Politics HERE'S WHY TRUMP WILL SERVE 2 TERMS

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
I do believe Trump will see more black votes this time around.
My thinking is he has scored points on prison reform, jobs & believe it or not immigration reform and his position against democratic socialism.
As much as people dislike the guy (I won't vote for him) its my opinion a larger percentage (18%) of the Black community will leave the democratic party because, I think they will see that these socialistic big government ways isn't the answer. Now, this is just my opinion and I may be completely wrong? but we'll see. If the dem's annoit Bernie, game over.
 
Hoopguru said:
I do believe Trump will see more black votes this time around.
My thinking is he has scored points on prison reform, jobs & believe it or not immigration reform and his position against democratic socialism.
As much as people dislike the guy (I won't vote for him) its my opinion a larger percentage (18%) of the Black community will leave the democratic party because, I think they will see that these socialistic big government ways isn't the answer. Now, this is just my opinion and I may be completely wrong? but we'll see. If the dem's annoit Bernie, game over.
Click to expand...

You are right about at least one thing. Socialist big government is not the answer.
 
I really don’t want Trump to get another 4 years. We’ll see.
 
tlongII said:
I really don’t want Trump to get another 4 years. We’ll see.
Click to expand...
Uhhh if Harris and Warren fight over who can give out free shit and apparently reparations now too and then between them and Bernie one of them wins the nomination..........there is a good chance he wins.

He's getting my vote for sure...why?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.



id-like-to-return-this-jacket-certainly-may-l-ask-16112901.png
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Uhhh if Harris and Warren fight over who can give out free shit and apparently reparations now too and then between them and Bernie one of them wins the nomination..........there is a good chance he wins.

He's getting my vote for sure...why?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.



View attachment 24904
Click to expand...

He’s a dick. Don’t want some asshat being in control that long.
 
tlongII said:
He’s a dick. Don’t want some asshat being in control that long.
Click to expand...
I know but they're going to run a complete socialist. I'm not ready for one of those. About 10 more years please.

The spite is purely aimed at this forum. I am afraid for my millenial lesbian best work friend. I was telling her Trump was the best President ever last week and I thought she might have a stroke. I felt bad and stopped doing it.
 
Hoopguru said:
Fear "the scorn of a women"
Click to expand...
It's either fear the scorn of women or it's fear the scorn of a woman.
In any case, someone pointed out that the video was doctored. If it was legit' there would be a link from a credible source.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
I know but they're going to run a complete socialist. I'm not ready for one of those. About 10 more years please.

The spite is purely aimed at this forum. I am afraid for my millenial lesbian best work friend. I was telling her Trump was the best President ever last week and I thought she might have a stroke. I felt bad and stopped doing it.
Click to expand...
Tell me something. Is she still laughing?
 
Hoopguru said:
I do believe Trump will see more black votes this time around.
My thinking is he has scored points on prison reform, jobs & believe it or not immigration reform and his position against democratic socialism.
As much as people dislike the guy (I won't vote for him) its my opinion a larger percentage (18%) of the Black community will leave the democratic party because, I think they will see that these socialistic big government ways isn't the answer. Now, this is just my opinion and I may be completely wrong? but we'll see. If the dem's annoit Bernie, game over.
Click to expand...

Odds are against Sanders representing the democrats. If he wants to run, then run on his own party platform.
 
RNC’s McDaniel at CPAC: GOPers mulling Trump primary challenge will ‘lose horribly’

By Alex Pappas | Fox News
Ronna McDaniel says the 2020 Democratic field is 'weak'

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – Don’t expect the RNC to be neutral if President Trump faces a Republican primary challenger in 2020, party leader Ronna McDaniel indicated to conservative activists Thursday.

McDaniel, the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, was asked by an interviewer during an appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference about the possibility that a Republican, such as former Ohio Gov. John Kasich or Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, could challenge Trump.

“They have the right to jump in and lose,” McDaniel said. “That’s fine. They’ll lose horribly.”

McDaniel said Trump is enormously popular in the party. He is scheduled to appear at CPAC on Saturday.

“Our country is booming,” McDaniel told radio host Vince Coglianese. “Jobs are coming back. Wages are up. Our military has been strengthened. Our veterans have been taken care of. Our trade deals are stronger. We have put rule of law judges at every level of the courts, including the Supreme Court with Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.”

