Is it or is it not bringing awareness?
There are whole threads about it. There's discussion. It's having the right effect. It creates dialog and debate. This is how the country moves forward, by having a debate on the MERITS of the argument.
If there are people in this country unaware, I highly doubt these actions will make them aware.
Those who choose not to pay attention are in the woods and caves and likely have little influence on the issues at hand.
The ones that have an impact are fully aware and don't care or are actively prejudiced/ racist.
There is no one to make aware that wants to be aware anymore.
The key, and what Nate bishop is getting at is
Movements like this usually don't go far with out a clear cut agenda and end game.
What is the end game desired and what are the steps to get there that people must be made aware of to accomplish such agenda?
I'm sorry but to say equality or fairness doesn't cut it. It's a generalization without specifics. Its pretty obvious we need specifics because we already have an amended constitution that generally specifies equality of all.
So what is the desired end result?
Another amendment?
Signs on walls, the lynching of anyone who is racist/prejudice?
The problem I have with all this is there seems to be no detailed end game with a lined out agenda with goals that can be achieved and crossed off the list.
Until there is a more consistent message of they desired results, this will never be anything more than a mockery of our actual freedom of speech.
