Phatguysrule
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2008
- Messages
- 21,333
- Likes
- 18,151
- Points
- 113
I'm sorry, but I don't find that tweet to be worth investigating.It was mentioned in the tweet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sorry, but I don't find that tweet to be worth investigating.It was mentioned in the tweet?
The only investigation I did was...reading the post. I similarly have no interest in looking up "reduxxmag", but it's not hard to discern the source of the claim.I'm sorry, but I don't find that tweet to be worth investigating.
That's not a source. A huge part of our problem is that we consider it okay to spread BS based on that kind of thing as a "source".The only investigation I did was...reading the post. I similarly have no interest in looking up "reduxxmag", but it's not hard to discern the source of the claim.
Most times, when a tweet is in picture form, it's because of two reasons. In case the person takes it down and thus, you have proof...OR it's bullshit and don't want people actually sourcing things.Then post the source document.
The only investigation I did was...reading the post. I similarly have no interest in looking up "reduxxmag", but it's not hard to discern the source of the claim.
AgreedMost times, when a tweet is in picture form, it's because of two reasons. In case the person takes it down and thus, you have proof...OR it's bullshit and don't want people actually sourcing things.
Stick your head in the sand then.I'm sorry, but I don't find that tweet to be worth investigating.
That is an opinion piece. I see no evidence there.Stick your head in the sand then.
It's even being reported by the NY Post now. Anyone who isn't completely deranged on this issue could see the dude is a...dude. The women he beat up knew.
These are documents leaked from a hospital by a French journalist. If he fabricated that report he'd have his ass sued off.
https://nypost.com/2024/11/04/opini...hone_nyp&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
That is an opinion piece. I see no evidence there.
I scanned it... saw nothing that looked like evidence, then closed it. I don't even know if the document exists. Let alone what it actually says.Then you didn't read it. It's not only "opinion". You'd have to assert that the documents this is based on are fraudulent.
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/11...ho-use-public-restrooms-makes-law-even-worse/
On Tuesday, the Odessa City Council voted 5-1 to maintain its bathroom ban and allow individual citizens (whether or not they are Odessa or even Texas residents) to sue a trans person for a minimum of $10,000 in damages if they violate it (there is no cap on how large the bounty can be). It also approved an expansion of the law. Once applied only to public facilities, it will now apply to private ones as well.
Hopefully all of it. Everything.And how much can a woman sue for if she is falsely accused?
I didn't say that there are or were Olympic level trans athletes.You don’t want it to be applicable because you don’t want to look bad. Name these Olympic level trans athletes who were JV before. I want evidence if you’re going to act like you’re an authority.
Being unfair to trans women and only trans women is the compromise. Fucking lol yeah a lot of democrats are going to sweep us under the rug. Inconvenient to the cause and all that horseshit.
Those other things are easily disproven. The fact is that we do need rules dividing women's divisions from mens. The vast majority of female competitors do not want to compete against people who have the advantages that men do. And there is a MOUNTAIN of evidence that men have significant advantages athletically. Far more so than the typical variance among either gender.Forty trans athletes among more than half a million. The volleyball player in San Jose played two previous years and in high school and had no special advantage.
If people voted Republican because they feared trans athletes it's the same as those who voted to ban marriage equality. Who feared gays in the military saying straight soldiers would get assaulted in showers which never happened. Who opposed integration because different germs. Who are convinced there is "migrant crime wave" no matter how many times fact that immigrants commit fewer crimes is repeated.
In other words, sucked into hate campaign against someone seen as other. For them to say it wasn't prejudice is just self justification.