wizenheimer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 25,115
- Likes
- 38,219
- Points
- 113
Assist numbers are part-bullshit by nature, it depends on the other player making the shot and having good players around you..
(fair warning: much coffee this morning so this will get long)
I'm sorry, but that just doesn't make sense to me. Do you think the other players miss a higher percentage of shots only when CJ passes to them, rather than Dame or ET or Plumlee or Batum? Every player who passes the ball will see assists 'lost' because the guy missed the shot.
and the system argument doesn't cut it either because every player is in the same system
the main criticism is that CJ's trend-line in terms of taking responsibility for running the offense is all wrong considering his usage and salaries. I'm sure you've seen it:
assists/game:
2015-16 4.3 2016-17 3.6 2017-18 3.4 2018-19 3.0
assist rate:
2015-16 21.6 2016-17 18.0 2017-18 15.8 2018-19 13.8
last season, Nurkic and Turner had much higher assist rates than CJ did. In fact, compare CJ's assist rate last season to other Blazers (besides Dame) over the 4 years of the Dame/CJ team:
Evan Turner 23.6 (2018-19)
Mason Plumlee 21.4 (2016-18)
Tim Frazier 21.3 (2015-16)
Shabazz Napier 19.5 (2016-18)
Brian Roberts 18.5 (2015-16)
Evan Turner 18.4 (2016-18)
Jusuf Nurkić 17.7 (2016-18)
Jusuf Nurkić 17.9 (2018-19)
Mason Plumlee 16.2 (2015-16)
Chris Kaman 15.8 (2015-16)
Shabazz Napier 14.6 (2017-18)
CJ McCollum 13.8 (2018-19)
Anfernee Simons 13.7 (2018-19
For chrissakes, Chris Kaman was much better at finding open teammates than CJ last season. Now, I know one of the excuses is going to be he was asked to carry a bigger scoring load as the years progressed. That excuse fails logically for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is how other developing players progressed in their assist rates:
Devin Booker:
2015-16 15.8 2016-17 16.3 2017-18 24.4 2018-19 34.1
Bradley Beal:
2015-16 15.6 2016-17 16.2 2017-18 21.0 2018-19 24.1(yeah yeah, but John Wall!)
Jamal Murray:
2016-17 14.0 2017-18 16.4 2018-19 22.4 2019-20 24.2
Demar Derozan:
2014-15 17.0 2015-16 20.8 2016-17 20.6 2017-18 25.0 2018-19 27.6
Donovan Mitchell:
2017-18 19.4 2018-19 21.2 2019-20 24.0
Victor Oladipo:
2015-16 18.6 2016-17 12.5 (playing with Westbrook) 2017-18 21.2 2018-19 25.2
that's probably enough examples. Why is it that all of those guys started out with a higher rate than CJ last season, then improved on it? I'm sure you could probably find players with trend-lines somewhat similar to CJ, but how many of those guys are going to be averaging 32M a year over the next 5 years?
***************
there is another consideration as well. At the end of the 17-18 season, somebody did an analysis of the 20 most frequent shooters in the NBA and posted the results:
the most interesting numbers there were in comparing CJ's points per touch (not good) to the time he spent with the ball and the number of dribbles he had. He was by far the most ball-dominant of the group while also being one of the least effective
if anything, he's only gotten 'worse' in those areas since then. More than that though is we've all seen what happens to the Blazer offense when CJ gets the ball and goes into his shake-n-bake-rocker-step-cross-over-dribbling-frenzy while burning thru gobs of shot clock: the rest of his teammates tend to stop their movement and stand around watching CJ go full ball-hog because they know the chances he'll reward them for getting open are small. That doesn't happen when Dame has the ball, and it didn't happen last year when Nurkic had the ball
CJ's ball-stopping is bad for the offense. Sure, when he's hitting all his shots it looks pretty if you're a CJ fan. But not if you're a fan of motion and passing in an offense. And that's the biggest complaint most of us have about CJ. It's not that his court vision is mediocre and he'll never be a PG. It's that he has become a less and less willing passer while stopping the ball more and more.
I guess it would be somewhat acceptable if he was really good at one-on-one...but he's not; he only has average efficiency. And, it would be a little more acceptable if he was a lock-down defender....but he's simply bad at defense
the worst part though is when people point out these things they get accused of not knowing basketball or just being CJ haters. That's happened several time in this thread alone
(like I said at the beginning...too much high octane coffee this morning...sorry)


