Politics Enough with the Hillary cult: Her admirers ignore reality, dream of worshipping a queen

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
SlyPokerDog said:
Yes, she struggled, not defending her. But where is a link to the exact quote that you posted? When did she say it? Where did she say it? What else did she say? You can keep posting videos of her but that doesn't make your original quote true.
Click to expand...
The first video is pretty close.
 
Denny Crane said:
The first video is pretty close.
Click to expand...

Denny Crane said:
When asked of her accomplishments as Sec. of State, Hillary replied:

“My accomplishments as Secretary of State? Well, I'm glad you asked! My proudest accomplishment in which I take the most pride, mostly because of the opposition it faced early on, you know… the remnants of prior situations and mindsets that were too narrowly focused in a manner whereby they may have overlooked the bigger picture and we didn’t do that and I’m proud of that. Very proud. I would say that’s a major accomplishment.”

A quote only @barfo could explain.
Click to expand...

Why no link in your original post?
 
I can name two accomplishments by John Kerry. I didn't even have to think that hard.

Opened relations with Cuba. Nuke deal with Iran.

Hillary? Toppled Ghadaffi and turned Lybia into a bombed out hulk of a nation, terrorist breeding ground, and where ISIS looks to expand. The cherry on that pie is Benghazi.

Syria went great under her years, eh? Clueless. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...tement-on-syria/2011/04/01/AFWPEYaC_blog.html

Iraq turned into ISIS.

Egypt had terrorists govern and then a military coup.

Our relationship with Israel went into the toilet.

Middle East Peace further from possible.

We bombed our allies in Pakistan. War crime when Kissinger had the job and we bombed Laos and Cambodia for the same reason. Or was it?

How about that reset button thing with Russia? How has that worked out?



art.clintonlavrov1.gi.jpg


Her accomplishments are easy to name.

Unless you're Diane Feinstein asked about Hillary's accomplishments as senator.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/politics...nton-wasn-t-in-Senate-long-enough-7216431.php

(The TL;DR version is she had to google for an answer).
 
Last edited:
This is too funny not to post it.

Yeah, yeah, conservative blog, but it's still hilarious.'

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/...y-clinton-accomplished-as-secretary-of-state/

The unfair treatment of Hillary Clinton, brought about simply because the poor woman wants to be President, simply has to stop. All of these pestering questions, one after another, are obviously signs of hatred from people who are jealous of her many accomplishments. Or at least that’s the current line of defense being taken by the Ready for Hillary camp these days. But what were those accomplishments again? As Legal Insurrection points out, that’s an unfair question which is only being brought up by the aforementioned haters.

Expecting a Commander in Chief to have some kind of accomplishments that show their qualifications before getting hired for the job is reasonable, right? Maybe, just not if those accomplishments happened while serving has the head of the State Department, according to U.S. News and World Report’s Susan Milligan.

On Hardball with Chris Matthews’ Milligan said the question posed to the Iowa Democratic panel was “unfair.”

“I think most people could not look at a Secretary of State and point to an accomplishment. Frankly, mostly what a Secretary of State does is keep something from becoming a massive crisis so, that in a way wasn’t a terribly fair question,” said Milligan.

Chris Matthews helpfully agreed with Ms. Milligan, noting that Barack Obama didn’t really have any serious accomplishments to point to when he was elected either. Point taken, sir.
 
Ah, accomplishments. Good question!

Let's hear the list of accomplishments in the foreign policy arena of Mr. Trump and Mr. Gary Johnson.

barfo
 
Reading the transcript of today's (?) libertarian party debate.

MR. PETERSON: THE OLD WHO WILL BUILD THE ROADS. RHODES, ROADS. WHERE WE ARE GOING WE DON'T NEED ROADS. [APPLAUSE] THE TRUTH IS IN THE FUTURE WE WILL HAVE A JET PACK. THEY DON'T SEE A FUTURE WHERE FREEDOM CAN SOLVE THE PROBLEMS THAT ARE CREATED BY GOVERNMENT. THE FREE MARKET CAN SOLVE THESE PROBLEMS. TAKE A LOOK AT HURRICANE KATRINA WHEN THERE WAS NO ELECTRICITY. PEOPLE STEPPED IN AND STARTED OFFERING GENERATORS. THEY ARE CHARGING FOR THESE GENERATORS MORE THAN THE FREE MARKET BUT THEY CALLED THEM PRICE GOUGERS. SUPPLY AND DEMAND WORK. I'M OUT OF TIME. WHO WILL BUILD THE ROADS? WE DON'T NEED ROADS THROUGH WE DON'T NEED GOVERNMENT TO BUILD ROADS
Click to expand...

