FBI prevenst car bomb at Pioneer Courthouse Square

[TradeNurkicNow]

ISLAM IS THE RELGION OF PEACE

 

[MrJayremmie]

Throw in Iran and we've got the Axis of Evil covered.

Reminds me of this...

Bitter after being snubbed for membership in the "Axis of Evil," Libya, China, and Syria today announced they had formed the "Axis of Just as Evil," which they said would be way eviler than that stupid Iran-Iraq-North Korea axis President Bush warned of his State of the Union address.
Membership closed

Axis of Evil members, however, immediately dismissed the new axis as having, for starters, a really dumb name. "Right. They are Just as Evil... in their dreams!" declared North Korean leader Kim Jong-il. "Everybody knows we're the best evils... best at being evil... we're the best."

Diplomats from Syria denied they were jealous over being excluded, although they conceded they did ask if they could join the Axis of Evil.

"They told us it was full," said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

"An Axis can't have more than three countries," explained Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. "This is not my rule, it's tradition. In World War II you had Germany, Italy, and Japan in the evil Axis. So you can only have three. And a secret handshake. Ours is wicked cool."

THE AXIS PANDEMIC

International reaction to Bush's Axis of Evil declaration was swift, as within minutes, France surrendered.

Elsewhere, peer-conscious nations rushed to gain triumvirate status in what became a game of geopolitical chairs. Cuba, Sudan, and Serbia said they had formed the Axis of Somewhat Evil, forcing Somalia to join with Uganda and Myanmar in the Axis of Occasionally Evil, while Bulgaria, Indonesia and Russia established the Axis of Not So Much Evil Really As Just Generally Disagreeable.

With the criteria suddenly expanded and all the desirable clubs filling up, Sierra Leone, El Salvador, and Rwanda applied to be called the Axis of Countries That Aren't the Worst But Certainly Won't Be Asked to Host the Olympics; Canada, Mexico, and Australia formed the Axis of Nations That Are Actually Quite Nice But Secretly Have Nasty Thoughts About America, while Spain, Scotland, and New Zealand established the Axis of Countries That Sometimes Ask Sheep to Wear Lipstick.

"That's not a threat, really, just something we like to do," said Scottish Executive First Minister Jack McConnell.

While wondering if the other nations of the world weren't perhaps making fun of him, a cautious Bush granted approval for most axes, although he rejected the establishment of the Axis of Countries Whose Names End in "Guay," accusing one of its members of filing a false application. Officials from Paraguay, Uruguay, and Chadguay denied the charges.

Israel, meanwhile, insisted it didn't want to join any Axis, but privately, world leaders said that's only because no one asked them.

 

[MrJayremmie]

LMAO at the "Within minutes, France surrendered" part.

 

[MARIS61]

In what other crime would this argument work? Did they find this guy randomly on the street and say, "psst... Hey kid? Yeah, you! Ever wanted to blow up whitey?"

What a month... Cam Newton is innocent because his dad was the one who broke the rules, and now this guy is innocent because the government tricked him into wanting to blow up thousands of people.

Not innocent, but certainly not more guilty than the Feds who suggested, designed, arranged, and orchestrated his training while supplying him with everything he needed and directing/helping him every step of the way. This kid couldn't lift a candy bar from 7-11 without the Feds help.

 

[Haakzilla]

Contrived Christmas Tree Terror Plot to Stampede Portland into Accepting FBI Takeover

Kurt Nimmo
January 17, 2011

The would-be Christmas tree bomber, Mohamed Osman Mohamud.

Residents of Portland, Oregon, recently attended a forum on the question of whether the city should rejoin the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force. The city withdrew its task force membership five years ago after the Justice Department turned down a city request for oversight over the JTTF.

The decision followed revelations in 2002 that the FBI and the Portland Police kept thousands of “red squad” style police files on political activists. Since 1981, Oregon law has barred police surveillance of political groups in the absence of criminal activity.

“Both the FBI and the Portland Police Bureau have a 70-year history of carrying out surveillance on thousands of innocent individuals and organizations because of their political, religious or social activities – or because of their race or national origin – rather than because there was evidence of criminal activity,” PortlandInsight reported prior to the forum.

In November, Portland was in the news when Mohamed Osman Mohamud was arrested for allegedly plotting to blow up a Christmas tree in Portland’s Pioneer Courthouse Square. It soon was revealed that the FBI had provided a fake bomb, van, and cell phone (to be used as a detonator) in the incident.

Stephen Sady, assistant federal public defender, said the arrest of the 19-year-old native of Somalia “was obviously timed for maximum impact and maximum publicity.” Sady said the FBI had groomed the defendant and there was “potential for entrapment.”

It can now be said it was also used to stampede Portland into accepting the presence of the FBI and its Joint Terrorism Task Force.

The FBI is notorious for recruiting clueless patsies in bogus terrorism cases. Over the last few years, dozens of such cases have provided the government with a diet of propaganda fodder in the fake war on manufactured terror.

In December, the FBI set-up Antonio Martinez, a recent Muslim convert, by providing him with a fake car bomb. In September, America’s preeminent political police force entrapped Sami Samir Hassoun in a contrived bomb plot in the Wrigleyville area of Chicago. Once again, the FBI provided a fake bomb. In October, four men were convicted in a plot to blow up synagogues in New York. The hapless victims cooperated with an informer working for the FBI who posed as a terrorist and supplied the men with inert bombs and Stinger missile tubes. In November, the FBI entrapped Farooque Ahmed in a bomb plot invented by the FBI who sent out informers posing as al-Qaeda members.

