you two guys have been working this angle really hard in incessant attempts to defend blazer status quo. I guess because you think it's effective?
IMO, this "name a replacement first" or "come up with a plan first" is just a laughable tactic to try and derail people from saying things you don't like
when was the last time a team hired a new head coach before they fired the current one? Yeah, that's a rhetorical question because even the dumbest teams don't put the cart before the horse. And how often are there gaps of weeks or even months between a team firing the coach and hiring another? Here's a shocking fact: Stotts was hired 5 months after Nate was fired. Even more shocking is that Olshey was hired 13 months after Rich Cho was fired, and the franchise didn't suffer at all by not having a GM or head coach. In fact, in those gaps, Portland traded for a 6th pick, thoroughly scouted a target, and then drafted that target, Lillard, who ironically has given 9 years of ass cover to the two guys in charge many people want gone
tell you what, pay me 8 million a year like Olshey and I'll have a plan. Except I won't tell you and if you ask, I'll deflect, condescend, snipe at critics, and then pump out more snake oil. Which points at a reality...you guys don't know what Olshey's plan is other than a guess it's probably more of the same, which you're fine with. Why should any of us tell you our plans when you don't hold Olshey to the same standard?
