Game thread: Blazers vs. Mavericks

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
that looked a lot like a travel to me.

Joel doesn't alleyoop like Oden can.
 
Nice score by Bayless, then a horrible pass by Bayless for a Dallas bucket.
 
Last edited:
See? You go toward the basket, and good things happen.
 
We've done some nice things on offense this quarter but we can't frickin stop them!
 
10 point game. This is ours. Play Bayless the rest of the way.
 
Down to 10. Honestly, I'll take it.
 
10 pt game, SO CLOSE to getting back in, but we need to play lights out just to make a comeback, Dallas is hot
 
Gotta move Travis outta the three; keep Roy there, with Rudy and Bayless in...that was working.
 
Bayless has been playing 9 minutes straight. This is where Nate needs to earn his paycheck. You have to be smart when you give him his blow.
 
MARIS61 said:
Should have left Sergio in, this is sad.
Click to expand...

What's funny is that you clearly aren't a dumb person, based on your history on BBF and here, so what's with the troll-like tendencies when it comes to Sergio vs Bayless? It's really strange....
 
I like it when Travis drives. Have I said that before?
 
One thing I've noticed about Bayless is that he's trying to pass more. Even if his pass turns in to a turnover, he's TRYING to be a NBA point guard. He's a ROOKIE, a TRUE ROOKIE, and his upside is ridiculous. No doubt in my mind, whatsoever, that Bayless has earned the backup PG duty when Blake comes back. It's too obvious.
 
Block in the back. 10 yards from the spot of the foul.
 
The Professional Fan said:
One thing I've noticed about Bayless is that he's trying to pass more. Even if his pass turns in to a turnover, he's TRYING to be a NBA point guard. He's a ROOKIE, a TRUE ROOKIE, and his upside is ridiculous. No doubt in my mind, whatsoever, that Bayless has earned the backup PG duty when Blake comes back. It's too obvious.
Click to expand...

+1, completely agree, repped
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top