Hillary or The Donald-Which is Easier to Impeach?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Let's see, the number of foreign governments who maintain cyber intelligence-gathering operations is probably in double or triple digits. They've managed to break into even heavily protected government data files. But, yeah, I'm sure that they'd leave the Secretary of State's homebrew server alone.

Saying that everything gets hacked kind of undercuts the charge that she was careless by using her own server. If everything gets hacked, it doesn't matter where you put the emails.

We don't know whether her server was more or less secure than the State department server.

barfo
 
might want to rethink the email system of governing....pretty hard to hack a pile of ashes
 
A sitting President can't be impeached for things that happened before he or she took office, right?

The Constitution sets specific grounds for impeachment. They are “treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors.” To be impeached and removed from office, the House and Senate must find that the official committed one of these acts.

The Constitution defines treason in Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Constitution does not define bribery. It is a crime that has long existed in English and American common law. It takes place when a person gives an official money or gifts to influence the official’s behavior in office. For example, if defendant Smith pays federal Judge Jones $10,000 to find Smith not guilty, the crime of bribery has occurred.

...

The convention adopted “high crimes and misdemeanors” with little discussion. Most of the framers knew the phrase well. Since 1386, the English parliament had used “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, not spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery. Some of these charges were crimes. Others were not. The one common denominator in all these accusations was that the official had somehow abused the power of his office and was unfit to serve.

http://www.crf-usa.org/impeachment/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors.html

I don't see anything about the timing of when the offense occurred.

The pay to play allegations regarding Clinton's time as SoS and the Clinton Foundation could be one area she's vulnerable to impeachment on. No idea whether mishandling classified documents could be considered treason.

There's also no prohibition against filing criminal charges against a sitting president.
 
Saying that everything gets hacked kind of undercuts the charge that she was careless by using her own server. If everything gets hacked, it doesn't matter where you put the emails.

We don't know whether her server was more or less secure than the State department server.

barfo

Just because there's a lot of crime in the neighborhood doesn't mean you leave valuables you're charged with protecting on the coffee table with the door open as you go out for the evening.
 
The pay to play allegations regarding Clinton's time as SoS and the Clinton Foundation could be one area she's vulnerable to impeachment on. No idea whether mishandling classified documents could be considered treason.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top