Wade Garrett
Exactly right.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2019
- Messages
- 1,971
- Likes
- 3,507
- Points
- 113
Yes, but he lost when Perry appealed the case.Didn't he win like 1 case?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, but he lost when Perry appealed the case.Didn't he win like 1 case?
Great find! I've never seen that one before but it looks awesome!We subscribe to a ton of expensive streaming services and all we watch is 50's Perry Mason's on our Roku stick.
Incidentally, if you want to see a completely other side to that actor, check out this awesome little noir gem:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0045877/?ref_=nm_flmg_t_32_act
Didn't he die pretty young? I guess if you live fast...OMG..That was fucking awesome!!
Thanks Rasta,, I will try to watch that..
Did you know that William Talman was quite the "partier"...I believe he was often "suspended" from PM due to some of his alleged extra-curricular activities...He was way ahead of his time when it came to how he hedonistically spent it...
Loved sex and drugs, and in 1950's-early 60's??..Taboo.
He lived from 1915 to 1968..He was arrested in 1960for marijuana possession and lewd vagrancy (nude swingers party at his house)Didn't he die pretty young? I guess if you live fast...
Directed by film-star (see High Sierra) turned-pioneering-director, Ida Lupino!Great find! I've never seen that one before but it looks awesome!
I COUNT THAT AS DYING YOUNG!!!He lived from 1915 to 1968
he was 53.....I count under 40 as young...I answered your other question in my post edit about his partyingI COUNT THAT AS DYING YOUNG!!!
he was 53.....I count under 40 as young...I answered your other question in my post edit about his partying
Darn Riv... 53 is supposed to be young.he was 53.....I count under 40 as young...I answered your other question in my post edit about his partying
Don't worry 'bout it man--long as you still got kids at home, you're still young in my book!Darn Riv... 53 is supposed to be young.
I had a lot of mileage by 53....I guess some folks are still young but in my view....at 53 you've probably started shrinking already...the trick is to age through middle age gracefully and 53 is middle aged, not old enough for senior discounts at the dump yet and probably too old to win an iron man event in Hawaii.Darn Riv... 53 is supposed to be young.
Not even doing Ironman any longer but I’m not gonna say I’m old yet! Nope! No way.I had a lot of mileage by 53....I guess some folks are still young but in my view....at 53 you've probably started shrinking already...the trick is to age through middle age gracefully and 53 is middle aged, not old enough for senior discounts at the dump yet and probably too old to win an iron man event in Hawaii.
Little guy took to the Dizzy Castle playground. You gotta work to keep up with them for a couple hours. Fun but not easy.Don't worry 'bout it man--long as you still got kids at home, you're still young in my book!
If we could just pair Sharpe with Wembenyama.....What's unreal is all the people on this board, before the season started, saying the Blazers should tank.
If we could just pair Sharpe with Wembenyama.....
Changed my mind back.I was pretty sure we wouldn't even make the play-in, particularly during the preseason. Now I think we'll make the play-in.
2 weeks later...But you've got to be thinking that we're better than a .500 team now... right?
yeah its tough to gauge when we've had so many injuries, but we are probably a .500 team, maybe modestly better if we can gel and stay healthy, nut that's about it IMOWe REALLY need a healthy Damian Lillard to really find out how real it really is. Payton wouldn’t hurt either.
the defense has gone to shit. dame ain't changing that.honestly, this is reminiscent of last year when it looked above average to start but went completely to hell once teams started figuring it out. Just lasted longer this year.
With a healthy Dame we're much better than this... that's all there is to it. I guess we'll all just wait and see.2 weeks later...
STOMP
Dame does change the defense actually. Our defensive rating is far better with Dame because our offensive efficiency is which gives us a chance to get set defensively. Also when our offense is clicking and our team is deeper it gives our guys more energy to do the things that make Chauncey ball effective.the defense has gone to shit. dame ain't changing that.honestly, this is reminiscent of last year when it looked above average to start but went completely to hell once teams started figuring it out. Just lasted longer this year.
While older players (even beloved ones) have honed their skills and understand how to win they also tend to miss more and more games as they age. Older fans have come to expect this as they've seen it play out many times. I'm hoping for a roster where the best players are more or less on the same time line so they can grow and eventually contend.With a healthy Dame we're much better than this... that's all there is to it. I guess we'll all just wait and see. 7-4 with Dame and 4-7 without him.
Those were long seasons.Many many moons ago, a coach named Maurice Cheeks looked at me and said, “Big John, it’s a LOOOONNG season.”
