Game Thread GAME# 21: BLAZERS @ 76ERS - FEBRUARY 4, 2021 - THURSDAY, 5:00, NBCSNW

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Have you ever redeemed the free Blazers' 100-Point-Play McNuggets?

  • Total voters
    48
  • Poll closed .
kjironman1 said:
That seems to be the joke but honestly speaking he is 4 inches taller and his arms are 3 inches longer on each side. 6 inches more length. Look where his shoulder is compared to Lillard.
Click to expand...

Elleby is a legit small forward in today’s game, just from a physical standpoint. He’s bigger than Trent too, who’s not a small guy.
 
Scalma said:
Elleby is a legit small forward in today’s game, just from a physical standpoint. He’s bigger than Trent too, who’s not a small guy.
Click to expand...
he looked close to thybulle's size. surprised.

it's funny, CJ2 said in postgame he really enjoyed playing Matisse cuz of their Washington connection in HS and college
 
Last edited:
I'm really not worried about Blevins. Literally the 14th man on the roster. He sees time when there is no question in the game. Could it be someone better? Probably. Does it need to be? I sure hope not because if it does the Blazers are in a terrible position meaning it really wouldn't make any difference anyway and probably would be just as well having it be Blevins on the court.
 
kjironman1 said:
I'm really not worried about Blevins. Literally the 14th man on the roster. He sees time when there is no question in the game. Could it be someone better? Probably. Does it need to be? I sure hope not because if it does the Blazers are in a terrible position meaning it really wouldn't make any difference anyway and probably would be just as well having it be Blevins on the court.
Click to expand...

That was a nepotism signing for dame. If it makes him happy then that’s the small price u pay for a 15th man on the bench
 
kjironman1 said:
I'm really not worried about Blevins. Literally the 14th man on the roster. He sees time when there is no question in the game. Could it be someone better? Probably. Does it need to be? I sure hope not because if it does the Blazers are in a terrible position meaning it really wouldn't make any difference anyway and probably would be just as well having it be Blevins on the court.
Click to expand...

two way spots should be used on players that at least have the potential to be developed into rotation players. We’ve never really developed anyone because Olshey doesn’t really invest anything into it. But then he goes and drops 30m on two products of the g league. Funny shit.
 
kjironman1 said:
I'm really not worried about Blevins. Literally the 14th man on the roster. He sees time when there is no question in the game. Could it be someone better? Probably. Does it need to be? I sure hope not because if it does the Blazers are in a terrible position meaning it really wouldn't make any difference anyway and probably would be just as well having it be Blevins on the court.
Click to expand...
Right now the 14th man on our roster could be starting.
 
Scalma said:
two way spots should be used on players that at least have the potential to be developed into rotation players. We’ve never really developed anyone because Olshey doesn’t really invest anything into it. But then he goes and drops 30m on two products of the g league. Funny shit.
Click to expand...
True.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Right now the 14th man on our roster could be starting.
Click to expand...
Then he wouldn't be the 14th man right? I'll concede Olshey could and probably should make better use of the spot i just am not really worried about it for reasons i explained.
 
THE HCP said:
So can the hoop experts please tell me if that was a well coached game by Stotts. I've read no props to him for this win. Only 17 assists tonight...... so who gets credit for this win?
Click to expand...
you must have me on ignore....I gave the coaches props throughout the game....maybe I used too big words and you skipped over them?
 
THE HCP said:
So can the hoop experts please tell me if that was a well coached game by Stotts. I've read no props to him for this win. Only 17 assists tonight...... so who gets credit for this win?
Click to expand...

Right on queue! I'm going to start an over/under thread on how long it takes you to post after a win.
 
THE HCP said:
So can the hoop experts please tell me if that was a well coached game by Stotts. I've read no props to him for this win. Only 17 assists tonight...... so who gets credit for this win?
Click to expand...

I have not given any credit to Stotts. If I say anything in favor of him, I will be called an apologist.
 
Last edited:
Why is Blevins even being mentioned in this thread? Who the fucks cares? Enjoy the win. There is still an open spot on the roster. Would another 2-way player have made a difference tonight? Any night?
 
And just like that we're in 5th place in the west a half game out of 4th behind the Nuggets.....we're 12/9
 
Pinwheel1 said:
Why is Blevins even being mentioned in this thread? Who the fucks cares? Enjoy the win. There is still an open spot on the roster. Would another 2-way player have made a difference tonight? Any night?
Click to expand...

This was probably the most positive group of posters in a game thread in a long while, win or loss.

I usually don't even open the game thread during a game because it's just so toxic.

Nobody really cares about Blevins.
 
Tince said:
Didn't you just get upset about calling out people who only post after losses? This would be along the same lines, no?
Click to expand...
Nope. This is the same thing. HCP only seems to get his rocks off by calling out other posters after wins.
 
THE HCP said:
I’m actually confused by this. What do you mean?
Click to expand...
Your first post after a solid win isn’t about how the team did great or that CJ did well. It was to call out other fans on this board. Which is consistently your stance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top