquiring Artest.
KP is going to do nothing.
So, can you give me some examples of when KP or Nate has said they really liked a player right before the draft and then passed on that player?
Ramon Sessions.
do you have a link for this?
The Blazers, I'm told, are very high on Sessions, the 6-foot-3, 190 pounder who left Nevada after his junior season. He is regarded as a pure point guard, meaning he looks to run the offense and set up teammates.
I've heard the same story plenty of times, but never with a source. I'm starting to wonder if it's just some myth based on KP's mystique as a killer talent evaluator, with Nate being the easy scapegoat. Maybe it's true though. Thanks for looking.
KP will trade #24, and most of our 2nd round picks for a 2010 1st round pick to open up cap space this summer. He might also pick some Euros to stash. That should be the extent of the draft day activity.
The real fun begins July 1.
Or was that a joke?
My gut feeling is that, just like last year w/Bayless, KP will trade up in the draft and get a guy that hasn't been talked about as much as others.

