RoyIsClutch07
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
- Messages
- 1,116
- Likes
- 2
- Points
- 38
Again:
Doesn't that seem even more risky to you? Unless we are completely bombing at some point of the season, I just can't see Nate getting fired.
You are assuming that
1.) The team has given up on Nate.
Response: The team has proven time and time again that it won't and it ain't going to sell out for Nate McMillan. The only way this team is going to win something significant is if they start to and consistantly do this.
2.) They will embrace the new coach.
Respnose: I think they will embrace a popular assistant. Monty Williams is awfully popular
3.) The new coach is better than Nate.
Response: We won't know that until we give it a try. However, I would place the interim label on the new head coach. And if he ain't the answer at seasons end then I would go out and find the answer.
4.) The team can learn a new system on the fly.
Response: If it's a current assistant. More than likely the system doesn't change
5.) The new system is significantly better than the one we currently have.
Response: We can hope that the system is more efficient and productive under a new coach
6.) The new coach will utilize Oden and Rudy better.
Reponse: If it's Monty Williams, I have to believe he has learned enough playing under and coaching under Gregg Popavich to understand the value of someone like Greg Oden and Rudy Fernandez. Therefore, he will use them the right way
Last edited:

If GMs always fire coaches after two consecutive bad losses, I would assume that the number of coaches fired over the past decade would be higher.


! He fucking rocks


So funny because it's true.