Nah, Vonleh just had "no talent" just like Layman.
Yes they’ve gotten the ball go to Nurk several times. Nothing good has come of it though.
You don't get it. Layman and Vonleh suck and are only playing decent because they got to be coached by Stotts.
There’s something to be said for consistency. That’s a good reason.
Just wait, after the game they'll say some generic ass stuff like "This player struggled, they played well, it's definitely not on Stotts" or we'll get a 10-0 run with Dame and CJ hitting insanely tough shots and Kingspeed will say "10-0 run, great job Stotts!!!" or "People are just complaining because we lost", etc.
Hahahahahahaha
Or something like this as a reason for not playing Layman or Vonleh more.
Well he did miss one shot in his past two games so obviously he doesn't deserve more minutes.
A consistent rotation.
BS. He's had very few touches and the touches he has gotten aren't with good position in the low post that could possibly set up by having sets designed to get him the ball with good position in the low post.
Oh, you mean the guy who's 1-5 with 2 pts, 0 asts, 0rebs, and a turnover in 9 minutes?
It's so strange man... So many fanbases wouldn't give Stotts a pass for that crap, and we're supposedly one of the "smarter fan bases"... It was beyond obvious that he coached an absolutely terrible series.
The generic and generalized argumentative tactics they use to try to paint very knowledgeable posters than fairly and objectively criticize Stotts based on real basketball reasons is what really annoys me man. Which is why I'm trying to prove a point tonight by pointing out every single issue I see with Stotts coaching. Because honestly, I hold back more than people think.