McDaniel added: “What would any Republican be thinking saying, ‘this a guy I’m going to run against?’”

Both Kasich and Hogan are anti-Trump Republicans who have not yet ruled out a primary run. Former Republican Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld recently announced an exploratory committee. None of these Republicans is scheduled to appear at the conference.

But McDaniel expressed confidence about Trump’s chances.

“So have at it. Go ahead. Waste your money, waste your time, and go ahead and lose,” she said.

The annual conference of hardcore conservatives began Wednesday at National Harbor, where the theme is “What Makes America Great” – a not-so-subtle play on Trump’s campaign slogan.

CPAC began its day with Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House Oversight Committee, and North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows, warning of the rise of socialism in the “radical” Democratic Party while saying they believe congressional Democrats are laying the foundation for Trump impeachment efforts.

The conference lasts until Saturday.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rn...ng-trump-primary-challenge-will-lose-horribly
 
MARIS61 said:
RNC’s McDaniel at CPAC: GOPers mulling Trump primary challenge will ‘lose horribly’

By Alex Pappas | Fox News
Ronna McDaniel says the 2020 Democratic field is 'weak'

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – Don’t expect the RNC to be neutral if President Trump faces a Republican primary challenger in 2020, party leader Ronna McDaniel indicated to conservative activists Thursday.

McDaniel, the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, was asked by an interviewer during an appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference about the possibility that a Republican, such as former Ohio Gov. John Kasich or Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, could challenge Trump.

“They have the right to jump in and lose,” McDaniel said. “That’s fine. They’ll lose horribly.”

McDaniel said Trump is enormously popular in the party. He is scheduled to appear at CPAC on Saturday.

“Our country is booming,” McDaniel told radio host Vince Coglianese. “Jobs are coming back. Wages are up. Our military has been strengthened. Our veterans have been taken care of. Our trade deals are stronger. We have put rule of law judges at every level of the courts, including the Supreme Court with Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.”

McDaniel added: “What would any Republican be thinking saying, ‘this a guy I’m going to run against?’”

Both Kasich and Hogan are anti-Trump Republicans who have not yet ruled out a primary run. Former Republican Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld recently announced an exploratory committee. None of these Republicans is scheduled to appear at the conference.

But McDaniel expressed confidence about Trump’s chances.

“So have at it. Go ahead. Waste your money, waste your time, and go ahead and lose,” she said.

The annual conference of hardcore conservatives began Wednesday at National Harbor, where the theme is “What Makes America Great” – a not-so-subtle play on Trump’s campaign slogan.

CPAC began its day with Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House Oversight Committee, and North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows, warning of the rise of socialism in the “radical” Democratic Party while saying they believe congressional Democrats are laying the foundation for Trump impeachment efforts.

The conference lasts until Saturday.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rn...ng-trump-primary-challenge-will-lose-horribly
Click to expand...

Meadows and Jordan? 2 of the biggest assholes in congress. :biglaugh::biglaugh:
 
MARIS61 said:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/236447/small-majority-say-country-best-days-ahead.aspx?g_source=link_NEWSV9&g_medium=TOPIC&g_campaign=item_&g_content=Small%20Majority%20in%20U.S.%20Say%20the%20Country's%20Best%20Days%20Are%20Ahead

Americans' Views of the United States' Best Years

When you think about the future of the United States -- which do you agree with more -- The country's best years are ahead of us (or) the country's best years are behind us?

Ahead of us Behind us No opinion
% % %
2018 Jun 18-24 55 41 4

2012 Dec 14-17 47 50 3
Click to expand...
in prison. lol
 
MARIS61 said:
RNC’s McDaniel at CPAC: GOPers mulling Trump primary challenge will ‘lose horribly’

By Alex Pappas | Fox News
Ronna McDaniel says the 2020 Democratic field is 'weak'

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – Don’t expect the RNC to be neutral if President Trump faces a Republican primary challenger in 2020, party leader Ronna McDaniel indicated to conservative activists Thursday.

McDaniel, the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, was asked by an interviewer during an appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference about the possibility that a Republican, such as former Ohio Gov. John Kasich or Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, could challenge Trump.

“They have the right to jump in and lose,” McDaniel said. “That’s fine. They’ll lose horribly.”

McDaniel said Trump is enormously popular in the party. He is scheduled to appear at CPAC on Saturday.

