Hickson wants to stay in PDX

[ChadWick]

J.J. Hickson says he would like to stay in Portland, and enjoys playing here. I'm glad, hopefully price is right and we can keep him here!

“I can't get wrapped up in all of that. My agent will handle the business side,” Hickson told CSNNW.com. “I do want to let them know that I want to be here, but I'm just going to continue playing basketball.”

“I had a tough season in Sacramento,” Hickson said. “It was just different over there. There were a lot of things that factored into my play, but I could have done the same thing over there if I had the chance.”

I've been solid during my professional career and I don't expect that to change.”

Full Article
http://www.csnnw.com/pages/landingb...-in-Portland-Bla=1&blockID=687846&feedID=5212

 

[Shooter]

Hickson was a fantastic mid-season pickup, and we got him for nothing. Along with our two lottery picks, he is one of the biggest reasons we have a bright future.

 

[ChadWick]

Yeah I really like him, he's a mini Aldridge in a way, plays similar but different lol and they work nicely together

 

[PtldPlatypus]

Yep, I'm one of many who's pretty stoked about an Aldridge-Hickson frontcourt combo for the next few years. Solid pair. Not Gasol-Bynum by any means, but definitely has a shot to be one of the top tandems in the league.

 

[ChadWick]

Yep, I'm one of many who's pretty stoked about an Aldridge-Hickson frontcourt combo for the next few years. Solid pair. Not Gasol-Bynum by any means, but definitely has a shot to be one of the top tandems in the league.

Agreed. Bright future, both work well together w/ having same and also different strengths, a very versatile frontcourt!

 

[magnifier661]

I think Aldridge can play center and create a lot of havoc. Hickson is definitely a solid rebounder and scorer in the post. I think the combo is great!

 

[BoBoBREWSKI]

Love me some JJ!

 

[The_Lillard_King]

Hickson will shop his services and sign with the team that offers him the most money. Blazers have the advanatage of being able to match, but I doubt the fact that Hickson wants to stay in Ptd will have much effect on who he decides to sign a contract with.

 

[Mediocre Man]

I like Hickson as well, but I really hope we aren't seeing a player simply beasting for a contract.

 

[Ed O]

I love what Hickson's brought, and I think that the dearth of quality big men has been a problem for years (often exacerbated by injuries, of course).

He's young, he's got a reasonable track record, and he'll probably be cheap.

What's not to like?

Ed O.

 

[mook]

Hickson and Aldridge have started only one game together so far: http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/201204010POR.html
41 points, 17 rebounds is pretty good production from your starting bigs. But it was the T-Wolves.

Assuming Aldridge comes back this season, the only thing worth watching on this team is to see how those two play off each other, particularly on the defensive end. Hickson is a little short for a starting PF, but he's also very strong.

On offense I have no doubt they can put up points.

 

[The_Lillard_King]

I love what Hickson's brought, and I think that the dearth of quality big men has been a problem for years (often exacerbated by injuries, of course).

He's young, he's got a reasonable track record, and he'll probably be cheap.

What's not to like?

Ed O.

I don't think he is going to be cheap.

 

[Mediocre Man]

I don't think he is going to be cheap.

I don't either

 

[magnifier661]

I don't think he is going to be cheap.

Like give an example? Are you talking 9-10 mil PER?

 

[jlprk]

Hickson's value to us derives from Aldridge not playing an inside power game like Hickson. The reason they play differently is the NBA coaches they have had. If we get a more normal coach, he'll develop more Hicksons for the price of our draft pick each time.

This isn't rocket science. Get a coach without a weird system and we won't be so stoked by a normal PF.

 

[Ed O]

I don't think he is going to be cheap.

I don't either

Any team could have traded for him (presumably for almost anything) earlier this year. I don't think that (m)any teams will suddenly have a significantly higher opinion of him because of a couple good months on a mediocre Blazers team.

Ed O.

 

[The_Lillard_King]

Like give an example? Are you talking 9-10 mil PER?

At a minumum the MLE for the max amount of time, because many teams can offer that.

Apparently many teams are also under the cap so if money is being dished out this summer (which I think it will be), I see somewhere between 7-9. Not knowing team's situations and with the new CBA in effect, that is rough guess on my part, but I see overpaying going on this summer after the big names are off the table and include Hickson and Batum being in that batch.

 

[HailBlazers]

I doubt the fact that Hickson wants to stay in Ptd will have much effect on who he decides to sign a contract with.

Disagree, he's gotten more of a spotlight here in Portland than anywhere he's been. It's obvious he likes it and wants more.

 

[Mediocre Man]

Any team could have traded for him (presumably for almost anything) earlier this year. I don't think that (m)any teams will suddenly have a significantly higher opinion of him because of a couple good months on a mediocre Blazers team.

Ed O.

