In case of League Expansion: Who would you protect?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Where would people put Duren/CJ/Nance/Norm/Roco on their list? I think I'd add them like this;

1 Sharpe
2 Dame
I Duren
3 Simons
II Norm
III CJ
4 Hart
5 Grant
IV Roco
V Nance
6 Nas
7 GP2
8 Nurk

Crazy to think how many great guards and mediocre bigs this franchise has had the last two years.

I misssed it...how did Duren become a Blazer?

anyway, I'd put both Hart and Grant above CJ and Norm. Nurk too
 
Where would people put Duren/CJ/Nance/Norm/Roco on their list? I think I'd add them like this;

1 Sharpe
2 Dame
I Duren
3 Simons
II Norm
III CJ
4 Hart
5 Grant
IV Roco
V Nance
6 Nas
7 GP2
8 Nurk

Crazy to think how many great guards and mediocre bigs this franchise has had the last two years.
Yeah, especially since it was a strength down low for about 25 years (1990-2015): Buck, Cliff, BG, Sheed, Trent, JO, Kemp, ZBo, Aldridge).
 
I misssed it...how did Duren become a Blazer?

anyway, I'd put both Hart and Grant above CJ and Norm. Nurk too
Duren was traded for what we gave up for Grant. So no the Blazers didn't acquire him but a competent GM could've got him instead of Grant.
 
Sharpe over Dame? You can't be serious.
I have no problem flipping Sharpe and Dame, yes most Blazer fans would have Dame higher. If we see Dame healthy I'd move him higher, he has more downside risk on the massive contract if he can't get healthy.

The rankings are value of the player, guys like Dame Nurk Grant are much lower than they're pure worth on a court because they're on huge contracts. Rookies have potential to be a starter plus let the team add another starter with that salary slot which is a game changing benefit to a franchise with cheap ownership.
 
Duren was traded for what we gave up for Grant. So no the Blazers didn't acquire him but a competent GM could've got him instead of Grant.

ok...I just saw that you had both Duren and Grant on the list and I didn't know how Portland managed that

as far as a competent GM preferring Duren to Grant, that's extremely debatable.
 
Last edited:
ok...as if "competent" GM's always match fan perspective. I'd say that is a massive case of Duren = grass is greener vs Grant = familiarity breeds contempt

if Duren is strictly a C, or even mostly a C, Grant is a better option with Nurkic on board
Duren would've been the right move in a scenario where Dame was traded, but we all know that wasn't happening.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top