- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 26,226
- Likes
- 14,407
- Points
- 113
I completely disagree, as evidenced by the fact that it wasn't Mario Chalmers or Udonis Haslem that played poorly and cost their team the series, but the "Most Talented Player in the Game" (TM).
I think you're trying to read my statement far too finely, that "talent beat pace in the Finals," which wasn't my intention at all. Both the Heat and Mavericks are extremely talented, so no matter which team won, "talent" was the reason they were in position to win a title and, ultimately, did so.
Unless you want to say that JJ Barea and Jason Terry are more talented than Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade?
I wouldn't want to say that. However, if the Finals had been three-on-three, I think the Heat would have won. Which team was more talented overall is a bit harder to say. The Heat unquestionably had the best three players, but whether they had the best seven or eight is quite a bit closer.
Not that it's relevant, given what I said above (that being, I wasn't arguing that talent was the difference between who won and lost the Finals series).
I do think coaching matters, largely in figuring out how to optimally leverage the talent of the players you have. I don't think the pace the team plays at matters (insofar as it doesn't undermine "leveraging the talents of your players").
Last edited:

