Erin Andrews ESPN reporter nude video

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
I watched it. It will do nothing but enhance her popularity.
 
I will admit that I watched it, couldn't help it. Reminds me of when I was about 12 years old, we went to some old guys house to go swimming for a field trip. He had a giant indoor pool. Dude lived out in the country but somehow he made money renting out this pool or something. I don't remember much but I was a young kid then.

Anyhoooooo....

He had home built changing rooms that could only fit one person at a time. They had lights but were made out of plywood. Kinda rickety if memory serves. So, I brushed up against the light switch and the light turned off. Before I could find the switch to turn it back on, I noticed light coming through a crack between the boards.

I COULD SEE RIGHT IN THE GIRLS CHANGING ROOM.

Anyway, after about 20 minutes people were banging on the door telling me to hurry up:pimp:

As I got older, I realized that the old perv had to have known about this. :tsktsk:

Believe it or not, whenever I am in a hotel bathroom taking a shower I randomly flip the bird at the mirror and the corners of the room. Just want them to know that I know I might be being watched. I bet they flip the camera off right quick when the get a sight of me. :drumroll:
 
god damn that ass is so fucking beautiful. kind of feel sick but wow at her ass. just wow...
 
PapaG said:
I can't bring myself to watch the video. I don't think I'd feel good about myself after watching it. What an absolute violation of privacy. I bet she feels extremely violated over this incident, and I hope they find out who did it and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

If anybody did this to one of my daughters...
Click to expand...

You are such a good person. Did you look at your "What Would Jesus Do?" wrist-band before you decided if you would watch it or not?

10.jpg
 
ABM said:
Interesting....

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/theh...drews-peephole-pictures-are-privacy-porn.aspx
Click to expand...

"Privacy, it seems, is the new nudity."

New? Voyeurism has been popular for a long, long time. The writer is, bizarrely, trying to explain something that has been common knowledge for...ever? There's an allure for many in getting to see something you weren't supposed to see.

I actually think she gets it wrong. She says this:

It’s not so much a desire to see nudity as it is to see candor, to see what the person looks like when she’s unaware she’s being watched. It’s the impulse behind “Stars: They’re Just Like Us,” and Gawker Stalker.
Click to expand...

I think it's a lot more than that. It's not just a desire to see that "stars are just like real people." It's a desire to take something. Most people can't have sex with Erin Andrews, but they can, now, see her naked against her will. It's a (fleeting) sense of power.
 
Tyler_Hansbrough said:
You are such a good person. Did you look at your "What Would Jesus Do?" wrist-band before you decided if you would watch it or not?

10.jpg
Click to expand...

I don't go to church and I'm not religious. I do recognize consent versus a lack of consent for a video, however.

What was your point? Did you get your jollies watching some poor woman have her privacy invaded by some pervert? I bet you did...
 
PapaG said:
I don't go to church and I'm not religious. I do recognize consent versus a lack of consent for a video, however.

What was your point? Did you get your jollies watching some poor woman have her privacy invaded by some pervert? I bet you did...
Click to expand...

Oh calm down. I was just playing around.
 
Minstrel said:
"Privacy, it seems, is the new nudity."

New? Voyeurism has been popular for a long, long time. The writer is, bizarrely, trying to explain something that has been common knowledge for...ever? There's an allure for many in getting to see something you weren't supposed to see.

I actually think she gets it wrong. She says this:



I think it's a lot more than that. It's not just a desire to see that "stars are just like real people." It's a desire to take something. Most people can't have sex with Erin Andrews, but they can, now, see her naked against her will. It's a (fleeting) sense of power.
Click to expand...

It frankly says more about the person viewing it than it says anything about Erin Andrews. Kind of a litmus test for common decency for me. I realize that's extreme in this environment, but I see nothing at all that can be gained by validating the voyeurism in this video. It's a basic assault on privacy, and I hope Andrews deals with the heckles she'll be getting from morons at sporting events this fall who viewed her.

Edit - not that viewing the tape makes one a moron. I meant that the hecklers, which will appear, are morons.
 
Last edited:
PapaG said:
It frankly says more about the person viewing it than it says anything about Erin Andrews.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. It says nothing about Andrews, except that she was unlucky.

Kind of a litmus test for common decency for me. I realize that's extreme in this environment, but I see nothing at all that can be gained by validating the voyeurism in this video.
Click to expand...

