OT "I'm Dealing With A Few Transgender Issues"

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Status
Not open for further replies.
ABM said:
This is what crandc said:



I simply disagreed. Charlie Kirk did not "blame" inflation on transgender people. He made two separate comparisons. There's a difference.
Click to expand...
Uh huh.

Do you have a crush on Charlie Kirk?

I suggest you send him a letter asking him to be your boyfriend. You can even add a check yes or no box on the letter for him to give you an answer.
 
SlyPokerCat said:
Uh huh.

Do you have a crush on Charlie Kirk?

I suggest you send him a letter asking him to be your boyfriend. You can even add a check yes or no box on the letter for him to give you an answer.
Click to expand...

Not at all. Again, I replied to crandc. slydog rushed to her defense. As per usual.
 
ABM said:
Not at all. Again, I replied to crandc. slydog rushed to her defense. As per usual.
Click to expand...

No I didn't. I made no comment. I only provided information that directly applied to what was being discussed.
 
ABM said:
Well, good golly, then. My bad.
Click to expand...

Why are you like this? Like seriously, explain it to me. Why are you the way you are? Why do you choose to be this way?

See, I have a hard time understanding experiences that aren't my own, and as a result I doubt their intentions. Maybe if you explained to me why you act like you do, that would help.

I'm just asking.
 
YamTastic said:
Why are you like this? Like seriously, explain it to me. Why are you the way you are? Why do you choose to be this way?

See, I have a hard time understanding experiences that aren't my own, and as a result I doubt their intentions. Maybe if you explained to me why you act like you do, that would help.

I'm just asking.
Click to expand...

Why, simply because I challenged what someone said? (....which was totally untrue, by the way.) Then bagged on sly, thinking he was rushing to defend her? There's a bit of history there that you've probably missed. I see sly as giving her a pass at every corner, every context, every debate, every issue. I'm a completely different individual, and I have all the right in the world to defend my positions. In doing so, I don't necessarily toe the corporate line unless it involves abiding by the rules of condust in here.
 
ABM said:
Why, simply because I challenged what someone said? (....which was totally untrue, by the way.) Then bagged on sly, thinking he was rushing to defend her? There's a bit of history there that you've probably missed. I see sly as giving her a pass at every corner, every context, every debate, every issue. I'm a completely different individual, and I have all the right in the world to defend my positions. In doing so, I don't necessarily toe the corporate line unless it involves abiding by the rules of condust in here.
Click to expand...

What exactly has she done wrong?

What exactly do you want me to do to her?
 
SlyPokerDog said:
What exactly has she done wrong?

What exactly do you want me to do to her?
Click to expand...

She was born with female body parts, and thus, should be subservient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
YamTastic said:
Why are you like this? Like seriously, explain it to me. Why are you the way you are? Why do you choose to be this way?

See, I have a hard time understanding experiences that aren't my own, and as a result I doubt their intentions. Maybe if you explained to me why you act like you do, that would help.

I'm just asking.
Click to expand...
You’re obviously new here. That individual does not provide answers, only provocation. He obviously didn’t get many hugs as a child. Negative attention is better than no attention………
 
SlyPokerDog said:
What exactly has she done wrong?

What exactly do you want me to do to her?
Click to expand...

I simply said you've seemingly rushed to support her every accusation/rant. Me? Not so much. That's OK, though. Simply an observation. She's done nothing wrong, and you really don't have to do a thing. If you'd like to discuss any further feel free to PM me. Happy Saturday! :)
 
ABM said:
Why, simply because I challenged what someone said? (....which was totally untrue, by the way.) Then bagged on sly, thinking he was rushing to defend her? There's a bit of history there that you've probably missed. I see sly as giving her a pass at every corner, every context, every debate, every issue. I'm a completely different individual, and I have all the right in the world to defend my positions. In doing so, I don't necessarily toe the corporate line unless it involves abiding by the rules of condust in here.
Click to expand...
Why wouldn't Sly agree with her when he agrees with her?

I'm not understanding the problem here, but it's something happening more and more often.

