Jason, Jason, Jason.... = (

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Sinobas

Banned User
BANNED
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
14,608
Likes
5,486
Points
113
Just as Jason was starting to get some respect for his "behind the locker room door" articles, he goes and does something like this. :sigh:

This is how he voted for the yearly awards. I think he was trying too hard to look non-biased.
http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2009/04/how_i_voted_for_nba_postseason.html

Brandon Roy was not even in the top 5 in MVP voting, he placed him on the 3rd string behind Deron Williams. What a fucking joke. And Pau Gasol on the 3rd team?:biglaugh:

I don't think Travis has played well enough to be in consideration for sixth man of the year, he's not even the best player of our bench. What a joke Quick.
 
Man, I hope Roy ignores Quick for a while.

i'm fine with Roy being third team (even though he should be second team)... but if you're moving him down, it should be because of Tony Parker and not Deron Williams.
 
Man, I hope Roy ignores Quick for a while.

Do you really think that's how Brandon Roy thinks? I'd be disappointed in Roy if he treated Quick any different than he does right now. It's Quick's right to make that call. I don't agree with it, but what can you do.

In the end, nobody will give two shits about what Quick thought about Roy if they can win a championship in the next 3-4 years. I'm sure Roy knows that.
 
Roy is better than Deron Williams this year. There's really no statistical or rational argument against it, from what I see.

No Granger in his top 3 MIP?

And it's a quibble, but Kobe at second in MVP? This year is:
1.)Lebron James
1a.)Dwyane Wade

and everyone else a couple notches back. CP3 also ought to be above Kobe, IMO... if only because he deserved it more than KB last year.
 
I thought his picks were on the homer side - 6th man and COY in particular.
 
I don't see anything wrong with his MVP voting. Nothing at all.

You're bitching just to bitch.
 
Frickin' idiot. Deron Williams didn't even make the all-star team. The coaches who vote on the all-star reserves, and know a lot more about basketball than Jason Quick, favored Roy over Williams (again). Roy is statistically better than Williams AND he led his team to a better record. How in the crap does he put Williams ahead of Roy? Idiot!

BNM
 
Who cares if Quick thinks Williams played better. He is entitled to his opinion no matter how wrong he is. Roy would be a big baby if he held this against Quick. At least it isn't extremely ridiculous of a pick like Bargs was over Roy ( F YOU chuck swirsky)
 
I have a problem with Quick putting Deron Williams ahead of Roy. Roy played in more games, his team won more games, and he plays with less All-Star teammates. Oh, and he made the friggin' All-Star game, while Williams did not. Plus, Quick writes glowingly of Roy's poise and his leadership, and then he craps on him by placing Deron Williams, who does much less with much more at this point, ahead of him on an All-NBA team.

Sorry, but Roy should shun him, because Quick appears to be more into himself than he is about educating himself about the NBA.
 
What a weird All-NBA list... no Tim Duncan? no Paul Pierce? Chris Bosh and Kevin Durant don't deserve All-NBA for being on crappy teams. Quick's got it wrong.
 
It's his opinion, I also disagree with the Williams/Roy pick, but he IS entitled to it. And we're advocating Roy playing a childish game w/ him over hurt feelings? I'm hoping the blazers are more mature than that crap....
 
It's his opinion, I also disagree with the Williams/Roy pick, but he IS entitled to it. And we're advocating Roy playing a childish game w/ him over hurt feelings? I'm hoping the blazers are more mature than that crap....

I am also entitled to say that I disagree, and I've basically been a "Quick defender" on these boards, so it's not like I am always bashing the guy. While I want Roy to shun him, at the very least I hope Brandon goes and asks Quick why he put Deron Williams ahead of him on an All-NBA team. Plus, in light of Quick promising to be even more open in his Behind the Locker Room Door articles, now that "they are all on the same page", I would hope the players limit his access, because it appears he spends more times palling around than he does watching games.
 
Last edited:
I don't really have a problem with any of his picks, nothing to deserve this kind of reaction. Doesn't mean I agree with all of them completely.

Don't know if it's been posted yet, but here's 20 'experts' picks on ESPN.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=ROY-0809

Roy got two votes for most improved.

Travis got two votes for 6th man.

Nate got one pick for COY.

Looks like Lebron is a lock for MVP.
 
I don't really have a problem with any of his picks, nothing to deserve this kind of reaction. Doesn't mean I agree with all of them completely.

Don't know if it's been posted yet, but here's 20 'experts' picks on ESPN.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=ROY-0809

Roy got two votes for most improved.

Travis got two votes for 6th man.

Nate got one pick for COY.

Looks like Lebron is a lock for MVP.

I am amazed that there are people who think that Dwyane Wade deserves it over him. Look at James' numbers on a normal team and he's probably MVP this season. Put him on a 67-win team with one alternate All-Star as a teammate? It should be the biggest MVP lock in memory.
 
Well, I think Brandon is a top 5 player in the NBA. At they very least, he's more valuable than Chauncy freakin Billups. I mean, come on, that was an obvious attempt to look non-biased. I hate it when people are not genuine...but what do I know, maybe he really thinks that.