There are numerous such cases going back decades. The most famous case involves the FBI plot to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993. The FBI allowed a bomb plot to go forward and the explosion killed six people and injured more than a thousand.

We Are Change Portland mentioned the first World Trade Center bombing during the forum with city officials and the FBI (see video below).

[video=youtube;O9wPgyTn8vQ]

An op-ed published in The Oregonian last week argues in favor of a resumption of FBI JTTF activities in Portland. The obviously staged Christmas tree terror plot was mentioned: “The averted attack during Portland’s Christmas tree lighting ceremony has touched off a debate about the city’s decision, six years ago, to withdraw from the task force. That withdrawal was, clearly, unwise.”

The FBI orchestrated event was cooked up not only as yet another sideshow in the never-ending war against manufactured terror, but also as a stunt to frighten the people of Portland into accepting the presence of the FBI.

If the FBI is allowed back into Portland, the city’s residents can expect the agency – acting as America’s political police force – to resume its effort to attack the establishment’s political enemies.

The FBI does not exist to combat kidnappers and bank robbers, as advertised. It exists to neutralize and destroy all political opposition, as its former director, J. Edgar Hoover, so famously said when COINTELPRO was rolled out fifty years ago.

...don't do it Portland!

 

[BrianFromWA]

So you're FOR increased ability for those demonstrating willingness to murder thousands to plan and operate outside of legal surveillance? Interesting position. I tend to disagree.

 

[MARIS61]

So you're FOR increased ability for those demonstrating willingness to murder thousands to plan and operate outside of legal surveillance? Interesting position. I tend to disagree.

No, he's against allowing the FBI to continue doing exacly that. They are easily the most anti-American hate-group in history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

When members of the military aren't even aware of very publicly covered crimes against the country from within, crimes that were published in every form of media available and hearings that condemned the FBI as a subversive rogue agency committing treasonous crimes against the Constitution...
...it should be clear why I have no faith that they act in any way to preserve my freedoms.

 

[BrianFromWA]

We preserve your freedoms under civilian control.

Now granted, I know that you think you have reason to hate the military, but if you have a problem with the military you need to talk to your governmental representation. A quick look at the Constitution and US code will tell you anything you'd like to know about all the measures in place to hinder your ability to intelligently drag the military's name through the mud on domestic or law enforcement matters.

Which "hearings that condemned the FBI" are you talking about? Which "treasonous crimes" were you talking about? Then again, since your definition of treason in the past hasn't exactly matched up with what treason is defined as, maybe it won't help anyway.

Are you suggesting I should be prosecuting the FBI? Or that I, as a citizen, shouldn't want people who demonstrate willingness to murder thousands to be under surveillance and stopped from doing so? If so, we're going to disagree here. And I have law on my side, not ramblings from another parallel "wish-it-could-be-this-way" universe.

 

[Haakzilla]

...did you even read about COINTELPRO? Or do you really think they just stopped all of these tactics in 1971?

 

[BrianFromWA]

What is it with all the condescension going around? Yes, I read Maris's wikipedia site about COINTELPRO. I saw how the FBI was charged with investigation of people for political reasons, both left and right. Gotcha. They FBI investigated people. That's bad, I guess. Now, are you going to answer MY question? I've asked it twice now, and received two painfully ignorant responses.

Are you suggesting that I, as a citizen, shouldn't want people who demonstrate willingness to murder thousands to be under surveillance and stopped from doing so?

So you're FOR increased ability for those demonstrating willingness to murder thousands to plan and operate outside of legal surveillance?

I'm sure we'll disagree, but I'd rather have criminals bent on murdering large amounts of US citizens if given the opportunity ("set up", in the parlance of the hatchet jobs referenced in the wiki article against other gov't agencies) found, investigated, arrested and put away (or killed, depending on the laws of the place they live); regardless of their age, level of stupidity, political beliefs, etc. But that's just me.

 

[MARIS61]

What is it with all the condescension going around? Yes, I read Maris's wikipedia site about COINTELPRO. I saw how the FBI was charged with investigation of people for political reasons, both left and right. Gotcha. They FBI investigated people. That's bad, I guess.

They assassinated people. Guess you didn't read it.

 

[Haakzilla]

Are you suggesting that I, as a citizen, shouldn't want people who demonstrate willingness to murder thousands to be under surveillance and stopped from doing so?

So you're FOR increased ability for those demonstrating willingness to murder thousands to plan and operate outside of legal surveillance?

I'm sure we'll disagree, but I'd rather have criminals bent on murdering large amounts of US citizens if given the opportunity ("set up", in the parlance of the hatchet jobs referenced in the wiki article against other gov't agencies) found, investigated, arrested and put away (or killed, depending on the laws of the place they live); regardless of their age, level of stupidity, political beliefs, etc. But that's just me.

I am suggesting that you, as a US citizen, should not be fearful of "terrorism". However, I am suggesting that you should be VERY FEARFUL of false flag terrorism and sacrificing your rights as a US citizen in lieu of this false sense of security that you feel the JTTF is going to provide...or any other gov't agency for that matter!

Spy on everyone, the innocent have nothing to hide...privacy is meaningless nowadays with so much terror and evil going around...right?

On a similarly related topic, do you actually believe the "official" story of the WTC Bombing 1993? Oklahoma City bombing story? The events of 9/11/01? Anthrax scares? London train bombs? Or any of the other "terrorist" plots in the last decade?
__________________________
The Patriot Act...NO THANK YOU!

 

[Haakzilla]

They assassinated people. Guess you didn't read it.

...but they killed the "bad guys" so it is no big deal, nothing to see here, move along.