...this supposedly happened over 3 years ago...I don't get it. Without realizing it, these kinds of accusations can actually have the reverse effect on females getting hired for certain jobs/positions and/or by male bosses.
these accusations, and I'm sure some are true, don't make sense as to why these The longer time passes b/t incidents, the less credible each story becomes, imo.
sexual harrasment (S/H) is one of few civil trials, that still carries unlimited punitive damage $$$ rewards....
ntm- numerous companies, and corporations would much rather settle out of court than face embarrasment of public exposure, or a jury's punitive damage $$$ rewards.
S/H claims have no statue of limitations, when even medical malpractice carries a 2 yr SOL in Ca.
Almost appears as if women coming out of the daily woodwork, see such suits as a Lotto chance, or possibly obtaining settlements, when companies don't wan't the costly courts, or negative publicity....
it's damn near endless, how easy it's become to claim S/H, and get away with it, even if it's questionable at best. What constitutes S/H in court can too often be simply over hearing a sexual joke, unbeknownst to those telling the joke, and dozens of other instances of what constitutes S/H....
I've personally seen women whose poor performance and/or attendance, was on the verge of termination; while those women filed S/H grievances to offset their well deserved terminations....Some get away with it, others get quelched and terminated for bringing on false claims....
On the other hand, the workplace, esp hollywood, or media co's, have been filthy dirty for decades; and what we're most likely seeing is just that, dirty business that's looked the other way for too long, and/or did nothing about it, like providing clearly defined s/h training, to every single employee, even the CEO et al, as too what is S/H....It's questionable at best at times, as too what constitutes S/H....
