No one is questioning Hank at all. Everyone knows how great he is and has been, and what he has done for this team for years is beyond discussion. The question is, and it is a darn fair one, is having a goalie with an 8.5 mill cap hit a winning recipe? I am not sure of the answer, but I do think it is a fair question and something to wonder. That is a huge cap hit in goal, and even though Hank is great it isn't like he is SO much better than any goalie...or you need to have a crazy top level goalie to win a cup. It is certainly a fair discussion, and that is no knock on Hank at all. He has earned the money no doubt, but that isn't the debate IMO.
As for Yandle...to me it is as simple. If the Rangers cannot deal Staal or Girardi I just don't see how they can keep Yandle. And that isn't because literally they cannot find a way to actually fit him under the cap...it is because their cap balance would be a HUGE disaster if we have Hank at 8.5, G at 5.5, Staal at 5.7, McD, at 4.7, and Yandle at 5.5 or so I would guess. That is an absolute recipe for unbalance against the cap. No way they can do that, and if they do Gorton should be called out immediately.
Maybe you could argue resign Yandle knowing that next summer G loses his full NMC and you can deal him then, but even at that point you play a dangerous game of chicken...can you deal G for sure next summer AND how does the balance look next season with Hank and 4 dmen locked up for big money. How the F do we have a good winning balance next season.
I couldn't do it unless I can deal Staal or G after this season. And that isn't a knock on Yandle and the element he adds, even though he is "questionable" in his own zone as dump says. Yandle is obviously very gifted with the puck, and adds an element few dmen do, but we cannot put ourselves in that kind of position against the cap IMO.