“Our country is booming,” McDaniel told radio host Vince Coglianese. “Jobs are coming back. Wages are up. Our military has been strengthened. Our veterans have been taken care of. Our trade deals are stronger. We have put rule of law judges at every level of the courts, including the Supreme Court with Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.”

McDaniel added: “What would any Republican be thinking saying, ‘this a guy I’m going to run against?’”

Both Kasich and Hogan are anti-Trump Republicans who have not yet ruled out a primary run. Former Republican Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld recently announced an exploratory committee. None of these Republicans is scheduled to appear at the conference.

But McDaniel expressed confidence about Trump’s chances.

“So have at it. Go ahead. Waste your money, waste your time, and go ahead and lose,” she said.

The annual conference of hardcore conservatives began Wednesday at National Harbor, where the theme is “What Makes America Great” – a not-so-subtle play on Trump’s campaign slogan.

CPAC began its day with Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House Oversight Committee, and North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows, warning of the rise of socialism in the “radical” Democratic Party while saying they believe congressional Democrats are laying the foundation for Trump impeachment efforts.

The conference lasts until Saturday.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rn...ng-trump-primary-challenge-will-lose-horribly
Click to expand...
That's the only place he's enormously popular.
 
Huge new $2,500 per child tax credits are now in effect.

A friend of mine just got $10,000 from the IRS for his 4 children + his withheld taxes for the year. Paid zero to the IRS. Got $10,000 from the IRS.

Over the next few months most Americans are going to see huge refunds to add to their higher paychecks, and know for certain that the Libs have been lying to them.

Trump approval rating already climbing.
 
MARIS61 said:
Huge new $2,500 per child tax credits are now in effect.[/B][/I]

A friend of mine just got $10,000 from the IRS for his 4 children + his withheld taxes for the year. Paid zero to the IRS. Got $10,000 from the IRS.

Over the next few months most Americans are going to see huge refunds to add to their higher paychecks, and know for certain that the Libs have been lying to them.

Trump approval rating already climbing.
Click to expand...

Fake news. Hard to believe anything else in your neat little story.
 
I got about 10k with 3 kids from the IRS this year, but believe me I didn't pay "zero" along the way.
 
MARIS61 said:
Huge new $2,500 per child tax credits are now in effect.

A friend of mine just got $10,000 from the IRS for his 4 children + his withheld taxes for the year. Paid zero to the IRS. Got $10,000 from the IRS.

Over the next few months most Americans are going to see huge refunds to add to their higher paychecks, and know for certain that the Libs have been lying to them.

Trump approval rating already climbing.
Click to expand...
His approval rating is topping out at 6% below his disapproval rating.
My God, man, the public overwhelmingly believes Cohen over him by something like 27%. He's a liar among many other devilish traits.
 
MARIS61 said:
Huge new $2,500 per child tax credits are now in effect.

A friend of mine just got $10,000 from the IRS for his 4 children + his withheld taxes for the year. Paid zero to the IRS. Got $10,000 from the IRS.

Over the next few months most Americans are going to see huge refunds to add to their higher paychecks, and know for certain that the Libs have been lying to them.

Trump approval rating already climbing.
Click to expand...
I got back a lot more than that with no kids although I'm relatively wealthy. Meanwhile, a lot of the lower middle class, that live out there near you, got back enough for a Big Mac with fries.
 
Perhaps the most overwhelming reason Trump will be re-elected is the fact that Dems in positions of power keep revealing how completely ignorant they are of the Constitution which they are hired to operate under, how blatantly obstructionist they are even when it endangers the lives and livelihoods of the American Citizens who are their only employers, and how mentally-deficient they are anytime they attempt to debate basic issues such as the economy, taxes, immigration, healthcare...

"Mad" Maxine Waters just now threw a schoolgirl tantrum at the hearing she is supposedly entrusted to conduct in an adult, professional manner. It was seriously cringe-worthy, even for her. When she's not randomly spewing hate she's actively inciting violence against conservative Politicians and conservative Americans. She just can't summon a display of adulthood no matter how hard she tries. Every time she is seen or heard on TV loses the Dems votes.

"Leaking" Adam Schiff has tripled-down on his 100% thoroughly debunked claim that he has seen evidence of crimes by the POTUS, but is meanwhile under a criminal investigation for illegal sharing of highly-classified information with the press. His resignation from his now-tainted Chairman position on the House Intelligence Committee has been demanded by all Republican members for obvious reasons and he'll soon be tweeting from the woods somewhere ala Comey. Every time he is seen or heard on TV loses the Dems votes.

