ESPN needs to close

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PrimeTime @ Jul 18 2007, 12:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Your stupid. ESPN is hardly the ''ghetto nigga'' network. They have 3 black people on staff I can recall out of at least 150 analysts. God forbid they have a black analyst when 75% of major sports involves black people.</div>BBW has one.I think they should split it up. 30 Minutes for each sport and not being called sportscenter but like seprate broad casting so we dont have to wait. Like NBA would have 30 minutes then MLB will and so on consuming the same amount of time of SC
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Mobruler @ Jul 18 2007, 03:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>OP lost all credibility when they said Tim Legler was a good analyst.</div>
I personally don't mind Legs either. I don't think he's the best analyst in the world, but I think he's better than the rest of their crew. I think Stephen A. is repulsive, but entertaining. I don't mind Stephen A. at all. I don't like Greg Anthony much, and Mark Jackson states the obvious and/or re-states something said right before him every single time he speaks. He also makes a lot of terrible jokes. Mike Wilbon... enough said. The guy doesn't really know what he's talking about, and Jon Barry is clearly the biggest piece of white trash ESPN has ever hired.

Hubie Brown is the man, though.
 
It's to bad FSN doesn't step up and do some shows like SportsCenter and everything else instead of airing a bunch of garbage all day long. Sign some talent and build a network which can compete with ESPN! The only real reason ESPN is so successful is because they have no competition. I love my hometeam but say after a Tigers game..why do I want to watch replays of the game I just watched after it?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nitro1118 @ Jul 18 2007, 05:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Harold Reynolds evidently was sexually harassing some girl or whatever, so they fired him.</div>I'm pretty sure most people know that, but the problem is that supposedly it was for hugging someone. Furthermore, Sean Salisbury, an NFL analyst, was only SUSPENDED for showing women pictures on his phone of his wang. Seems rather hypocritical of the network. Reynolds has sued ESPN, so we'll see how long this lasts.Reynolds is the man. Women should want to get banged by him.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticBalla32 @ Jul 18 2007, 05:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Mike Wilbon... enough said. The guy doesn't really know what he's talking about, and Jon Barry is clearly the biggest piece of white trash ESPN has ever hired.</div>Yeah, that's the part that drives me nuts about "Who's Now?" It's not who has won or the setup of it, it's the analysis. Who gives a F*ck what Herbstreet, Keyshawn, and Mike Wilbon think? All three of them chose Tony Parker because he's married to Longoria. Nevermind that Federer is quite possibly the BEST PLAYER IN HIS SPORT EVER EVER.And Jon Barry drives me nuts, he's such a biased fucktard.
 
I know he doesn't work for ESPN, but Joe Buck is probably one of the worst announcers I have ever heard. He's made some good calls in his time, but other than that he doesn't know what he's talking about and he can be extremely biased towards one team. He just annoys the hell out of me...
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SBoyd415 @ Jul 18 2007, 07:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I know he doesn't work for ESPN, but Joe Buck is probably one of the worst announcers I have ever heard. He's made some good calls in his time, but other than that he doesn't know what he's talking about and he can be extremely biased towards one team. He just annoys the hell out of me...</div>I disagree. I don't like him for FOOTBALL at all. But Buck for baseball is really great. McCarver is the dude on Fox that makes me ticked.
 
I don't remember which guy it was, but I remember I used to watch Saturday baseball and they would always make a comment about how such and such was a bad baserunning mistake, and half the time they were wrong. They would say it literally every week, so I guess they thought it made them seem intelligent.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Combs @ Jul 18 2007, 04:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I disagree. I don't like him for FOOTBALL at all. But Buck for baseball is really great. McCarver is the dude on Fox that makes me ticked.</div>He was incredibly biased during the Angels-Giants World Series. Every mistake by the Giants was basically called a huge blunder while every mistake by the Angels was just bad luck. Ever since then I've hated him (and not just because of that series) but because he's too opinionated while he's broadcasting...
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SBoyd415 @ Jul 18 2007, 04:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>He was incredibly biased during the Angels-Giants World Series. Every mistake by the Giants was basically called a huge blunder while every mistake by the Angels was just bad luck. Ever since then I've hated him (and not just because of that series) but because he's too opinionated while he's broadcasting...</div>Just as biased as the Fox Announcers the last time the Dodgers and Giants played eachother? The on one National television. The announcers were so pro-Giants, I had to watch it on Mute.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SirLaker @ Jul 18 2007, 05:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Just as biased as the Fox Announcers the last time the Dodgers and Giants played eachother? The on one National television. The announcers were so pro-Giants, I had to watch it on Mute.</div>I wouldn't know, I was at that game
laugh.gif
But I don't see how he can be pro-Giants during that series, we got beat pretty bad
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SBoyd415 @ Jul 18 2007, 05:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I wouldn't know, I was at that game
laugh.gif
But I don't see how he can be pro-Giants during that series, we got beat pretty bad</div>The game went down to the wire...Giants came back. I am pretty sure we are talking about the same game. They were pro Giants because every mistake a Dodger would make, they would replay it a million times and say how bad of a mistake it was. That got annoying. Not only that, but they kept on and on about how Giant Fans are more supportive of their team and take the rivalry more seriously. That pissed me off. Especially, when we have the higher attendance rate.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SirLaker @ Jul 18 2007, 05:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>The game went down to the wire...Giants came back. I am pretty sure we are talking about the same game. They were pro Giants because every mistake a Dodger would make, they would replay it a million times and say how bad of a mistake it was. That got annoying. Not only that, but they kept on and on about how Giant Fans are more supportive of their team and take the rivalry more seriously. That pissed me off. Especially, when we have the higher attendance rate.</div>If you're talking about the series we got swept, yes. The comeback game where we lost in the 14th is the only game I think of where the Giants had a strong point. Joe Buck is one of those terrible FOX announcers that chooses a side and commentates with bias. As for the attendance thing, your stadium has about 16,000 more seats. PS- At least they were right when they said Giants fans are more supportive :winkglasses:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top