DR. FELDMAN: WE CAN BE FAIR AND IS THEY WILL NOT TRADE WITH US, WE WILL TRADE WITH SOMEBODY ELSE. I GIVE MY BARBER MONEY AND HE GIVES ME HAIRCUTS. HE NEVER GIVES ME MONEY. WE NEED FREE-TRADE AND IT DOES NOT NEED AN AGREEMENT. [APPLAUSE]
Click to expand...

LARRY: GOVERNOR JOHNSON, WAS IT WRONG FOR AMERICA TO INTERVENE IN WORLD WAR I AND WORLD WAR II?

MR. JOHNSON: I DO NOT KNOW. [APPLAUSE]
Click to expand...

MR. MCAFEE: I HAVE BEEN IMPRISONED FOR DRUG USE, THAT HAS NOT STOPPED ME OR DID NOT UNTIL THE AGE OF 38, IT CANNOT STOP ME FROM USING DRUGS. NOTHING WILL. NEITHER WOULD I USE MORE IF IT WAS FREE. I USED AS MUCH AS MY BODY WOULD TOLERATE.
Click to expand...

barfo
 
barfo said:
Ah, accomplishments. Good question!

Let's hear the list of accomplishments in the foreign policy arena of Mr. Trump and Mr. Gary Johnson.

barfo
Click to expand...

Neither were secretary of state. What were Hiliar's accomplishments as governor of New Mexico?
 
barfo said:
Reading the transcript of today's (?) libertarian party debate.









barfo
Click to expand...

I see no fault in anything you quoted. Very food quotes even.

After hurricane Katrina, several stories were about price gougers who loaded up their trucks with bottled water to sell to the hurricane victims. If there were no opportunity to gouge, there'd be no water for the victims at all.

Government didn't do shit, and that has nothing to do with W and his people or the democrat who was mayor or the democrat who was governor.
 
Gary Johnson has a very expressive face.

I like that in a third party candidate.

barfo
 
I don't really care, of course, I'm just here to see the show, but it seems to me that your party just sold its soul for a few more votes, Denny.

Having two republicans on the ticket will certainly make it easier for republican voters who don't like trump to vote for the L-ticket.

Best case, the Libertarian ticket outpolls Trump and the LP now becomes the old Republican party (slogan: "Not your father's republican party". Reality: "Your father's republican party).
Worst case, it's still irrelevant, plus people consider it a weird Republican splinter party.

barfo
 
Two former governors lends the ticket more credibility, in theory.

When I first became a Libertarian in 1988, I remember arguing with other members that we might be better off focusing our efforts trying to elect a governor of a state like California. Or a senate seat.

Having a position where our policy ideas would be heard would create more Libertarians. Ron Paul proved me right.

I'm not so sure about Weld. Johnson is the man, though.

It's not a weird republican anything. Not much different than Sanders' relationship with the criminal party.
 
Is New Mexico still a state or is that one of the places Trump wants to build a wall around?
 
Denny Crane said:
It's not a weird republican anything. Not much different than Sanders' relationship with the criminal party.
Click to expand...

Except of course that Sanders isn't going to be the nominee.

Closer, I guess, to Trump's relationship with the _insert insult here_ party.

barfo
 
Hillary Clinton and husband Bill Clinton will be the targets of racketeering charges soon to be brought by the FBI, according to a report from Huffington Post. That article was initially provided at this link. It has since been removed from their site, but is available in its entirety on the Global Research site. The report indicates that FBI Director James Comey will soon present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice that formal charges be brought against The Clinton Foundation. Charges that are included in the recommendation include one alleging the following.

“The Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.”
​
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/3146704/hillary-clinton-to-face-racketeering-charges/#DhmYgrPV7Fqz1MBS.99
 
next we'll hear that the Clintons had a suspicious yard man who has so far been identified only by the initials "HCP".

barfo
 
Huffington Post Removes Article Claiming Hillary Clinton Will Be Indicted

The liberal publication Huffington Post removed an article on its website Sunday claiming that the FBI plans to pursue an indictment against Hillary Clinton on federal racketeering charges.

HuffPo freelance contributor Frank Huguenard, a scientist and public speaker, posted an article on the site’s blog entitled “Hillary Clinton to be Indicted on Federal Racketeering Charges”.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/29/huffington-post-removes/
 
I like the Reddit comments:

"This is a witch hunt"

"Technically it is!"
 
"Blazer forum owner claims to like Reddit better!"
 
This isn’t Whitewater. It’s a huge story
Click to expand...

Well, at least there's finally an admission that Whitewater was a non-story.

Maybe in 25 years or so we'll hear the same thing about the email 'scandal'.

Of course, by then Hillary will have died in jail serving time for killing Vince Foster.

barfo
 
I'm impressed that a part time science blogger breaks the biggest story of the decade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top