You claimed the whole sport of women Canadian powerlifting was ruined, set back, and a joke. I pushed back on the notion that the sport has been ruined and asked for evidence.
From my research there is still plenty of competition and found nothing to show me that the sport has been ruined. I will await the evidence, but I can see you did the research and could not come to that conclusion as well.
Three times you have tried to paint me into a box for challenging your opinion. I haven’t added my opinion into this conversation except that I don’t see where the sport has been ruined.
Implying that I don’t like women sports for pushing back is very disappointing.
Once again you are trying to associate an implication in my position that isn't present in my post.
I didn't imply that you don't like women's sports. I made the assumption that you don't have much experience with women's sports. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I'd love to have a good faith conversation as opposed to slinging backhanded attacks.
I was very clear about my opinion on what has happened in Canadian women's power lifting. Which I brought up because examples were specifically asked for.
I further provided more recent evidence of a trans woman winning the world's strongest woman contest. Which seems impossibly unlikely if there is no advantage over those assigned female at birth for the incredibly small number of trans women.
My opinion is that people who were assigned female at birth cannot compete with people who were assigned male at birth in many activities, regardless of what therapies are taken. And that politicians should not decide overall, or at a sport, league, or event level.
I believe the only thing politicians should engage in is protecting the rights of those sports, leagues, and events to make restrictions based on assignment at birth unless a preponderance of evidence shows another way is as effective and/or less invasive.
I have restated my stance multiple times as you have asked for clarification.
Yet you still seem to want to imply something that I didn't say and have specifically said was not my intention.
This is leading me to believe that you aren't having a conversation in good faith. If you would like to discuss the points that I have actually brought up and the clarifications that I've actually made upon your request then I am happy to continue to discuss this with you.
If you just want to keep derailing the conversation with gotchas then I don't see what the point is. If you have a point I would appreciate you making it. I feel I've been exceedingly clear on my point.
If you can't engage in a conversation with somebody you disagree with without trying to demonize them it shows a level of immaturity that we've seen pretty frequently (and in this very thread).
I would suggest that this attitude drives a lot more undecided people away from positions you may be advocating for than it brings in.