I think it is both. You should take advantage of all tools available to you. The best teams and managers/coaches use analytics as part of their process and assessment and game planning, but also don't act like robots and say analytics says this so I have to do it no matter what. It is a balance IMO, and I think it would be faulty to totally rely on analytics only, and just as faulty to eliminate them and pretend they don't exist.
Game 2 Canes vs. Rangers
- Thread starter kreidertime
- Start date
Welcome to our community
Be a part of something great, join today!
The Canes and the Pacers share something in common besides trailing the NYC teams 2-0 in their series, they are both whiny bit*hes complaining about refs, and diving, and calls (coaches included). Both teams need to get some balls and stop crying. I expect both teams to play very well going back home, game 3 will be extremely difficult for either NYC team to win, and neither series is close to over despite the 2-0 leads for the NYC teams, but go play with dignity Canes/Pacers, not pathetic whining.
kreidertime
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2014
- Messages
- 10,363
- Likes
- 565
- Points
- 113
Actually the A's won a lot using analytics. They just never won a title. They used it because they had no money. If they could have signed all their stars to big contracts, they wouldn't have used analytics. Something dumbass Cashman can't grasp.
BigDaddyAl1973
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 7,058
- Likes
- 1,469
- Points
- 113
If Giambi slides the Yanks may have been swept