<div class="quote_poster">Quoting TheBlackMamba:</div><div class="quote_post">Because it's not an acceptable way of life. Everybody is raised to believe that a family consists of a father, a mother, and a child. That's a family...not two fathers and an adopted child nor two mothers and an adopted child. It's just not right, it doesn't fit in society. If gay marriage is legalized, ever...you'll see a huge spike in gay hate crimes. You'll see a huge spike in playground fights, even. You'll see a huge spike in assualts and batteries. You'll see a huge spike in vandalism. It's not acceptable through most of society, it just won't work without bloodshed.</div>
So single-parent families shouldn't be considered acceptable? Obviously, that's not what you meant, but you're making it an awfully strict definition.
Well, you're arguing against gay adoption, not marriage. There's no guarantee that a married gay couple will eventually want children. That said, I still don't see why a gay couple should be denied the right to raise children if they have shown to be just as capable in parenting. I mean, how could you force a child to grow up in an orphanage without a family, while a loving gay couple is ready to take them in, just to protect what is "right?" What is right anyway? Homosexuality doesn't hurt others and gays are still productive members of society. And since when have we outlawed things, because they don't fit in society? On one side people complain about how the voices of racial minorities and the poor are ignored, but then we want to supress a similarily mistreated minority in homosexuals.
Was integrating blacks into society after segregation worth the intense riots, hate, and violence it temporarily spawned? There's a reason you won't find homosexuals who are afraid to seek their equal rights from fear of hate and violence: they are tired of being treated as half-citizens simply because they live a lifestyle that offends people.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting 44Thrilla:</div><div class="quote_post">The problem I have is that there is nothing wrong with the marraige system that has been in place for hundreds of years. You can't begin to start changing things based upon the beliefs of a certain group of people, especially when the beliefs are based on sexual preference. I look at homosexuality in the same light as beastiality and pedophilia, as in it's a sexual perversion that is obviously not intended since there's no chance of procreation. The only difference being that most of our modern society has chosen to accept homosexuality as an acceptable sexual lifestyle. </div>
Unfortunately, procreation is no longer the sole purpose of sexual relations and marriage in modern society. Straight couples enjoy the ability to have sex without reproducing and may live their lives married without raising children. Therefore, I don't see why we should hold homosexuals up to this standard when society as a whole now lives under an evolved, more accepting concept of marriage.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting 44Thrilla:</div><div class="quote_post">We will never see eye to eye on this because we have different beliefs. You are relating it to race, but I would never be able to do that since I feel as though being gay is a choice, and your race is not. If somebody could prove to me with 100% certainty that people were born gay, then I'd agree with you. But I can't get myself to believe that the human brain is capable of instinctly attracting itself to a member of the same sex. And until it can be proven, I think that homosexuality should be treated in the same way that other bizarre sexual activities are treated.</div>
Suprisingly enough, I'm not totally convinced that homosexuality is born. And believe me, I was hesitant to equate the issue to racism. But the fact is that I've never met a homosexual that has been able to control their feelings and return to being straight. And some of them have wanted nothing else other than to be "normal," to avoid the prejudice and shame they are forced to live with. It may not be the same as race, but the reactions against it are startlingly similar. I suppose I'd take the opposite position of your's, in that until we find out that homosexuality is a condition that is abnormal and can be reversed/healed, I can't justify treating gays as a defection in society that should be treated differently than any of us.