FEZ, i just don't agree with you. I have problems issues with many players that I think could limit their ability at the next level. I am not sure exactly where every player fits 1 through 6, but Lillard could certainly be there.
MKG has no range and limited handles. Great physical features, and a kickass mindframe, so I think I would take him above Lillard, but if the coaching staff thought his shot was unfixable, he would slide behind.
Beal - a shooter who didn't shoot that well last year and is a little undersized. I don't think he is much of a better prospect than lillard if at all.
But both of those guys I would likely take above Lillard
Barns - I don't think he will be as good as Lillard in the NBA. It's one thing to not be a good passer or creater but it's another thing to know that's your weakness and still not improve. He can score and has excellent measurements, but his scoring is not very efficient and for all his athletic ability, he does not have a quick first step. He will succeed to a degree at the next level, but I doubt he ever becomes an all star. down the road, I see him as being the third best player on a team.
Drummond - I think I take him above Lillard but without actually being able to be there for the interviews or workouts, I really don't know if Itrust he will ever become half of what he is capable of. Good for us, those making the decision get much more info then we do.
My point is not that one of these guys is great and one sucks, or that Lillard is certainly in the top 6 BPA, just that there are enough questions that need to be answered about many of these players and that without all the access that the team gets, we really cant say if Lillard is in the top 6 or not. And to say
is wrong. It's possible, and by my personal assessment, likely.