People always have an always will see conspiracies where they don't exist. That Stern would have any special beef with Portland strikes me as extremely unlikely, and that the refs have a mandate to ensure that the team lost last night is laughable.
Ed O.
There are also always people who are duped by better then possible returns and the thought that a fellow Jewish man would never steal from Jewish charities. Yet Madoff did exactly that. He stole from people who trusted him in a vast ponzi scheme. This from a former chairman of the SEC who supposedly was regulating Wall Street.
Unfortunately, people WANT to believe that good triumphs over evil and that most people are good. I believe, in fact, that most people are good. However, people in power are more likely then little folk to be corrupt (power corrupts etc.). Sadly society goes after little guys with three strikes you are out laws and lets white collar criminals off on technicalities thanks to million dollar legal teams.
You say conspiracies don't exist and yet prisons exist, conspiracy to commit ***** exists as a legal term. (**** = murder, fraud etc.) Various mafia's and gangs exist. Vast systemic fraud has and is occurring on Wall Street and in the banking sector, there are corrupt DEA officials etc. etc. etc.
The reason the
NBA related conspiracy theories actually have merit is two-fold: one an insider rolled over on them and two
an organized crime investigator from the FBI stated that Donaghy's statements and his investigation are consistent with organized crime being commited with the NBA's collusion.
This isn't a midnight meeting at the docks Ed, it's a highly reliable FBI agent who protected America against Al Qaeda and went after the Gambino crime family. His word holds a hell of a lot more water then Stern's word that "everything is hunky dory and no investigation is needed."
So many of Stern's policies since the late 80's are questionable. The first being the disolving of the independent Referee's Union the second being the zero tolerance stance on criticizing the refs. There is no harm done by criticizing the refs, unless you don't want attention attracted to the fact that the refs ARE either making large mistakes consistently OR actively manipulating game and series outcomes.
Finally, the NBA doesn't pay the smell test for me and anecdotal evidence based on 25 years of watching the game rather closely have shown a consistent biais to big market teams and especially "Super Star" players. The Super Star call is absolutely unequivocably a fact. If the NBA skews the game towards Super Stars why do we believe the manipulation of the game ends there?
There are 100's of millions if not many billions of dollars per year at stake between advertising, merchandise and sports betting (mafia) and yet we think there is no impetus to rig the outcome? People talk about the risk of doing it out weighing the bad. Well, Donaghy came out, the FBI guy said his piece and here we are two years later and no transparent investigation has occurred. Too many pieces fit the puzzle. This could all be solved by an independent outside audit of referee's with full access to NBA confidential files. That however, is precisely what Stern has made clear will NOT happen.
Whenever the people who have the most to lose want no investigation by an outside independent auditor my radar goes off. Just saying.