AldoTrapani
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2019
- Messages
- 9,529
- Likes
- 2,758
- Points
- 113
So you were both Aldo and Blazers 1977?
no
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you were both Aldo and Blazers 1977?
right now Portland is 3-4 against teams with less than 10 wins....that's bad
This sounds about a right as anything?So we're really bad against good teams, awful against the worst teams, but pretty darn good against the teams who are horrible at tanking?
We've been on Christmas break since October.NOLA came to play, we were already on our Christmas break.
That’s why we should trade CJ for him so he won’t have to play against him anymore.Dame definitely doesn't play well against him, that is for sure.
Great statWe are the sixth best three point shooting team in the NBA @ 36.6%.
If we'd even shot 24.2% (so three more threes) let alone our season average, we'd have won.
We were missing wide open threes, so I wouldn't read too much into this result on the offensive end.
Defensively however, we were bad tonight, especially in the second half.
NOLA was 6/18 (33.3%) from deep in the first half, and 9/17 (52.9%) in the second, to finish with 15/35 (42.9%).
Our season opposition 3P% is 35.2%, which is good for 13 best in the NBA.
NOLA came to play, we were already on our Christmas break.
In past years, we would be laughing at some team from the East for being in the Playoffs with a sub .500 record...
Well the NBA in a lot of ways has turned into a 3 point contest. Blazers for whatever reason just couldnt get shots to fall.You live or die by the 3 and we die last night.
A steaming pile of horseshit might be more appropriate.
Nate Mc Millan's team had 34 assists last night in their victory over Toronto, while Blazers had 17. BTW, aren't KP and Nate doing a pretty damn good job! Without their best player?Please fire Stotts. Look at what a team of mostly scrubs can do with ball movement
We are the sixth best three point shooting team in the NBA @ 36.6%.
If we'd even shot 24.2% (so three more threes) let alone our season average, we'd have won.
usually that's not how it works though. It's more like a game of bop-a-mole when a team is struggling like Portland is. They shoot better on three's but they double their turnovers or clank their FT's. They rebound better but double their fouls.
Portland is a perimeter oriented team; their average shot distance ranks 23rd, and perimeter shooting is not the most dependable offensive weapon. It may be one of the least dependable, and when Dame and CJ combine for 2-20 on three's, Portland will lose a lot of games
by the way, after last night Portland isn't 6th in the NBA in 3pt shooting, they are 14th. One bad night
That why i wrote that opinion and you figure if not hitting the 3 you would other ways to score. Coaches and players have to be smarter if your shot is not going in you might have attack the basket or just better ball and player movement. But we to much iso or PNR with at least 3 player just standing there and watching.Well the NBA in a lot of ways has turned into a 3 point contest. Blazers for whatever reason just couldnt get shots to fall.
For me, in order to use the "shots didn't fall" reasoning for losing I have to feel like the team left it all on the floor elsewhere. In this game the Blazers mostly played like they could just show up and win because they had won 4 in a row.
Yeah...our defense wasn't the reason we lost Tuesday.Pelicans looked good in Denver. We actually played better D on them than Denver did.
Pelicans played well again. That team is coming around nicely.Pelicans looked good in Denver. We actually played better D on them than Denver did.
