Greg Monroe available

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

What was the status of Rondo's bird rights?

This deal hinged upon Rondo agreeing to re-sign with Dallas.

Couldn't the same be done with Greg? Remember, his agent wanted him in Portland last summer and holds Neil in high regard after the Hibbert deal.

Cuban is more of a gambler than Paul is where Paul likes to play things more safe. Sometimes I do wish Paul was a little more like Cuban though.
 
Cuban is more of a gambler than Paul is where Paul likes to play things more safe. Sometimes I do wish Paul was a little more like Cuban though.

Well it helps that Dallas would still have Rondo's bird rights. Monroe, we wouldn't. But I suspect you already knew that... LOL
 
Nope. A deal sending Batum out only resulted in about $10M in cap space, and that's assuming we waive Kaman and renounce TRob. Sending out just CJ and Leonard would not do the trick.
Not talking about a MAX deal - we shouldn't be signing bench players to MAX deals. And I wasn't meaning for the idea to be compared to a Batum/Monroe deal (which is just a stupid idea). But since Robinson won't have a cap hold, and CJ/Leonard do, it seems like sending out two cap hold players would at least free up a LITTLE space to be able to offer either Monroe or Robinson a little more than we could currently offer them. And while it probably still wouldn't be enough to keep Monroe here past this season, perhaps it would be enough to at least keep Robinson? I guess what I'm getting at is I'm interested in what the difference would be between what we could offer either player if we don't make any trades versus what we could offer them if we were to clear CJ/Leonard's holds off the books in a Monroe deal.

I just feel like we should really try to have Monroe or Robinson as our back-up big. Giving up CJ/Leonard doesn't really impact our rotation at all, but would be a decent haul for DET who won't be getting much - if anything - in return for Monroe. And given the fact that we'd be giving DET two lotto picks, with team options, for one lotto pick without bird rights, perhaps we could even get a protected draft pick in the deal!
 
Not talking about a MAX deal - we shouldn't be signing bench players to MAX deals. And I wasn't meaning for the idea to be compared to a Batum/Monroe deal (which is just a stupid idea). But since Robinson won't have a cap hold, and CJ/Leonard do, it seems like sending out two cap hold players would at least free up a LITTLE space to be able to offer either Monroe or Robinson a little more than we could currently offer them. And while it probably still wouldn't be enough to keep Monroe here past this season, perhaps it would be enough to at least keep Robinson? I guess what I'm getting at is I'm interested in what the difference would be between what we could offer either player if we don't make any trades versus what we could offer them if we were to clear CJ/Leonard's holds off the books in a Monroe deal.

I just feel like we should really try to have Monroe or Robinson as our back-up big. Giving up CJ/Leonard doesn't really impact our rotation at all, but would be a decent haul for DET who won't be getting much - if anything - in return for Monroe. And given the fact that we'd be giving DET two lotto picks, with team options, for one lotto pick without bird rights, perhaps we could even get a protected draft pick in the deal!

Monroe will get more than $10 mil a season. Most likely 12-14 mil.
 
Oh I thought you already knew about Robinson. It doesn't matter how under cap we are, we can only offer him what his 4 year option is.

Aw shit. I did know that, but totally forgot. Thanks!
 
Aw shit. I did know that, but totally forgot. Thanks!

No worries bro. That's what's been really bothering me about not picking up his option. Any team with MLE can offer more than we can. :(
 
Well it helps that Dallas would still have Rondo's bird rights. Monroe, we wouldn't. But I suspect you already knew that... LOL

I'm not talking about just this one scenario but its true, Cuban is more of a risk taker where Paul sees to be more careful. Its not a bad thing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top