But it's hard to understand, since he would have watched Roy single handedly win many games for us this year. Roy has taken over and scored in the clutch so many times this season...he's easily a top 5 talent.
 
WTF is this? Is he trying to get some cred by trying NOT to be a homer? In the end he just looks like an ass.
 
Well, I think Brandon is a top 5 player in the NBA. At they very least, he's more valuable than Chauncy freakin Billups. I mean, come on, that was an obvious attempt to look non-biased. I hate it when people are not genuine...but what do I know, maybe he really thinks that.

But it's hard to understand, since he would have watched Roy single handedly win many games for us this year. Roy has taken over and scored in the clutch so many times this season...he's easily a top 5 talent.

The Nuggets would not be the 2nd seed without Billups. Billups came in for Iverson and totally changed that team.

Could you argue Roy deserves MVP over Billups? Sure. But is it a big deal if Billups is mentioned ahead of Roy? Not at all. The Nuggets have a better seed than the Blazers and Billups is arguably the main reason why.
 
Billups is not a top 5 MVP candidate. I know the Nuggets may have the #2 seed but they've only won one more game than us. Roy is better than Billups and he has done it without another All Star. Billups has Melo. And it's so stupid to put DWill ahead of Roy. Ridiculous.
 
It depends on how you define the MVP. If you give people credit for boosting a team like when Nash won it right after he got to Phoenix and they were really good, Billups makes sense. If you are just going by the best player, Chris Paul should probably be on the list above Roy or Billups.
 
Billups is not a top 5 MVP candidate. I know the Nuggets may have the #2 seed but they've only won one more game than us. Roy is better than Billups and he has done it without another All Star. Billups has Melo. And it's so stupid to put DWill ahead of Roy. Ridiculous.

Blazers have a much better supporting cast then the Nuggets.

Billups has been great this year, him ranked ahead of Roy is a valid argument.
 
Blazers have a much better supporting cast then the Nuggets.

Billups has been great this year, him ranked ahead of Roy is a valid argument.

Much better? Anthony, Nene, JR Smith, Kleiza, and some good role players like Chris Anderson and Martin? No, I would not say we have a "much" better supporting cast. At least not yet, as our guys still have a lot of room to improve. So if that is your argument, I'd say it's completely invalid. The Nuggets were a force before Billups arrived.
 
It depends on how you define the MVP. If you give people credit for boosting a team like when Nash won it right after he got to Phoenix and they were really good, Billups makes sense. If you are just going by the best player, Chris Paul should probably be on the list above Roy or Billups.

I think the best way to define MVP is to question where the team would be without "X" player. The Cavs without Lebron are probably a lottery team. The Lakers without Kobe, they're still pretty good. The Blazers without Roy are not making the playoffs but I don't think they're in the race for the #1 pick.
 
That was a weird list. Some of them you could tell he was being a homer and other ones like the all nba team he was just plain stupid putting Roy and Billups on the third team and not including parker
 
The Nuggets would not be the 2nd seed without Billups. Billups came in for Iverson and totally changed that team.

Could you argue Roy deserves MVP over Billups? Sure. But is it a big deal if Billups is mentioned ahead of Roy? Not at all. The Nuggets have a better seed than the Blazers and Billups is arguably the main reason why.

So they went from a 50 to a 54 win team. Wow! That beats going from 41 to 54. :tsktsk:

And I guess by your logic, Buck Williams should have been MVP, because he turned the Blazers from an above average team to a title contending team. Heck, at least the Blazers MADE it to the finals, the Nuggets may be bounced in the 1st round by Dallas.
 
Yeah it was a bit biased (or unbiased?), but whatever. Everyone's entitled to their opinion(s).
 
I don't care which supporting cast was "better" or which team turned around more dramatically. Roy was the better player and therefore brought more value to his team than Billups did. Denver would be better with Roy instead of Billups and Portland would be worse with Billups instead of Roy. Roy is more valuable.
 
So they went from a 50 to a 54 win team. Wow! That beats going from 41 to 54. :tsktsk:

And I guess by your logic, Buck Williams should have been MVP, because he turned the Blazers from an above average team to a title contending team. Heck, at least the Blazers MADE it to the finals, the Nuggets may be bounced in the 1st round by Dallas.

No, they went from the 8th seed to the 2nd seed. Billups is the main thing that is the difference between last year and this year. If Billups doesn't get traded to Denver Portland wins the division. Instead Billups' team is ahead of Roy's.

And the playoffs have no meaning when it comes to the MVP trophy.
 
Quick explains his madness... He admits a mistake, but not the one some think.

http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2009/04/d_will_vs_broy_and_nba_is_noti.html

Whoa, people! Whoa!
A tough question: Williams or Roy?

Just got back from dinner, and boy, people must be bored tonight.

I will admit I made a huge mistake in my postseason ballot - a HUGE mistake - and I corrected it. There is no way I should have put Kevin Durant on the third team ahead of Tim Duncan. Have no idea what I was thinking. I have notified the NBA to change my ballot to reflect Duncan as third team forward in place of Durant.

Now as far as Brandon Roy on the third team behind Deron Williams ...

You all might be right. I never said it was an easy choice for me, and I never said it was the right choice.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top