magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
I don't care about why you voted, just vote. I want to see what the forum's opinion is on blake's minutes played.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spamming? Pshaw.
We need every thread to be about "BLANKY". In fact, maybe Denny Crane could set up an all-BLANKY, all the time forum.
I just can't get enough of reading repetitive opinions on how bad Charles Manson, er BLANKY, is.
Spamming? Pshaw.
We need every thread to be about "BLANKY". In fact, maybe Denny Crane could set up an all-BLANKY, all the time forum.
I just can't get enough of reading repetitive opinions on how bad Charles Manson, er BLANKY, is.

We brought Andre Miller here for a reason - to upgreade the starting PG spot. Miller is clearly out producing Blake (PER = 14.3 vs. 9.5), but playing fewer minutes. It makes no sense to me.
We need to ditch the 3 guard line-up, cut back on the isolation plays that grind the game to a halt (teams are simply doubling Roy out high were he can neither score, nor pass to an open teammate under the basket). Blake should be getting 10 - 15 MPG as our back-up PG - the role (and PT) Sergio had last season. The time for experimenting is over. That's what preseason is for. We're now 14 games into the regular season. Time to put our best players on the floor and let them learn how to play together.
BNM

If Miller has been an upgrade thus far, I'd hate to see what a downgrade would look like. At this point, the Miller signing seems to be a complete dud, at least in terms of upgrading what BLANKY did last year as the starting PG.![]()
Which is why a "true PG" cannot co-exist with Roy. Sad but true.
Which is why a "true PG" cannot co-exist with Roy. Sad but true.