I would agree if he didn't also have some good seasons on the Cavs also. He is a 17/9 guy that will give you a little over 50% shooting from the field, a PER somewhere in the mid to high teens, and so far hasn't shown a knack for the injury bug.

I guess by cheap, I think he will command around 8-10 a year, which I don't think is cheap. It's also not ridiculous either

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

Any team could have traded for him (presumably for almost anything) earlier this year. I don't think that (m)any teams will suddenly have a significantly higher opinion of him because of a couple good months on a mediocre Blazers team.

Ed O.

I don't either. That being said, it seems his time in Sacto was more an aberration than the mean. He's a solid ballplayer, and he had been improving every year until the Sacto experience, and I think teams will take that into consideration. I could see him commanding at minimum $6-8 million, but I expect more, personally. Teams overspend big for quality big men.

And his time in Portland isn't just a flash in the pan. It could be said it's part of his continued trend of improvement with his growing experience in the league.

 

[The_Lillard_King]

Any team could have traded for him (presumably for almost anything) earlier this year. I don't think that (m)any teams will suddenly have a significantly higher opinion of him because of a couple good months on a mediocre Blazers team.

Ed O.

What's your guess on how much he will get offered?

 

[magnifier661]

I would agree if he didn't also have some good seasons on the Cavs also. He is a 17/9 guy that will give you a little over 50% shooting from the field, a PER somewhere in the mid to high teens, and so far hasn't shown a knack for the injury bug.

I guess by cheap, I think he will command around 8-10 a year, which I don't think is cheap. It's also not ridiculous either

If he is gonna give you a 17/9 and high teen PER; then 10 mil isn't expensive at all. If you can get a 20+ PER from Aldridge at Center and 17 PER from Hickson. That would give you a 40 point, 17 rebound per game @ 50% FG for your starting front court. Only Gasol and Bynum would give you better stats. But if Aldridge is making 13 mil and Hickson makes 10 = 23 mil per season; Bynum 16 mil and Gasol 18 mil are making 34 mil per season.

 

[Mediocre Man]

If he is gonna give you a 17/9 and high teen PER; then 10 mil isn't expensive at all. If you can get a 20+ PER from Aldridge at Center and 17 PER from Hickson. That would give you a 40 point, 17 rebound per game @ 50% FG for your starting front court. Only Gasol and Bynum would give you better stats. But if Aldridge is making 13 mil and Hickson makes 10 = 23 mil per season; Bynum 16 mil and Gasol 18 mil are making 34 mil per season.

I didn't say it was

 

[glazeduck]

I like Hickson as well, but I really hope we aren't seeing a player simply beasting for a contract.

We absolutely are.

Their names are Raymond Felton and Jamal Crawford.

 

[Mediocre Man]

We absolutely are.

Their names are Raymond Felton and Jamal Crawford.

Ha. That is some sad beasting

 

[RR7]

We absolutely are.

Their names are Raymond Felton and Jamal Crawford.

Feasting. What we've seen from Ray is feasting. not beasting.

 

[Ed O]

What's your guess on how much he will get offered?

MLE-ish. I don't see why many teams would eat into their salary cap space for a guy who seemed all but worthless a couple of months ago.

Ed O.

 

[PtldPlatypus]

MLE-ish. I don't see why many teams would eat into their salary cap space for a guy who seemed all but worthless a couple of months ago.

Ed O.

You may be right. Which then begs the question--if the best offer Hickson receives is MLE-ish, does he take it (hell, it IS $25M guaranteed), or does he accept the QO and play one more year here alongside Aldridge with the assumption that he can play himself into a much bigger payday next summer?

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

MLE-ish. I don't see why many teams would eat into their salary cap space for a guy who seemed all but worthless a couple of months ago.

Ed O.

Again, I'd argue his time in Sacto, or his "worthless" performance, was more an aberration than the mean. Simple as that. The guy was improving every year, and he's still 23.

Hell, I don't have to argue. This isn't opinion. It's based on facts of his historical stats (aside from a few minor decreases in stats last season, but several still improved). So, is a half-season enough to call Hickson "worthless"?

 

[Ed O]

Again, I'd argue his time in Sacto, or his "worthless" performance, was more an aberration than the mean. Simple as that. The guy was improving every year, and he's still 23.

What did other teams give up to get him?

His track record before arriving in Sacramento has not changed, and yet no team offered money or a second rounder or anything to acquire him. EVEN IF Sacramento made a mistake by waiving him (and they clearly did), that doesn't change that it appears that no team was that interested in acquiring him from them earlier in the year.

Hell, I don't have to argue. This isn't opinion. It's based on facts of his historical stats (aside from a few minor decreases in stats last season, but several still improved). So, is a half-season enough to call Hickson "worthless"?

I am not saying what you seem to think I am.

Ed O.