Is This a Hate Crime?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Was there ever any reason to think it was a hate crime?

People who jump right to race whenever anything bad happens annoy the fuck out of me.

No, there is no evidence or reason to think this is a "hate crime".

You can say the same thing with George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin.

but the media runs with it.

Face it. Any time its black on black or black on white, people put culpability on someone else (i.e. bus driver, society at large, etc)
When its white on black, hate crimes and civil rights violations IMMEDIATELY enter the mix.
 
Last edited:
You can say the same thing with George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin.

but the media runs with it.

Face it. Any time its black on black or black on white, people through culpability on someone else (i.e. bus driver, society at large, etc)
When its white on black, hate crimes and civil rights violations IMMEDIATELY enter the mix.


Repped for truth
 
You can say the same thing with George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin.

but the media runs with it.

Face it. Any time its black on black or black on white, people put culpability on someone else (i.e. bus driver, society at large, etc)
When its white on black, hate crimes and civil rights violations IMMEDIATELY enter the mix.

I have said the same thing with Zimmerman/Martin many times and I completely agree with this post.
 
3 on 1 and the kid didn't have to pull a gun and kill the others to save his life.
 
Thd 3 black kids should plead Stand Your Ground. All the innocents did was to approach the white kid, obviously follow him, demand he stop, get into a fight with him...too bad they weren't armed as every American should be. The white kid would be dead and they'd be found not guilty under the Stand Your Ground law.
 
So the reports of the three guys calling the kid "white boy" while beating him isn't racism, it's just a statement of fact.

Calling him white boy clearly qualifies this as a hate crime under the federal statutes.
 
3 on 1 and the kid didn't have to pull a gun and kill the others to save his life.

Might be the most retarded post you've ever typed.

Google search of "man beaten to death" brings About 63,800,000 results (0.35 seconds) .

3 bullets right then and there would have saved countless future victims from these worthless animals. Does anyone doubt they will all lead career-criminal lives, probably including murdering people?
 
It's our duty to look at each issue as it comes up and use our own judgement. No reason to enter with bias from either side, immediately certain that it's racially based or not racially based. And all this pointing the other direction, hey look a white guy was wronged by a black, is just rude and makes you guys look hateful. Sometimes there will be "reverse racism" and it will be evident. But don't do exactly what you seem angry at Sharpton/Jackson at doing, coming to racial conclusions far sooner than is warranted just to get those black folk back for thinking things are racially based. That's horseshit.

Maybe you could quote where I said anything remotely like what you are saying I said?

Go Blazers
 
There should be no such thing as a hate crime. It's a load of crap that someone who kicks the shit out of someone in order to take his money is treated any differently than someone who kicks the shit out of someone, takes his money, and calls him names.
 
A fan, no, I don't have any Sharpton Jersey's.

But I do think that the majority of the issues they bring to our attention are relevant and should be looked at. There is racism and it needs to be addressed. I do think they sometimes go overboard, having spent so much of their lives on that singular issue, they sometimes see race playing an issue where it didn't, or think someones motivations were racially based when they weren't. Sharpton and Jackson do play an important roll in society, and the that's important. Just because not every issue they focus on is clear cut racism does not mean they are some bad people attacking the good folk of our nation. They are not part of the court of law, they are public figures exercising their freedom of speech, who have been working diligently towards the eradication of racism in America. And I might add that the grand reduction in racism in America is in no small part due to the activists over the years who have continually tried to focus the American consciousness on this scourge.

It's our duty to look at each issue as it comes up and use our own judgement. No reason to enter with bias from either side, immediately certain that it's racially based or not racially based. And all this pointing the other direction, hey look a white guy was wronged by a black, is just rude and makes you guys look hateful. Sometimes there will be "reverse racism" and it will be evident. But don't do exactly what you seem angry at Sharpton/Jackson at doing, coming to racial conclusions far sooner than is warranted just to get those black folk back for thinking things are racially based. That's horseshit.
Al Sharpton smeared feces on a teenage girl to start a race riot. When there was no race riot, he realized he could profit handsomely from it. He's a scumbag race-baiting extortionist, just like Jesse Jackson.
 
Maybe you could quote where I said anything remotely like what you are saying I said?

Go Blazers

My response was not aimed directly at you, just a general thing. My apologies for making a post that looked as if I was directing that comment to you.
 
My response was not aimed directly at you, just a general thing. My apologies for making a post that looked as if I was directing that comment to you.

Fair enough. Anyway, how can a guy be mad at God?

Go Blazers
 
Of course this is a hate crime. Just because it's not the all mighty evil white man hitting a poor black man, doesn't make it a non hate crime.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top