Politics Iran says this is over if we don't retaliate

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

If you're Trump, do you retaliate or let it go?

  • Total voters
    15

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
donkiez said:
Idk Pete is basically young gay Biden and Amy is basically young female Biden. Feel free to pick your Biden flavor.
Click to expand...

In terms of policy, sure, that's plausible. In terms of being favored members of the political 'establishment', which I think was what Bodyman was suggesting, not really.

barfo
 
Lanny said:
That doesn't make sense and here's why.
He's a homosexual and would lose votes in a general election just because of that. They want to beat Trump in the worst way so you'd think they'd pick someone, if they were the picking sort, who would get the most votes rather than Mayor Pete.
Click to expand...
They don't put all their money on one horse right away.

They clutter up the field with puppets.

I can't seriously imagine why you guys would pretend the identity politics party wouldn't pick a guy like Buttigiggity on the off chance he catches a wave of popularity.
 
barfo said:
In terms of policy, sure, that's plausible. In terms of being favored members of the political 'establishment', which I think was what Bodyman was suggesting, not really.

barfo
Click to expand...
Not what I was suggesting. That of which you speak is covered by Biden and Warren quite nicely.

Butttiggigggg is their long shot "diversity" draft pick.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Not what I was suggesting. That of which you speak is covered by Biden and Warren quite nicely.

Butttiggigggg is their long shot "diversity" draft pick.
Click to expand...

Ok. Seems like Booker or Harris would have been a more obvious diversity draft pick, no?

barfo
 
barfo said:
Ok. Seems like Booker or Harris would have been a more obvious diversity draft pick, no?

barfo
Click to expand...

No.

Obama was the party's worst, most divisive President since Johnson, and Dems think "they're" all alike.

Racist Dems have refused to support either of them with money or words.
 
barfo said:
Ok. Seems like Booker or Harris would have been a more obvious diversity draft pick, no?

barfo
Click to expand...
I don't think they could control Booker and until Tulsi destroyed Harris she was one of their group of puppets.

The neolibs cover their bases. Not my fault the "progressive" Democrats routinely picked the white candidates when polled.

You have to admit Booker and his buggy eyes aren't even remotely as polished as Obama was.

Harris being an evil lying prosecutor wasn't going to get the black vote.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
I don't think they could control Booker and until Tulsi destroyed Harris she was one of their group of puppets.

The neolibs cover their bases. Not my fault the "progressive" Democrats routinely picked the white candidates when polled.

You have to admit Booker and his buggy eyes aren't even remotely as polished as Obama was.

Harris being an evil lying prosecutor wasn't going to get the black vote.
Click to expand...
Do you have a link showing that Harris was unpopular with the Black vote? The reason I ask is that I've never heard this before and would like to see it in black and white (newsprint color).
 
Lanny said:
Do you have a link showing that Harris was unpopular with the Black vote? The reason I ask is that I've never heard this before and would like to see it in black and white (newsprint color).
Click to expand...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...t-traction-with-demographics-she-needed-most/

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/04/kamala-harris-black-voters-2020-075651

This one I hadn't read because it is The Root which isn't my lane obviously. It seems to discount the prosecutor stuff and attribute it to what I see with Booker....

https://www.theroot.com/does-kamala-harris-have-a-working-class-black-man-probl-1835424646
 
Apparently we have a war monger in this forum and in this thread. Let's play Where's the War Monger.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...t-traction-with-demographics-she-needed-most/

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/04/kamala-harris-black-voters-2020-075651

This one I hadn't read because it is The Root which isn't my lane obviously. It seems to discount the prosecutor stuff and attribute it to what I see with Booker....

https://www.theroot.com/does-kamala-harris-have-a-working-class-black-man-probl-1835424646
Click to expand...
1. I typically can't get either the Washington Post or the New York Times. They want subsriptions;
2. Your other links provide no numbers. All they say is that she should be more popular with Blacks. So, what does that mean in terms of quantifiers?
 
Lanny said:
1. I typically can't get either the Washington Post or the New York Times. They want subsriptions;
2. Your other links provide no numbers. All they say is that she should be more popular with Blacks. So, what does that mean in terms of quantifiers?
Click to expand...

The Post link works fine, never requires a subscription.

He didn't provide a NYT link, it's a Politico link and The root.

All 3 work, no subscription required.

Summon up some courage and read them, I promise you it will all be okay.
 
MARIS61 said:
The Post link works fine, never requires a subscription.

He didn't provide a NYT link, it's a Politico link and The root.

All 3 work, no subscription required.

Summon up some courage and read them, I promise you it will all be okay.
Click to expand...


You "promise"?...and why would anyone with even a modicum of sense take your word for it?
 
MARIS61 said:
The Post link works fine, never requires a subscription.

He didn't provide a NYT link, it's a Politico link and The root.

All 3 work, no subscription required.

Summon up some courage and read them, I promise you it will all be okay.
Click to expand...
The first link was the Washington Post link.
No, the Washington Post and the New York Times both REQUIRE a subscription when you exceed your limit for the month. i.e. you get a few links before you are prohibited for the remainder of the month. Didn't you know this?

I never mentioned that the NY Times was mentioned by bodyman. I just threw it in for future reference when thinking about posting a link from either the Washinton Post or the New York Times.

His other links provided no quantifiers. I know quantifiers is a big word that I orangely picked up from my science and engineering courses but it was applicable here.

The expression 'orangely' was obtained from my covfefe dictionary. I presume that you recognize that dictionary, if not I'll translate it to English upon request.

I didn't need to summon up any courage to read the articles because I took a stab, read the articles until I could see that there were no quantifiers.

Sorry to break your bubble but I do respect Bodyman and always have and so I looked at all of his links.
 
Last edited:
There is a new report of 11 USA military personnel injured in the Iranian missile attack.

Several were flown to a hospital in Germany with concussion symptoms.

All 11 are expected to recover, and return to military service.
 
Bit weird that they kept it secret until now. To what end?

barfo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top