Ducks vs Dawgs Game Thread. WIN THE DECADE!!!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
So does this shut up the people constantly bringing up the whole 4th quarter thing?
 
They keep saying he has 88 yards rushing, but they posted that number and then he had another nice run...
 
Natebishop3 said:
Okay? And? My point is that he isn't a superstar quality back. He's not a LaMichael James. A lot of running backs could put up a 100 yard game in our system. I want a RB that puts up a 200 yard game in our system.
Click to expand...

my point is you're not standing by your word, which was he "sucks". Now you're pretending you're an ostrich

I'm all for guys who "suck" who can rack up 100+ yards and be legit NFL prospects playing for my rooting interest

so sorry you couldn't bitch about my pointing out your nonsense being after the game this time

STOMP
 
STOMP said:
my point is you're not standing by your word, which was he "sucks". Now you're pretending you're an ostrich

I'm all for guys who "suck" who can rack up 100+ yards and be legit NFL prospects playing for my rooting interest

so sorry you couldn't bitch about my pointing out your nonsense being after the game this time

STOMP
Click to expand...

Did I say he sucks today? No.

It was something I said in frustration a few weeks ago, during a game, but you're going to constantly bring it up. Get over it dude.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Did I say he sucks today? No.

It was something I said in frustration a few weeks ago, during a game, but you're going to constantly bring it up. Get over it dude.
Click to expand...

classic. So you're a Depends wearing fair weather fan who should to be respected even when you're proven dead wrong again and again? We should all understand because you were "frustrated" with having yet another solid player on the team who you put on blast yet again earlier this game... I've got this right right?

:headbang: reality :headbang:

STOMP
 
STOMP said:
classic. So you're a Depends wearing fair weather fan who should to be respected even when you're proven dead wrong again and again? We should all understand because you were "frustrated" with having yet another solid player on the team who you put on blast yet again earlier this game... I've got this right right?

:headbang: reality :headbang:

STOMP
Click to expand...

Respect me, don't respect me, I don't care. I watch the games for my enjoyment. You bitch about me after every game thread, and I think it's hilarious. You get so butthurt about it.

I even remember the play. Marshall couldn't convert when we were on the 1 yard line. I was frustrated, I said, "Marshall sucks." Sorry that I was frustrated in the heat of the moment and now you constantly bring it up like another annoying poster who likes to bring up old shit. :lol:
 
Holy crap that was a fun game. Damn I wish I had gone, but fun as hell anyways, watched with a big group of evenly split ducks and dawgs.

Now to watch Stanford, if they lose I'll be shocked.
 
Natebishop3 said:
I even remember the play. Marshall couldn't convert when we were on the 1 yard line. I was frustrated, I said, "Marshall sucks." Sorry that I was frustrated in the heat of the moment and now you constantly bring it up like another annoying poster who likes to bring up old shit. :lol:
Click to expand...

old shit... you weren't bitching about Marshall in this very thread in multiple posts?

the thing that is constant in the game threads is your bitching and defending your right to bitch especially about the RB who leads their attack. They're crushing every weekend winning by the largest spread in the game/ranked #2 and still you're acting like they're actively shitting the bed allowing their big/fast/productive RB to play. Admit when you've been dead wrong instead of doubling down on stupid during the best times to be a Duck fan ever

STOMP
 
STOMP said:
old shit... you weren't bitching about Marshall in this very thread in multiple posts?

the thing that is constant in the game threads is your bitching and defending your right to bitch especially about the RB who leads their attack. They're crushing every weekend winning by the largest spread in the game/ranked #2 and still you're acting like they're actively shitting the bed allowing their big/fast/productive RB to play. Admit when you've been dead wrong instead of doubling down on stupid during the best times to be a Duck fan ever

STOMP
Click to expand...

I get that you sit there with a huge boner and a grin on your face for the entire game, but that's not how I am. Sorry.

Natebishop3 said:
Pretty much dude. Props to Marshall for not going down though. He kept working it.
Click to expand...

Natebishop3 said:
Might be time to start warming up DAT.
Click to expand...

Natebishop3 said:
I think we could use his burst of speed. Marshall doesn't have his speed. Washington has a very athletic defense, and they're beating us to the line.
Click to expand...

Natebishop3 said:
He should be getting those snaps. He has that LMJ type of talent. Marshall, imo, does not.
Click to expand...

Natebishop3 said:
Marshall just isn't a James, Stewart, Ontario Smith type of back. He's good, but he's not a star quality player.
Click to expand...

Natebishop3 said:
That's really how I look at him too. He's not a bad back at all, but he just isn't that superstar back that we've had over the years. He reminds me of Maurice Morris a little bit. Talented, strong, but not a superstar.
Click to expand...

Those are all the posts about Marshall from the first half when I was supposedly bashing him again..... where was the bashing?
 
Marshall: last year I thought we'd be in trouble with him as our feature back. But our offense has continued to score a lot of points. He's been very solid, but average. I was surprised to learn that he has such good track times, because he seems to lack the football explosiveness of James/Barner. James and Barner would break one or more every game, but I only remember Marshall breaking one.

Awesome game today. I think this offense is much more balanced than it's been in awhile. We have the best receiving corp that we've had in a long time. We just whipped the #16 team in their house without our star player.

And if you're the other team and you see Maldanado make a FG you know you're fucked.
 
I thought the D did a hell of a job too. That's a hard fighting offense for the dawgs. Damn athletic.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Okay? And? My point is that he isn't a superstar quality back. He's not a LaMichael James. A lot of running backs could put up a 100 yard game in our system. I want a RB that puts up a 200 yard game in our system.
Click to expand...

you always push for individual stars above collective greatness

it's been pointed out by many media types following the Ducks that baring injury it's unlikely that any Duck RB is featured like LaMichael was because they're gaining such top notch guys each year. DAT, Huff, Tyner, Addison, and the rest deserve offensive touches too. This is a good problem to have and with Tony James & Freeman being added next year the RB touches will probably be even more spread out.

LMJ averaged 6.6 yards per carry for his career, while Kenyon averaged 6.2. Though it's a small sample size, Marshall is averaging 6.2 yards per run this season. 2 years ago with LaMichael Oregon averaged 322 rushing yards per game while last year they averaged 315. This year Oregon is averaging 326 yards per game on the ground. I truly fail to see what the issue is here

STOMP
 
Last edited:
Saw the game at Nicoli's in Lake Oswego with friends. There were a lot of Duck fans a few Husky fans. Awesome game! Ducks looked fucking great all the way around.
 
BLAZER PROPHET said:
I think we lose. We're playing flat out bad. Dropping passes, poor timing (like that last "screen" play...) and no DAT (and no Colt). Playing bad, loss of playmakers, bad timing...

I just don't see us winning this one.
Click to expand...

I think we lose too.
 
Nice summary of the Duck v Husky game.

cdT9q0O.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top