Pinwheel1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 23,420
- Likes
- 15,989
- Points
- 113
Really?? That lil tweak? That was nothing.
You wouldn't know it by the way he reacted to it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really?? That lil tweak? That was nothing.
I honestly hope you are right. The way he responded to it was pretty fierce. Glad he got back in the game and i hope he continues to play well. They are worthy of the playoffs this year.Really?? That lil tweak? That was nothing.
Oh no Harkless, hope this is not the Wes Matthews injury when we are playing well and shit happens
The homers on this forum are becoming unbearable man.

It's always been unbearableSheesh? I'm getting fucking blasted for pointing out how Turner played defense to start the 2nd half. Even said he played solid D down the stretch, but apparently that's not enough for y'all. It's ridiculous.
If you think I never enjoy a win, then you don't pay enough attention to my posts. Holy hell. Everybody's saying Turner played phenomenal D, which is false. He had a horrible stretch in the 3rd where he gave up 10 points in about 3-4 minutes. Is it really so wrong to not falsely claim he had a full great game of defense? That doesn't mean I'm not enjoying it dude. It's okay to point out where someone struggled. That doesn't mean I'm not enjoying it and it's pathetic to blast me for that.Do you ever enjoy a win? I know it was ugly. But the Blazers needed it. Why pick your favorite whipping post to beat on for a few bad minutes when there are so many players that could have done more?
End point is the team won the game on a herculean effort by Dame and some great defense by all the starters. Try to enjoy it once is all they are saying.
He almost cost us the game there. He made it up at the end with his shooting and solid defense, but it's false to say he had a "great game of tremendous defense". That's all I'm saying.. you can agree or disagree, but to blast me for pointing out where someone struggled and falsely claim I "didn't enjoy this win" is pathetic.Really? Your post about Turner's 4 min stretch of bad D didn't have that much of an effect on the game and to bring it up is nitpicky.
Most really wants to hear that after a tough gritty win. And no, you're not being objective. No, you're not pointing out something that we can improve upon.
You're nitpicking... Jussayin'...
Whatever....If you think I never enjoy a win, then you don't pay enough attention to my posts. Holy hell. Everybody's saying Turner played phenomenal D, which is false. He had a horrible stretch in the 3rd where he gave up 10 points in about 3-4 minutes. Is it really so wrong to not falsely claim he had a full great game of defense? That doesn't mean I'm not enjoying it dude. It's okay to point out where someone struggled. That doesn't mean I'm not enjoying it and it's pathetic to blast me for that.
That's exactly what I'm saying, and they're not OK with that, so watch out.Turner was very inconsistent tonight.
Looks like once his back loosed up in the 3rd. He was able to keep people in front of him.
But for a stretch there, Pat or Napier looked like they should've replaced him
It's not a knock on the win to say that either.
Have a nice evening.Whatever....
When did he roll it?He was pretty hobbled after going down on it. You could tell he was not jumping or posting up the way he usually does. Muy thinking is he will be hurting tomorrow and will be questionable for their next game.
3rd quarterWhen did he roll it?
@HCP and @Mediocre Man I think you got a third musketeer!The homers on this forum are becoming unbearable man.
my god, when CJ is off he definitely doesnt stay away from the buffet does he.
3-19? jeebus
It's like seeing a glimpse via ghosts of ChristmasSays the dude who insulted me first, got rid of the insult after I responded, then tried to claim I insulted you first.. pathetic.
I didn't get rid of any insult.Says the dude who insulted me first, got rid of the insult after I responded, then tried to claim I insulted you first.. pathetic.
Lol he’s got some things to work on this summer. There’s no reason a guy as smart as him shouldn’t be a better playmaker for others. When his shot is off he makes no impact on the game. Can’t have that.
Uh-oh. Mo out. Evans bad back. Nurk sore back. Bazz sore "great" toe. Dame exhausted. Could be the CJ show.
Let's just say I'm not putting any money down on winning this game.
Guys, I don't normally share “inside” info, BUT........
yeah he definitely needs to fall back into moving the ball, cutting, making the extra pass when he's this off. all the things people do to feed him when he's hitting from the other side of the universe.
i just read the last couple of pages here. the more things change, the more things stay the same.
lets be happy for the bros, we needed a shit n grit win, im happy to take another tick in the W column
also, shout out to my homeboy meyers leonard.
finally a stat line that reflects his actual skills.
![]()
Neither Layman nor Baldwin will play unless it's a blowout, or Turner's back acts up. The bench minutes will be split between Bazz, Pat, Turner, Zach and Ed. No need to go more than 10 deep (that's what she said!), unless someone is in foul trouble.
BNM
+2 without playingWhat skills? Warming the bench?
It’s crazy to see the contrast between dame and CJ on pick and rolls with Nurk. CJ doesn’t even read screens properly, or just flat out ignores them which fucks up the spacing. Won’t even get into the passing part. But these are all fixable problems as long as he’s willing.
Am I the only one that thinks posting stuff like this is every bit the definition of a chicken shit post?Good for you, river man. I'm about to ignore the guy too.
That's it... you're on IGNORE!The homers on this forum are becoming unbearable man.