I probably wouldn't go that far, since I think mere curiosity is also pretty prevalent. What drives this as a story is the "desirable woman in a helpless position" which I do think is a pretty unfortunate part of human nature, the excitement generated from seeing someone helpless or humiliated (and it's widespread...in a more minor form, it's part of why lots of sports fans enjoy seeing Ewing getting posterized by Jordan). But once it's become a big story, I don't think anyone who gets curious and views it is a bad person.
 
PapaG said:
It frankly says more about the person viewing it than it says anything about Erin Andrews. Kind of a litmus test for common decency for me. I realize that's extreme in this environment, but I see nothing at all that can be gained by validating the voyeurism in this video. It's a basic assault on privacy, and I hope Andrews deals with the heckles she'll be getting from morons at sporting events this fall who viewed her.

Edit - not that viewing the tape makes one a moron. I meant that the hecklers, which will appear, are morons.
Click to expand...

IMO, people like you who say they wont watch the video, and you are such a good person for not watching, and you are a moral hero, and you would never do anything so bad in your life, and you just go on and on and on about how bad it is to watch a video like this, how dare us... you are the person I would watch out for. Not someone who watched the video. Beware the chi-mo!
 
Tyler_Hansbrough said:
IMO, people like you who say they wont watch the video, and you are such a good person for not watching, and you are a moral hero, and you would never do anything so bad in your life, and you just go on and on and on about how bad it is to watch a video like this, how dare us... you are the person I would watch out for. Not someone who watched the video. Beware the chi-mo!
Click to expand...

So my opinion on an assault on privacy upset you this much? I don't think people watching it are bad people, but they certainly are voyeurs. I suppose I could join in talking about how hot she is, and what she is doing in the video. Then I could be cool! I never said I was a good person, either. Making stuff up to project on me to validate/rationalize your own guilt for watching it? Perhaps...
 
Last edited:
PapaG said:
So my opinion on an assault on privacy upset you this much? I don't think people watching it are bad people, but they certainly are voyeurs. I suppose I could join in talking about how hot she is, and what she is doing in the video. Then I could be cool! I never said I was a good person, either. Making stuff up to project on me to validate/rationalize your own guilt for watching it? Perhaps...
Click to expand...

I am not upset! I just wouldn't let you babysit my kid!
 
PapaG said:
Why? Because I don't want to watch a woman unknowingly be filmed naked through a peephole?

OK boss, whatever you say.
Click to expand...

I think it is because people like me who watched the video couldn't imagine why you wouldn't. We like to think we are normal so one would think that you were hiding something by not admitting to watching this.

I just wouldn't let a man babysit my children if I had them. The statistics aren't in favor of that anyway.
 
Denny Crane said:
You won't get banned or even hassled if you post a link like that, as long as you warn people "this link is not safe for work."

:cheers:
Click to expand...

Because the title, Erin Andrews ESPN reporter nude video, gives no indication of what the content may be.
 
Cake said:
Because the title, Erin Andrews ESPN reporter nude video, gives no indication of what the content may be.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I thought it was her report on Ghana's Nude-Mula soccer team. Boy, was I shocked.

barfo
 
bodyman5001 said:
I think it is because people like me who watched the video couldn't imagine why you wouldn't. We like to think we are normal so one would think that you were hiding something by not admitting to watching this.

I just wouldn't let a man babysit my children if I had them. The statistics aren't in favor of that anyway.
Click to expand...

I'm admitting something by thinking it is wrong to film a person, without her knowledge, in the privacy of her own hotel room, let alone her being naked?

Projecting blame/deviant behavior on to me may make you seem normal in your mind, but I'm guessing that most of America has not watched the video, nor do they care to watch the video knowing how it was filmed. Odd board. People who think the film is a violation of privacy, and then choose not to watch it, are the weirdos. OK there.

And I have kids. I don't need to babysit other peoples' kids. I hope you don't have kids, since you seem to think that viewing an assault on privacy is normal behavior. Perhaps you should have someone film your wife without her knowing it, in the nude, and spread it around the internet. That'd be fun, huh?
 
Last edited:
barfo said:
Exactly. I thought it was her report on Ghana's Nude-Mula soccer team. Boy, was I shocked.

barfo
Click to expand...


