And BTW mel, do me a favor and tell me the lotto numbers tomorrow night please. You said:
The problem is if play called correctly is we win in regulation and there is no ot
How the do you know that man? Gabby scored to tie it. So let's say that goal makes it 4-3, how do you know they still don't tie it? How do you know they don't pull Quick and tie it?
Again, respect the opinions on this, but it is a copout and much easier than saying we didn't get it done. That's my view.
Chuck your still missing the point. Whether the rangers scored a goal in that 3rd period is irrevalent. Why did the rangers have to? they had a 2 goal lead and all the momentum and were playing well and with confidence. Maybe the kings start pinching their d all over the place resulting in odd man rushes we can cash in on. As for numbe of kings penalties who cares. They were most penalized team in the playoffs and I think coming into the finals they had twice as many penalties as their opponents. As for not being a penalty you'd be in the minority as even a ranger hater like milbury said it was a penalty. And they called a penalty on pouliot the period before for incidental contact with quick way out of the crease where he doesn't belong. That choking non-call turned the whole series. Who knows what happens if that call made correctly but up until that time I think the rangers were undefeated in the playoffs coming into the third period with a lead. No question kings are good team but they had some guardian angels helping them with striped shirts.