GAME 2 - RANGERS-KINGS

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
I get the sense the Kings are tired but the Rangers cannot make them pay. Even when they try they shoot wide anyway.
 
I think both teams are tired. We need to be careful with the long change.
 
Just another horrific playoff loss to add to the Rangers history.
 
Shame. We really should have won this game. Actually ended the way it should have. Sloppy with the puck in our own end, Kings get point shot, and goal.

Really a shame because if we won this game I really think we would have had an excellent shot to win this series. Now quite frankly I don't think we have any shot to win it.

What can you do I guess. Is what it is.
 
UGH. Just an awful loss. Awful. We blew so many chances these first 2gms in LA and numerous leads.
 
That sucked girardi on ice for all goals and richards should just skate off the ice turn in his jersey and go home. 2 OT losses. unbelievable.
 
chuckd3534 said:
Shame. We really should have won this game. Actually ended the way it should have. Sloppy with the puck in our own end, Kings get point shot, and goal.

Really a shame because if we won this game I really think we would have had an excellent shot to win this series. Now quite frankly I don't think we have any shot to win it.

What can you do I guess. Is what it is.
Click to expand...

We haven't even played a single home game, so we're not really down until we lose a home game. But Gm 3 is an obvious, absolute must-win.
 
Trade Nash, buy out Richards. Sign Statsny, bring up young player to fill Nash's spot (which is totally possible because Nash is as soft as fucking Charmin and is a fucking waste) and then get back at it next year boys.
 
They got what they deserved.

But this is why I didn't want the Kings. They know how to win these games


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I am not really even that upset. When you blow FOUR 2 goals leads in two games and lose both, what can you say. If we knew how to be strong on the puck and clear the zone we are 1-1 for sure. And Kreider missing on 4 great chances in OT doesn't help either.

I think I am most upset because I would have loved to see the Garden rocking Monday night tied at 1-1 in a tossup series.
 
NYR31 said:
We haven't even played a single home game, so we're not really down until we lose a home game. But Gm 3 is an obvious, absolute must-win.
Click to expand...

3 and 4 are must wins

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
This is also what the Kings do.

I am not giving up yet but you can't lose 2 games like that and win a series


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Tired of hearing about how many shots on goal Nash had in the third period or about the power move he made. He's a useless fuck who as usual is doing nothing scoring wise.
 
Disturbed said:
This is also what the Kings do.

I am not giving up yet but you can't lose 2 games like that and win a series


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Agreed, Dis. What sux is the way we lost them, but the Kings held home ice and now we have to do the same to get back in the series.
 
this team needs to experience a Stanley Cup defeat before they can taste Victory. Im seriously wondering if signing Girardi was a bad idea, he looks slow mixed with just unintelligent hockey plays. he should be bumped down to the second or third D pair next game. Onto Game 3 hopefully a win, but i just dont see this group doing what it needs against the Kings.
 
31, just giving you my opinion. Not about giving up or not giving up or ripping anybody or not ripping anybody. I personally do not see us winning 4 of 5 games against the Kings. They are better on the road and we are better on the road. In addition, when a team goes down 2-0 in the NHL the %'s are WAY stacked against you winning the series.

I am not even being a Ranger fan when I offer my opinion. This isn't an oh someone bailing on the team. I am offering my opinion as a hockey fan, and as a hockey fan I do not see the Rangers beating the Kings 4 of 5, double so after blowing FOUR 2 goal leads in two games.
 
I imagine we will split at MSG and need to win 3 in a row but let's see what happens.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
SaveLundy said:
this team needs to experience a Stanley Cup defeat before they can taste Victory. Im seriously wondering if signing Girardi was a bad idea, he looks slow mixed with just unintelligent hockey plays. he should be bumped down to the second or third D pair next game. Onto Game 3 hopefully a win, but i just dont see this group doing what it needs against the Kings.
Click to expand...

There's no one on the lower pairs I would want moved up. Staal MAYBE, but even he's looked so-so out there.
 
That's fine, Chuck. No issues, just telling you my own opinion as well. I don't pay too much attention to stats b/c here are the Kings 2gms away from a SC after winning 3gm 7's on the road. How many teams have done that?

That's my point.
 
I am not emotional at all. We get what we deserve when we allow 8 goals in two games and 6 are off TO's in our zone.

Now 1000000000000000000% give the Kings credit for forcing TO's, but not 6 that lead to goals in two games. 2 or 3...okay, but 6 is sloppy. And some were just unforced lazy plays. Stepan, Richards, Girardi, McDonagh.

Again, is what it is. To me it is a real shame is all. This should be a 1-1 series. No doubt.
 
Win Gm 3 and it's on. Lose it and it's over.
 
Hopefully the crowd can give them a boost to get through game 3 and make it interesting. They need to have a short memory.
 
I respect that 31. Anything can happen. We'll watch and we'll all root. And hey maybe we can do it. I just think at best it is a VERY long shot it happens now. What can you do.

We had plenty of chances in these two games. We squandered them all. We get what we deserve.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top