Those vids are floating around the net, as well. Unfortunately (again) for her, she was typecast to do the report.
 
PapaG said:
And I have kids. I don't need to babysit other peoples' kids.
Click to expand...

So if you didn't have kids, you would need to babysit other people's kids?

barfo
 
PapaG said:
I'm admitting something by thinking it is wrong to film a person, without her knowledge, in the privacy of her own hotel room, let alone her being naked?

Projecting blame/deviant behavior on to me may make you seem normal in your mind, but I'm guessing that most of America has not watched the video, nor do they care to watch the video knowing how it was filmed. Odd board. People who think the film is a violation of privacy, and then choose not to watch it, are the weirdos. OK there.

And I have kids. I don't need to babysit other peoples' kids. I hope you don't have kids, since you seem to think that viewing an assault on privacy is normal behavior. Perhaps you should have someone film your wife without her knowing it, in the nude, and spread it around the internet. That'd be fun, huh?
Click to expand...


I guess I shouldn't try and talk to you. I was trying to help you understand what he was thinking by saying that. I think it is painfully obvious that I am think it is deviant behavior to watch the video. I personally believe that there are people who wouldn't want to watch it. I can just understand why some people would think a straight male would be lying if he said he wasn't interested in it.

When I clicked on the thread the first thing I thought was that it was wrong to watch it. Then I figured that every news station would be talking about it and showing blurry clips of it. RIGHT ON THAT PART.

Then I found out that she knew about the video and I figured that she won't know that I, ME PERSONALLY watched it. It wouldn't hurt her any more than she had already been hurt if I watched it.

This is where you can turn it around on me and say I am making excuses, but I already admitted somewhere else in this thread that her knowing about it took all the fun out of it for me. There is way better stuff on the internet that is in glorious HD VIDEO for me to watch.

Just the other day I was telling my mom how bad this country is getting. She asked what I meant and I told her this...

"Mom, let's just say that there are plenty of things on the internet that entertain me that I feel should be illegal"


Seriously, we won't let girls under 21 drink but they can get paid a few hundred bucks or so to do horrible things on video?

Can you imagine some guy bringing his new wife back home to meet his friends and one of them had a subscription to her porn site?

Stuff like that is why I don't want kids, not that they would have to worry about me.
 
bodyman5001 said:
I guess I shouldn't try and talk to you. I was trying to help you understand what he was thinking by saying that. I think it is painfully obvious that I am think it is deviant behavior to watch the video. I personally believe that there are people who wouldn't want to watch it. I can just understand why some people would think a straight male would be lying if he said he wasn't interested in it.

When I clicked on the thread the first thing I thought was that it was wrong to watch it. Then I figured that every news station would be talking about it and showing blurry clips of it. RIGHT ON THAT PART.

Then I found out that she knew about the video and I figured that she won't know that I, ME PERSONALLY watched it. It wouldn't hurt her any more than she had already been hurt if I watched it.

This is where you can turn it around on me and say I am making excuses, but I already admitted somewhere else in this thread that her knowing about it took all the fun out of it for me. There is way better stuff on the internet that is in glorious HD VIDEO for me to watch.

Just the other day I was telling my mom how bad this country is getting. She asked what I meant and I told her this...

"Mom, let's just say that there are plenty of things on the internet that entertain me that I feel should be illegal"


Seriously, we won't let girls under 21 drink but they can get paid a few hundred bucks or so to do horrible things on video?

Can you imagine some guy bringing his new wife back home to meet his friends and one of them had a subscription to her porn site?

Stuff like that is why I don't want kids, not that they would have to worry about me.
Click to expand...

I misinterpreted your initial post to me. :cheers:
 
PapaG said:
I misinterpreted your initial post to me. :cheers:
Click to expand...

:cheers:

Do you think I am wacko because I always click on links out of curiousity? There was a teenage girl killed in a Porsche in California a couple of years ago and the pictures of the crash site got onto the internet.

People warned not to click the link if you had a weak stomach but I just had to do it almost as if it were a dare.

I still wish I hadn't, I will never forget what I saw. I know that people have to see stuff like that every day as part of their jobs and I think they are underpaid now, no matter what kind of money they make.

On the other hand, I have more of a stomach for stuff like that now and it might pay off in an emergency..who knows?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Featured content

Back
Top