First round exits, how will it affect free the offseason?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Further

Guy
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
11,099
Likes
4,039
Points
113
Often, first round and out teams make some substantial moves, also, players who were looking for contending teams may decide they need to move on.

Lakers - Howard needs to make a decision. He can't be happy. Team also needs to decide if it will cut and run on having such high salaries, Kobe, Gasol, Artest

Celtics - Pierce and Garnett are winding down their careers but owed huge sums. Pierce is only guaranteed 5mil and Boston still owned its amnesty. They have some young talent and now may be the time to ditch the vets.

Clippers - Paul wants to win in the playoffs and reportedly gets in arguments with the young players on his team.

Houston - they are in a different position in that they outperformed expectations. But they have a ton of youth and must be thinking they are just a couple moves away from contending. Do they go after Howard even though Asik has shown he isa quality center? Perhaps they go after Paul instead?

Denver - They have a lot of B level talent, but need to get an A level talent. They have to be confused on what to do with their bigs.

Atlanta - josh smith out most likely. How do they use their assets

Bucks - most of their team is at the end of their contracts.




Thoughts in general, and thoughts related to Blazers both welcome.
 
Players I wouldn't mind from each team.

Lakers: Howard (5% chance max?)
Celtics: Bradley (for his D)
Clippers: Barnes (stay away from Jordan)
Rockets: Asik and Parsons (have to be trade obviously)
Nuggets: McGee (but only if they took back Freeland)
Hawks: Korver (What Babbitt wishes he could be)
Bucks: Dalembert (if we go for the Vet 1-2 year signing)

I tried to keep it to somewhat realistic names (except for Howard).
 
Last edited:
Players I wouldn't mind from each team.

Lakers: Howard (5% chance max?)
Celtics: Bradley (for his D)
Clippers: Barnes (stay away from Jordan)
Rockets: Asik and Parsons (have to be trade obviously)
Grizzlies: McGee (but only if they took back Freeland)
Hawks: Korver (What Babbitt wishes he could be)
Bucks: Dalembert (if we go for the Vet 1-2 year signing)

I tried to keep it to somewhat realistic names (except for Howard).

I like the way you break it down
 
Players I wouldn't mind from each team.

Lakers: Howard (5% chance max?)
Celtics: Bradley (for his D)
Clippers: Barnes (stay away from Jordan)
Rockets: Asik and Parsons (have to be trade obviously)
Grizzlies: McGee (but only if they took back Freeland)
Hawks: Korver (What Babbitt wishes he could be)
Bucks: Dalembert (if we go for the Vet 1-2 year signing)

I tried to keep it to somewhat realistic names (except for Howard).

Grizzlies: McGee?

Did you mean to type
Nuggets: McGee
 
Often, first round and out teams make some substantial moves, also, players who were looking for contending teams may decide they need to move on.

Lakers - Howard needs to make a decision. He can't be happy. Team also needs to decide if it will cut and run on having such high salaries, Kobe, Gasol, Artest

Celtics - Pierce and Garnett are winding down their careers but owed huge sums. Pierce is only guaranteed 5mil and Boston still owned its amnesty. They have some young talent and now may be the time to ditch the vets.

Clippers - Paul wants to win in the playoffs and reportedly gets in arguments with the young players on his team.

Husoton - they are in a different position in that they outperformed expectations. But they have a ton of youth and must be thinking they are just a couple moves away from contending. Do they go after Howard even though Asik has shown he isa quality center? Perhaps they go after Paul instead?

Denver - They have a lot of B level talent, but need to get an A level talent. They have to be confused on what to do with their bigs.

Atlanta - josh smith out most likely. How do they use their assets

Bucks - most of their team is at the end of their contracts.




Thoughts in general, and thoughts related to Blazers both welcome.

Lakers - Howard (Does he want to give up nearly $30 million?)
I think he's staying.

Houston - Asik (he's a double-double machine providing decent to good D at the 5), Paul (they might go after him or another pg), Thomas Robinson (interested in seeing how he'll do next season)

Denver - McGee (they didn't play him much during the regular season and may trade him when it's possible), Iggy (depends on his player option, will he opt in?)

Atlanta - Josh Smith (going to the highest bidder)

Bucks - Keeping their young talent and jettison the vets
 
Somehow I bet Paul ends up on the lakers.
 
Somehow I bet Paul ends up on the lakers.

I just don't see how that could happen. Assuming Paul wants to go there it will be because Howard decides to stay. I can't see a way for pal to get on the lakers unless he was willing to earn a tiny portion of what he is worth.
 
I just don't see how that could happen. Assuming Paul wants to go there it will be because Howard decides to stay. I can't see a way for pal to get on the lakers unless he was willing to earn a tiny portion of what he is worth.

It's the Lakers, if there is someway they can continue to stay in the upper echelon of NBA teams, they'll find the way.
 
I just don't see how that could happen. Assuming Paul wants to go there it will be because Howard decides to stay. I can't see a way for pal to get on the lakers unless he was willing to earn a tiny portion of what he is worth.


Trade Paul for Kobe!

Not gonna happen, but if it did, I would laugh till I soiled my bloomers! Kobe and Sterling would both get what they deserve.
 
Houston should go twin towers with Asik and Howard.
 
Can someone remove the "free" in the title? I switched from free agency to the offseason and ended up with a dopey mix of the two.
 
Lakers - Howard (Does he want to give up nearly $30 million?)
I think he's staying.

Apparently, because of less taxes in Houston, it's about the same amount of money. I think he'll go to Houston. It is the perfect team for him. Lots of three point shooters and a young star who can distribute as well as score on his own. The Lakers will be horrible next year whether or not he stays. He knows this. I guess I should hope he doesn't go to Houston because that would make it hard for us to contend in the West.
 
Apparently, because of less taxes in Houston, it's about the same amount of money.

I wonder if players factor in the likelihood of getting moved for salary relief late in their contracts? Tax savings don't follow the contract if they're traded out of state...
 
I wonder if players factor in the likelihood of getting moved for salary relief late in their contracts? Tax savings don't follow the contract if they're traded out of state...

And how much tax savings are you guys talking about?
 
Lakers - Pau Gasol, but only if they amnesty him
Celtics - Kevin Garnett - why not? He's still an elite interior defender and every teammate loves him
Clippers - ERIC BLEDSOE
Houston - OMER AŞIK
Denver - Dre, Koufos, Mozgov
Atlanta - Horford (they'd have to want to blow the whole thing up)
Bucks - Dunleavey (strangely good stats), Udoh (I'd say Sanders, but we ain't getting him)
 
Now BKN nets out, so add them to the list.

They are kind of screwed in the salary world, not sure what moves they would be looking at. I would love Lopez, but I see no chance of him being traded.
 
Now BKN nets out, so add them to the list.

They are kind of screwed in the salary world, not sure what moves they would be looking at. I would love Lopez, but I see no chance of him being traded.

The only person they seem willing to trade Lopez for is Howard.

I like the young guy MarShan Brooks but I wouldn't give up much for him.
 
Now BKN nets out, so add them to the list.

They are kind of screwed in the salary world, not sure what moves they would be looking at. I would love Lopez, but I see no chance of him being traded.

Lopez is good, but he is not worth anything close to 16 million.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top