Hickson contract situation

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

The reason was that you concocted a list to exclude Hickson, since he plays 28.9 mpg. Hickson never has foul problems, so the coach limits his minutes only to develop Leonard. Hickson's PER might even increase, not decrease, with more minutes.

Hickson's mpg didn't figure at all into my "list". I've posted 35+ minutes long before Hickson became a Blazer. Seems as if you're a bit confused. :dunno:
 
Talking to yourself again?

No, I realized the answer to my own question and gave it. But then PapaG said that it is a coincidence, i.e. the 35 mpg choice appearing to be for no reason other than to exclude Hickson. So I guess that his coincidence answer satisfactorally settles this controversy once and for all.
 
I dissagree and I said close to a max deal.

well "Mr ex kardashian" (Humphries) got a 2 yr 24 mil deal from the Nets after posting similat numbers as JJ. And next summer there are a lot of teams with a lot of capspace and overall it is a weak FA crop, so whattya think BG? He may not get 12 mil per but someone is likely going to overpay
 
well "Mr ex kardashian" (Humphries) got a 2 yr 24 mil deal from the Nets after posting similat numbers as JJ. And next summer there are a lot of teams with a lot of capspace and overall it is a weak FA crop, so whattya think BG? He may not get 12 mil per but someone is likely going to overpay

Someone will definitely give him a tidy sum.

Here's a link to current stats this season in comparison to LA:

http://www.basketball-reference.com...m=0&p1=aldrila01&y1=2013&p2=hicksjj01&y2=2013
 
Last edited:
I never said I didn't want Hickson back I just don't think he's going to come as cheap as some of you are talking about.
 
If he keeps up this level of production, its gonna take at least 10 mil/yr to keep him..And I still say it's well worth it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top