ESPN League Pass Watchability Rankings......Part 1

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I dont like the spurs or Pops schtick at all, but I believe they deserve a higher score for watchability. They will play super well coached ball, and thats good basketball to me.
 
I dont like the spurs or Pops schtick at all, but I believe they deserve a higher score for watchability. They will play super well coached ball, and thats good basketball to me.
It is, but they have been SO boring to watch during their run. Winning basketball isn't always exciting. Thats why I think the Ws have caught on. They are a blast to watch whether you like em or not. Thats why I like watching OKC. Russ is just a nut job out there, flying all over the place. Just flat out fun to watch.
 
It is, but they have been SO boring to watch during their run. Winning basketball isn't always exciting. Thats why I think the Ws have caught on. They are a blast to watch whether you like em or not. Thats why I like watching OKC. Russ is just a nut job out there, flying all over the place. Just flat out fun to watch.
I understand exactly why people say that, and I GS’s barrage of 3’s and all that is fun for most fans. I agree that Russ is fun too. I guess I never found SAS to be that boring, when their moving without the ball, making good passes they just play basketball so, “the right way”. They definitely dont have the huge dunks and the things you associate with exciting basketball, I just think its great basketball to watch. For me it would be like 8-10th.
 
It is, but they have been SO boring to watch during their run. Winning basketball isn't always exciting. Thats why I think the Ws have caught on. They are a blast to watch whether you like em or not. Thats why I like watching OKC. Russ is just a nut job out there, flying all over the place. Just flat out fun to watch.

I admit I enjoy watching him blow 4th quarter leads. I especially enjoy it when it happens against the Blazers.

BNM
 
I understand exactly why people say that, and I GS’s barrage of 3’s and all that is fun for most fans. I agree that Russ is fun too. I guess I never found SAS to be that boring, when their moving without the ball, making good passes they just play basketball so, “the right way”. They definitely dont have the huge dunks and the things you associate with exciting basketball, I just think its great basketball to watch. For me it would be like 8-10th.
Don't get me wrong. As a fan of the game I love the fundamentals, they just aren't very fun to watch. I believe some of the lowest rated NBA Finals were the Spurs years unfortunately .
 
I admit I enjoy watching him blow 4th quarter leads. I especially enjoy it when it happens against the Blazers.

BNM
So I see you have not matured in the offseason, and will continue to throw shade at myself and my love of all things Russ.
 
Don't get me wrong. As a fan of the game I love the fundamentals, they just aren't very fun to watch. I believe some of the lowest rated NBA Finals were the Spurs years unfortunately .
Is fair I suppose. I think the Spurs hear series’ had got rating’s but that probably had a lot to do with Lebron / Wade.
 
It is, but they have been SO boring to watch during their run. Winning basketball isn't always exciting. Thats why I think the Ws have caught on. They are a blast to watch whether you like em or not. Thats why I like watching OKC. Russ is just a nut job out there, flying all over the place. Just flat out fun to watch.

I liked watching the Spurs 5 years ago when thy lead the league in AST/G, yet didn't have any one individual player averaging more than 5.7. They also had seven players average between 9.1 and 16.7 ppg and were 3rd in the league in team defense. That was such a great display of team basketball on both sides of the ball. So much ball and player movement on offense and seamless switching on defense. They just all seemed to function as one cohesive being rather than five individuals.

BNM
 
I liked watching the Spurs 5 years ago when thy lead the league in AST/G, yet didn't have any one individual player averaging more than 5.7. They also had seven players average between 9.1 and 16.7 ppg and were 3rd in the league in team defense. That was such a great display of team basketball on both sides of the ball. So much ball and player movement on offense and seamless switching on defense. They just all seemed to function as one cohesive being rather than five individuals.

BNM
And then they ruined it all by signing Aldridge.
 
The Blazers are my main thing but I play to watch ta least as many Philly games. It's so much fun to watch a core with that much promise grow playing together.
 
#12 ain't bad right guys? I'm surprised we made it that high honestly.
 
Can't argue with the Top 4. Funny one is the Bulls at 6. Saying they are fun to watch because of all the ejections and bad play.
 
#12 ain't bad right guys? I'm surprised we made it that high honestly.
We were #8 last year, and just lost Ed, right? And Mo still has the contract bonus for 3pt%, right?
Portland runs much of the same beautiful, flowing read-and-react offense the Mavericks use, though the Blazers have superstars who punctuate it with flair -- or bust the hell out of it when they feel like doing their thing.
Damian Lillard has Curry range. C.J. McCollum is a fast-twitch phantom, always on the move, knees bent, ready to change direction. He might tote the league's deepest arsenal of dribble moves and in-between shots; McCollum hit an incredible 52.2 percent of shots taken between 8 and 16 feet from the rim, second-best among 105 rotation players who tried at least 1.5 shots per game from that ultra-tricky range, per NBA.com. There's a reason I've called him the NBA's Dean Malenko.
Jusuf Nurkic brought some needed brutality and scoring, and nearly matched Mason Plumlee as a pick-and-roll playmaker. The Blazers' art is all great, though their new red jersey, with monochrome black lettering, shares the Kevin-Arnold-In-Gym-Class look with Indiana's yellow duds:
Maurice Harkless earns a bonus again if he shoots 35 percent from deep, per ESPN.com's Bobby Marks, raising all sorts of hilarious possibilities if he's on the border late in the season. Kevin Calabro is an NBA legend on play-by-play, and his partner, Lamar Hurd, is going to be an industry star.
 
I know it wont be popular but I dont think the Blazers last year played a great brand of basketball for ‘watchability’, a lot of iso’s, not great passing, terrible on the break. The redeeming qualities were that Dame and CJ were phenomenal watches when they got going. I could see why Blazer fans keep tuning in. Nationally though I understand why they’re not higher and Im a little surprised they arent lower.
 
I know it wont be popular but I dont think the Blazers last year played a great brand of basketball for ‘watchability’, a lot of iso’s, not great passing, terrible on the break. The redeeming qualities were that Dame and CJ were phenomenal watches when they got going. I could see why Blazer fans keep tuning in. Nationally though I understand why they’re not higher and Im a little surprised they arent lower.

They probably also found us boring last year because we won too much on national TV (9-2), but at least the SAC game where Dame scored 50 points in 29:29 was on national TV.

BNM
 
Calabro and Hurd helps.

Lowe is a big fan of both.
 
Calabro and Hurd helps.

Lowe is a big fan of both.

Boy, I'll say. This is Lowe's opening sentence from the Blazers 2016-17 rankings:

"All hail the long overdue return of Kevin Calabro to a permanent play-by-play spot! With that, all the frills in Portland are perfect."

He had us ranked No. 9 that year and the play-by-play guy was his No. 1 reason.

BNM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top