chuckd3534
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2013
- Messages
- 8,794
- Likes
- 63
- Points
- 48
The risk is there 31...that's the point as I just laid out. I personally would not take that risk, unless like I said yesterday we are rolling and truly a top SC threat...then maybe you take it. If we are not it is a very low % play to keep him and expect you can move Staal or Girardi, both of whom the Rangers have shown no interest in moving up to this point. AND they would have to get one of them to waive their NTC. AND they would have to find a taker to move one. That is way too risky and too many moving parts for my liking. Again simply my opinion.
So yeah I do think that is the question, because unless the Rangers can deal a dman no shot Yandle is back...and honestly thank god for that. No way I want even more money tied up in the D and goalie. We cannot afford to have another big ticket dman.
So yeah I do think that is the question, because unless the Rangers can deal a dman no shot Yandle is back...and honestly thank god for that. No way I want even more money tied up in the D and goalie. We cannot afford to have another big ticket dman.

