- Joined
- Jul 15, 2007
- Messages
- 14,391
- Likes
- 7,758
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He IS a tiny dick.lol Jesus Christ… they just can’t accept he has a tiny dick.
Narrators Voice: "They won't"*smiling in an increasingly tense grimace* "I wonder what center-left liberals will do with a conservative doing little crossdressing in his younger days. I sure hope they keep it chill."
*smiling in an increasingly tense grimace* "I wonder what center-left liberals will do with a conservative doing little crossdressing in his younger days. I sure hope they keep it chill."
Or for sexual pleasure. Which is what most "transwomen" are actually doing.Straight cis men dressing as women for a joke is hardly new.
That's not true and you know it, you're just trying to be as big of an ass as possibleOr for sexual pleasure. Which is what most "transwomen" are actually doing.
Ugh.Rumor has it he went by Anita Couch and Ashley Furniture.
Pro-foxhunting group says UK hunters should be protected ethnic minority
Chair of Hunting Kind says he has built legal case to obtain same protection as Roma and LGBTQ+ people
A pro-foxhunting group says it has prepared a legal case to try to prove that hunters are an ethnic minority whose hunts should be protected under equality laws.
Ed Swales, the chair of Hunting Kind, claims he has been advised by a leading human rights lawyer that hunters unequivocally qualify for legal protection under the UK Equality Act 2010.
Speaking to the FieldsportsChannel podcast, Swales said: “The qualifications of an ethnic group, there are five of them, and we hit everyone straight in the bullseye.”
He said he had spent three years preparing a legal challenge that had now been reviewed by a human rights KC “who sits on the council of the European court of human rights”.
Swales said: “The outcome of that from the human rights silk is that as a protected minority group under the Equality Act, we qualify, undoubtedly 10 out of 10.”
He said the group would try to mount legal challenges to prove that those who support hunting have suffered discrimination such as losing work or contracts, or been abused on social media. If successful, such action would give hunters the same protection as minority groups such as the Roma community or LGBTQ+ groups.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...oup-says-uk-hunters-protected-ethnic-minority
Lol. I hope she wins a couple billion off of them.
Lol. I hope she wins a couple billion off of them.
So they can be arrested?The linked article from Variety indicates that what was filed was not a lawsuit, but a criminal complaint with the French authorities.
Potentially. Although I have no idea if "cyberbullying" accusations can result in arrest, or simply citation.So they can be arrested?
Boudi also claimed that while the [complaint] was filed in France, “it could target personalities overseas,” pointing out that “the prosecutor’s office for combating online hate speech has the possibility to make requests for mutual legal assistance with other countries.” He added that there were agreements with the U.S. equivalent of the French office for combating online hate speech.
The [complaint] was filed against X, which under French law means that it was filed against unknown persons. That “ensure that the ‘prosecution has all the latitude to be able to investigate against all people,” including those who may have written hateful messages under pseudonyms, said Boudi.
I don't think platypuses should be allowed in the Olympics.Potentially. Although I have no idea if "cyberbullying" accusations can result in arrest, or simply citation.
Presumably, if there were agreements with the US government, there are likely similar agreements with the UK.
Should also be noted that while Musk and Rowling are named, the investigation is by no means limited to them.
Hopefully nobody's posts in here could qualify as cyber-bullying...
Egglayist!I don't think platypuses should be allowed in the Olympics.
Reasonable. We would dominate in the pool.I don't think platypuses should be allowed in the Olympics.
Skip forward to 42:00 when they start talking about the transgender treatment issue.
Bias?Why? One of them does game shows and the other believes fracking can solve global warming. What do they reasonably bring to this conversation?