"Incoherent" Nancy Pelosi has been a lame duck ever since she forced her way into her seat as speaker. She's increasingly unable to string more than half a dozen or so words together and often just gives up on finishing a statement and jumps off to some unrelated thought. It's obvious she's suffering from dementia and it's criminal that nobody has stepped forward and removed her from office in order to protect America. The corporate-owned "socialist"-newbies openly mock her and ignore her while her fellow deep-staters avoid her like the plague. Every time she is seen or heard on TV loses the Dems votes.
 
Lanny said:
I got back a lot more than that with no kids although I'm relatively wealthy. Meanwhile, a lot of the lower middle class, that live out there near you, got back enough for a Big Mac with fries.
Click to expand...

The median household income for La Pine is around $25,000 yr, which means most paid zero taxes or actually got additional income from the IRS.

Dems can pretty much write off any rural voters they used to have.
 
MARIS61 said:
The median household income for La Pine is around $25,000 yr, which means most paid zero taxes or actually got additional income from the IRS.

Dems can pretty much write off any rural voters they used to have.
Click to expand...

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!

La Pine is going to vote for Trump because the government gives them stuff.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
 
MARIS61 said:
The median household income for La Pine is around $25,000 yr, which means most paid zero taxes or actually got additional income from the IRS.

Dems can pretty much write off any rural voters they used to have.
Click to expand...
You must hate your laggard neighbors and they must enjoy the fruits they receive from the urban workers via the gummit.
 
The FBI should offer a reward for evidence or information leading to the discovery and apprehension of an honest Chicago government employee.

If such a person exists, he/she must be in hiding. :dunno:

Another conflict of interest pops up in Kim Foxx's handling of Jussie Smollett case

By Barnini Chakraborty | Fox News

Newly uncovered texts between Kim Foxx and staff shed light on handling of Jussie Smollett case
Prosecutor Kim Foxx compares Smollett's case with R. Kelly's; Trace Gallagher has the details.

The Cook County judge set to decide whether a special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate why charges were dropped against "Empire" actor Jussie Smollett has a son who works in the state's attorney's office.

The news sets up another potential conflict of interest with State's Attorney Kim Foxx's office and its handling of the controversial case.

Judge Leroy Martin Jr. addressed a petition Thursday filed by retired appellate Judge Sheila O'Brien to recuse himself and assign the case to a judge outside Cook County.

Martin's son, Leroy Martin III, is an assistant state's attorney who has worked under Foxx for more than a year. He was hired in April 2018.

"You're going to be deciding whether (Foxx), your son's boss, is teling the truth," O'Brien told Martin.

Martin said he would decide whether to recuse himself and set the next hearing on the matter for May 10.

“I think it is a problem,” CBS2 legal analyst Irv Miller said about Martin presiding over the case. “She’s the son’s employer. She controls his son’s pay, promotions. That’s why there is an appearance of impropriety.”

O'Brien has also asked for a special prosecutor to delve into the behind-the-scenes decision-making process in the Smollett case.

Foxx has publicly said she'd welcome an independent probe into her office's decision to dismiss a 16-count indictment against Smollett, who is accused of staging a hate crime on himself.

However, she filed a motion on Tuesday opposing the call for a special prosecutor made by O'Brien. Her office filed two other motions that day as well. One seeks to quash subpoenas for Foxx and her top assistant Joseph Magats and prevent O'Brien from requesting additional subpoenas. The other seeks the court's permission to allow Foxx's office and the county inspector general access to records that were sealed at the same hearing where prosecutors dropped all charges against Smollett.

The decision to drop the charges during an unannounced March hearing sparked outrage from the Chicago Police Department as well as outgoing Mayor Rahm Emanuel who blasted the move as a "whitewash of justice."

President Trump also weighed in on the case, calling it "an embarrassment to our nation" in a March 28 tweet.

O'Brien's petition calls out Foxx's handling of the case for saying she recused herself in the early stages of the investigation because she was in contact with a family member of Smollett only to claim recently that her recusal was not a recusal "in the legal sense" which would have required her entire office to withdraw from the prosecution.

O'Brien claims Foxx's comments and actions created "a perception that justice was not served here, that Mr. Smollett received special treatment."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top