- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,042
- Likes
- 10,821
- Points
- 113
Ok.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Finally, MarAzul for the win!![]()
I don't think so.Psst.... Marazul is saying you're the problem, lol.
I don't think so.
In mountain view, every house has a plum tree in the front yard. The trees are perfectly in a line. They dug up the plum orchard to build the subdivision and they left one tree for each home, front yard.
How wrong can you be?Also, it seems to me that complaining that all those other people had the FREEDOM to build houses in orchards, flood plains, and so on is just plain un-Libertarian.
barfo
Yes.
And so are you.
You're bitching about the building of houses for all of the people who moved to California when you're one of the people who moved to California.
That's not what MarAzul posted.
You might want to read what MarAzul actually posted.
Back then the population of California was about 10 million. Now the orchards of San Jose to San Diego are all but gone, replaced by about 27 million people and their lawns.
The farming in California built the reservoir system, but as the farms and orchards were replace with people, water resource development stopped and they fear to use what they have.
Look at this list of CA reservoirs and when they were constructed. Not much in the past 50 years while the States Population has went from 10 million to 37 million residences.
That's a statement of fact, not a statement about the cause of any problems.
There's plenty of water for the people. The orchards are irrelevant, other than government was willing to get them water but won't for homes.
Read the rest.
I'm not flailing. You're failing!I don't really care. California sucks. I just like watching you flail.
"water resource development"
True, development stopped and many existing reservoir pose a threat now, to a population that didn't exist when they were built. But the dams could be fixed.
The real problem is leadership. Back when the dams were constructed the farmers were Republicans, the state was republican but not now. That toggled rather rapidly over the past 30 years.
"Urban planners" are a new breed of democrat claricy. I don't know if it will ever occur to that crowd to build reservoirs in the mountains. Much easier to blame Global Goblins and lay a tax on
the goblin foot print. That will raise money to help the large underclass pay for the high priced water.
Screw the farmers, they are the uneducated problem.
But government simply failed
The list is quite long
That's not what MarAzul posted.
They fill the reservoirs 68% full because the dams were built a long time ago and aren't maintained well enough. They stopped "water resource development" instead of continuing it and now they're afraid to use the old infrastructure due to its neglect.
You might want to read what MarAzul actually posted.
The real problem is leadership.
If you eat nuts or vegetables, most likely they were grown here. 98.5% of all tomatoes eaten in the U.S. are grown here. Peaches. Olives. Grapes. Garlic.
Gee, why did they stop "water resource development"?
The answer is that "certain people" don't like to pay taxes.
barfo
As a new Libertarian, I don't believe in leadership. The natural order is the way California was before the politicians invaded. That's right, no reservoirs. No water.
Kick out the Mexicans! No public school for those kids. Keep them picking where they belong. Maybe rich Republicans will volunteer to replace them in the fields.
I'm fine with Mexicans and people of every other ethnicity. I'm for an open border in both directions, not building walls to keep you in.