It seems clear that moving forward this summer with Powell as our 2 while trading CJ for a comparably-talented starting forward is the way to go. (Full disclosure, this was also what Chad Doing was harping on incessantly during last night's post game show as well) But while it's easy to say in theory, the real dilemma is, what forward(s) out there would be:
- An upgrade over what we presently have
- Similar enough in value to CJ to warrant a deal
- Presently on a team that would value CJ as an addition (replacement)
- On a contract that would make the trade possible
I'm just curious who out there might fit all those criteria, or is this all a futile notion?
Given #3, I'm assuming any deal with CJ going out would likely have to be a 3 team deal. It seems unlikely that there'd be an even swap where the other team happens to have a glut of forwards over guards.
I don't know if we're finding similar value in CJ, or if it would have to be a $1 for 4 quarters, or two 50 cent pieces type of trade.
Kind of going team by team
Philly: Can see interest as another ball handler alongside Simmons and Embiid. Maybe one of two teams where a direct swap is possible. Would need them to flame out in the playoffs. CJ+ for Simmons would be awesome. Tobias has been discussed a bunch here, but don't see it pushing us forward much, more shuffling pieces around.
Brooklyn: No need
Milwaukee: Again, with a playoff flameout, maybe a CJ for Middleton swap.
Atlanta: Don't see it.
Boston: No
Knicks: I think they could use CJ, and could see them targeting him. They have cap space, they have youngish players. They're a team I could see attempting it, but with a 3rd team. They're not going to swap Randle for CJ, they would want to pair the 2. So they send young pieces to team X. X sends us Y, we send CJ. Gets us back to, who is Team Y?
Miami: Can see them having interest as well, pairing with Butler. Don't have pieces we would want or need.
Charlotte: Unlikely. Graham and Rozier duplicate some of what he offers.
Indiana: I think he'd be a great pairing there with Brogdon and Lavert. Would give them the scoring punch I think they were hoping to get with Oladipo.
Toronto: no, though I'd love Siakam as our #2, a swap there seems unlikely.
Chicago: Don't know if a Lavine/CJ pairing is going to work.
Washington: Westbrook/Beal. No.
Cleveland: No
Orlando: Not anymore
Detroit: Maybe they'd look to accelerate their rebuild, but like NY, they'd want to pair CJ with Grant, not swap the 2.
Utah: Backcourt set
Phoenix: Same
Clippers: Guess we'd have to ask Kawhi how he feels about a CJ-George swap.
Denver: Seems unlikely
Lakers: Nothing we want, and lack the assets to make it a 3 team, IMO.
Dallas: Do we want to try KP at PF?
Memphis: Another team I could see pushing forward their timeline with a good vet. I just don't see a deal that makes sense with us. Again, maybe there's a 3rd team?
GS: Don't see it
SA: Odd fit to their timeline, but I also don't know what their timeline is.
N.O.: Can see the fit. Ingram-CJ swap feels off for them, but also, Ingram not known for his defense. So we swap one poor defender for another? I suppose with bench additions, it ultimately makes our lineup better, if we swap Powell for CJ, and then Ingram for DJJ.
Sacramento: Backcourt likely set with Fox and Halliburton
OKC: SGA and Dort are there. Doesn't seem like Presti is going to try to push their timeline up with a CJ type addition.
Minnesota: Who knows what that disaster of a franchise will do. But, with Russell and Edwards in the backcourt, and the possibility of adding Cunningham or Suggs in the draft, as well as having 12 guards on the roster, doubtful.
Houston: Don't see it.