Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,187
- Likes
- 57,407
- Points
- 113
Does the fact that the CJ deal is now CJ for Hart and Grant make it a better return?
Yes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does the fact that the CJ deal is now CJ for Hart and Grant make it a better return?
Does the fact that the CJ deal is now CJ for Hart and Grant make it a better return?
It does. I'd rather our brand new GM not have to salvage a disaster but he did it and deserves credit for it. I'll gladly eat crow.Does the fact that the CJ deal is now CJ for Hart and Grant make it a better return?
Does the fact that the CJ deal is now CJ for Hart and Grant make it a better return?
Does the fact that the CJ deal is now CJ for Hart and Grant make it a better return?
there were some people that held off on crucifying Cronin because of this very scenario. And yes, obviously it does.
Wait, we actually traded a 1st and 2 seconds + a pick swap.
We owned Detroit's 2025 second rounder. So we gave that back.
Basically the 1st we got in the McCollum deal + the 2nd we got in the Powell deal + the 2nd swap we got in the McCollum deal for Grant
Ehhh. I liked it better if we kept the Detroit 2nd, but it's fine I guess.
Does the fact that the CJ deal is now CJ for Hart and Grant make it a better return?
so now we traded CJ for Hart, Grant and Ingles?
I don't understand the Denver part..... how do they fit into this?
So now it looks like:
McCollum, Powell, Covington and Nance
For
Grant, Hart, Winslow, Johnson
It's ummm, okay I guess.