- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 127,017
- Likes
- 147,624
- Points
- 115
HEAD COACH TERRY STOTTS
On using three-guard lineup tonight:
“The obvious thing was Shabazz was playing really well and I didn’t want to take him out. They had a lineup where defensively we could kind of match up and they didn’t have a big three-man or a big guard that we couldn’t match up with. But Shabazz had a great night and I needed to keep him on the floor.”
Would you have stayed with it if Simmons had stayed in?
“I would have certainly looked at it. I mean, CJ, we were prepared to have CJ on him. But Simmons, he was tough. I would have certainly kept with it to see if it didn’t work or not.”
What would it mean if Napier continues to play like this?
“Well, I’ll tell you what, if he goes 5 for 5 from threes every night, that’s a good thing for us. I’ll go out on a limb and say that’s really good.”
“He gives us a spark. On a night where Evan kind of struggled a little bit and Pat missed his shots, it was a big spark. Being able to kind of rest Dame and CJ and see how that goes, I think sometimes it might be tough with lineups, but he’s playing really well.”
On Napier’s defense as well:
“He’s good at anticipating. He had a matchup where he could kind of roam a little bit and in the last couple games, he’s got some steals and deflections. He can create some turnovers for us.”
On three point shooting success tonight:
“It was good to see Dame make them obviously. CJ’s threes – that last one with the ball rolling around, it was ridiculous – I mean, a leaner at the shot clock buzzer. We made some tough threes, but I thought we moved the ball well to the weak side to have some open threes as well.”
On using three-guard lineup tonight:
“The obvious thing was Shabazz was playing really well and I didn’t want to take him out. They had a lineup where defensively we could kind of match up and they didn’t have a big three-man or a big guard that we couldn’t match up with. But Shabazz had a great night and I needed to keep him on the floor.”
Would you have stayed with it if Simmons had stayed in?
“I would have certainly looked at it. I mean, CJ, we were prepared to have CJ on him. But Simmons, he was tough. I would have certainly kept with it to see if it didn’t work or not.”
What would it mean if Napier continues to play like this?
“Well, I’ll tell you what, if he goes 5 for 5 from threes every night, that’s a good thing for us. I’ll go out on a limb and say that’s really good.”
“He gives us a spark. On a night where Evan kind of struggled a little bit and Pat missed his shots, it was a big spark. Being able to kind of rest Dame and CJ and see how that goes, I think sometimes it might be tough with lineups, but he’s playing really well.”
On Napier’s defense as well:
“He’s good at anticipating. He had a matchup where he could kind of roam a little bit and in the last couple games, he’s got some steals and deflections. He can create some turnovers for us.”
On three point shooting success tonight:
“It was good to see Dame make them obviously. CJ’s threes – that last one with the ball rolling around, it was ridiculous – I mean, a leaner at the shot clock buzzer. We made some tough threes, but I thought we moved the ball well to the weak side to have some open threes as well.”
