Hillary or The Donald-Which is Easier to Impeach?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Only one of them is going to be in court responding to child rape charges and another court responding to fraud charges this month. It would be funny to have a president-elect arrested before he even gets to take office. Save money on impeachment, though.
 
Plus the fact that you have absolutely no proof that even a subordinate did anything wrong. And no, you saying 'criminal' another hundred times doesn't prove your case.

The good thing about having a zillion Russian bots on your side is that you can say it a lot more than 100 times.
 
You need to visit an exorcist.

Immediately.

I've already talked to jlprk and 3RA1N1AC.

I love listening to Trump just fart out stuff and act like it's fact based.
 
you should totally see how desperate you are sounding.

The FBI chose to get a warrant to look at the emails and took the extraordinary step to announce it to the world.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/...e-of-classified-information-disclosure-229891

Prosecutor Leo Wise said that in early 2012 the retired military officer "provided and confirmed classified information, including TOP SECRET/SCI information" to Sanger and "confirmed classified information" to Klaidman. The prosecutor did not mention the still-classified Stuxnet program, but the investigation in question is known to involve release of information about the reported joint U.S.-Israel drive to use computer viruses to set back Iran's nuclear ambitions.
 
If it worked that way - that any offense by a subordinate is cause for impeachment - then probably every president would have been impeached.

You need to get a grip.

Plus the fact that you have absolutely no proof that even a subordinate did anything wrong. And no, you saying 'criminal' another hundred times doesn't prove your case.

barfo

The criminal running for president was involved. Her server, her emails, her devices, etc.
 
The potential criminal offenses which may (or may not) come out of the on-going FBI investigation.

So instead of acting as if it's a forgone conclusion, how about wait until they do or do not come out?

Trump is doing just that, he's acting like it's a forgone conclusion. And the less intelligent of his followers are totally eating it up as if it's facts.

This is just a continuation of the targeting of her..and after 25 years, they keep throwing shit at the wall and hoping it sticks. So far, nothing. If anything, she should be called Teflon Hil.
 
So instead of acting as if it's a forgone conclusion, how about wait until they do or do not come out?

Trump is doing just that, he's acting like it's a forgone conclusion. And the less intelligent of his followers are totally eating it up as if it's facts.

This is just a continuation of the targeting of her..and after 25 years, they keep throwing shit at the wall and hoping it sticks. So far, nothing. If anything, she should be called Teflon Hil.

That's a pretty accurate statement about what the Republicans have done. It doesn't apply to the FBI investigation, however. Comey already said that laws were broken in the mishandling of classified documents. What he didn't find was intent. If the new emails demonstrate intent to delete emails that were relevant to the investigation and which were subject to congressional subpoena, that's a problem for her. Yeah, we have to wait for the investigation to be concluded, but to take the approach that this is just the usual political political sniping at Hillary is really putting your head in the sand and hoping everything turns out okay.
 
That's a pretty accurate statement about what the Republicans have done. It doesn't apply to the FBI investigation, however. Comey already said that laws were broken in the mishandling of classified documents. What he didn't find was intent. If the new emails demonstrate intent to delete emails that were relevant to the investigation and which were subject to congressional subpoena, that's a problem for her. Yeah, we have to wait for the investigation to be concluded, but to take the approach that this is just the usual political political sniping at Hillary is really putting your head in the sand and hoping everything turns out okay.

We'd better burn her as a witch now just to be sure. Dangerous to wait, she might cast a spell on us.

Yes, if the new emails are actually new, and if they are actually relevant, and if they actually prove some crime, then there you go.

barfo
 
We'd better burn her as a witch now just to be sure. Dangerous to wait, she might cast a spell on us.

Yes, if the new emails are actually new, and if they are actually relevant, and if they are actually prove some crime, then there you go.

barfo

Hillary's boyfriend is that you? ;)
 
We'd better burn her as a witch now just to be sure. Dangerous to wait, she might cast a spell on us.

Yes, if the new emails are actually new, and if they are actually relevant, and if they actually prove some crime, then there you go.

barfo

Exactly. I'm willing to wait on lighting the bonfire until the results are in. You feel free to continue your "hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil" approach.
 
So Comey says there's no evidence that it happened, but an unnamed source says there's a 99% chance. Hmm, which to believe, which to believe....

barfo

Yes, I'm sure that those nasty Rooskies left Hillary's unprotected server alone while ferreting out thousands of emails from Podesta's account.
 
Yes, I'm sure that those nasty Rooskies left Hillary's unprotected server alone while ferreting out thousands of emails from Podesta's account.

Me too. Because at that time (March), Hillary's server was in the hands of the FBI.

barfo
 
Me too. Because at that time (March), Hillary's server was in the hands of the FBI.

barfo

That's a brilliant defense. Are you under the impression that hacking didn't exist prior to March of this year?
 
That's a brilliant defense. Are you under the impression that hacking didn't exist prior to March of this year?

Oh, well, since hacking did exist, therefore her server must have been hacked? How brilliant is that theory?

barfo
 
A sitting President can't be impeached for things that happened before he or she took office, right?
 
Oh, well, since hacking did exist, therefore her server must have been hacked? How brilliant is that theory?

barfo

Let's see, the number of foreign governments who maintain cyber intelligence-gathering operations is probably in double or triple digits. They've managed to break into even heavily protected government data files. But, yeah, I'm sure that they'd leave the Secretary of State's homebrew server alone.
 
Nixon Logs Burn to Ashes


The inside track on Washington politics.

Politics
July 1, 1998
Thousands of pages of history about Richard M. Nixon were tossed into a shredder at the National Archives last month. Just to make sure no one pieces them together again, archives officials had them stuffed into 126 burn bags and hurled into an incinerator at the Pentagon yesterday morning.

for many decades these were used daily
Nixon Logs Burn to Ashes



Politics
July 1, 1998
Thousands of pages of history about Richard M. Nixon were tossed into a shredder at the National Archives last month. Just to make sure no one pieces them together again, archives officials had them stuffed into 126 burn bags and hurled into an incinerator at the Pentagon yesterday morning.

A burn bag is the informal name given to a container (usually a paper bag or some other waste receptacle) that holds sensitive or classified documents which are to be destroyed by fire or pulping after a certain period of time. The most common usage of burn bags is by government institutions, in the destruction of classified materials.

Destruction via burn bags is considered superior to shredding, because shredded documents may be reconstructed. After the capture of the United States embassy in Tehran during the Iran hostage crisis, shredded documents were turned over for painstaking manual reconstruction, which revealed to Iran some U.S. operations including spies. A picture of one such reassembled document can be seen at the George Washington University website.[1] Today, scanners and computers can reconstruct shredded documents very quickly.[2] Burn bags are designed to facilitate the destruction process by not requiring the removal of the items to be destroyed beforehand and by indicating if the items require special procedures.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top