hasoos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 9,418
- Likes
- 97
- Points
- 48
I agree, the odds of winning after Bayless missed the first free trhrow was very low no matter what Bayless did with the second free throw.
I think it is a big issue because of the way Bayless handled it. It basically made this a Roy v. Miller issue . . . and to top it all off, Bayless choose to follow Miller's advise. I think it was a big mistake for Bayless to say all this.
You know I don't buy that. That is because I think like math, and order of operations. First Bayless was told to miss it. Then a few seconds later, another vet shows up and tells him to make it. How is he to know that the coach didn't change his mind and tell him to make it instead, and Miller was just passing the message? The last thing he was told to do is the final thing he would do in a normal situation. Order of operations. The whole fact that people are blowing this up into something like players doing something on purpose to spite the team makes me sick to say the least. There is no logical reason why a team member would ever do anything like that with malice.