Several times I've personally seen kids who are "proud to be Republicans" get offended because somebody called them republican.

I've seen posters in here act as victims because other posters refuse to agree with republican (right wing?) talking points.

Much like you're doing now. What's up with that?
 
Last edited:
278483088_682644436332195_3512336067827637840_n.png
 
ABM said:
Go back and read the exchange.

It began here:
Click to expand...
Yeah, I read that. I don't think she was wrong. As the following links showed.

There is no connection, and he would not have tried so hard to make that connection unless he were trying to stir up I'll will toward transgenders.

I don't think blame is necessarily too strong a word.

He was wrong, 100%.
 
Last edited:
Phatguysrule said:
Yeah, I read that. I don't think she was wrong. As the following links showed.

There is no connection, and he would not have tried so hard to make that connection unless he were trying to stir up I'll will toward transgenders.

I don't think blame is necessarily too strong a word.

He was wrong, 100%.
Click to expand...


Well, cool, then. You're up to speed. :cheers:
 
ABM said:
Did I say I had a problem? Conversely, others seem to have problems with me. That's OK, though.
Click to expand...
You said you bagged on Sly for rushing to crans aid, I asked why he wouldn't do that, when he agrees to with her. You then implied that I wasn't up on the conversation, and recounted it for me. I was up on the conversation.

Again, how are you being slighted here?

I'm not trying to be argumentative, just trying to understand why I'm seeing so much of this from "conservatives"...
 
ABM said:
Why, simply because I challenged what someone said? (....which was totally untrue, by the way.) Then bagged on sly, thinking he was rushing to defend her? There's a bit of history there that you've probably missed. I see sly as giving her a pass at every corner, every context, every debate, every issue. I'm a completely different individual, and I have all the right in the world to defend my positions. In doing so, I don't necessarily toe the corporate line unless it involves abiding by the rules of condust in here.
Click to expand...

Sorry that I'm just now getting back to you on this. We had our 6yr old grandduaghter's birthday party to set up. Fun age, young enough to still believe in a lot of crazy as shit, but old enough to be very particular.

I have never met or spoken to Crandc outside of this forum, but in reading her posts over the years, I've learned that whether it is man, woman, or dog, she does not need anyone defending her. I would even go so far to say that you suggesting that she does is insulting. (Not saying it's a personal insult.)

Crandc does not need me to defend her, she does just fine on her own.
 
Phatguysrule said:
You said you bagged on Sly for rushing to crans aid, I asked why he wouldn't do that, when he agrees to with her. You then implied that I wasn't up on the conversation, and recounted it for me. I was up on the conversation.

Again, how are you being slighted here?

I'm not trying to be argumentative, just trying to understand why I'm seeing so much of this from "conservatives"...
Click to expand...

I told him my bad for thinking he had rushed in again. Simple as that. However, there are plenty other discussions in here that have gone down that road. He's a liberal. I get that. He also runs this place. I invited him to PM me if he wanted to discuss further.
 
Phatguysrule said:
You said you bagged on Sly for rushing to crans aid, I asked why he wouldn't do that, when he agrees to with her. You then implied that I wasn't up on the conversation, and recounted it for me. I was up on the conversation.

Again, how are you being slighted here?

I'm not trying to be argumentative, just trying to understand why I'm seeing so much of this from "conservatives"...
Click to expand...

They see liberals saying something or acting a certain way and don't believe said thing is happening to them. So instead of acting like adults they decided they would start over the top acting how they think liberals are acting to prove their point.

Only in a lot of cases they aren't smart enough to do it right, and will respond with flippant and totally unrelated points. Usually compiled of talking points they send out to each other, in a network of emails titled " how to pwn liberals in 5 simple steps".

Nothing more, nothing less.
 
ABM said:
I told him my bad for thinking he had rushed in again. Simple as that. However, there are plenty other discussions in here that have gone down that road. He's a liberal. I get that. He also runs this place. I invited him to PM me if he wanted to discuss further.
Click to expand...
What's the benefit of the PM?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top